Ryo Muranaka1, Yue Liu1, Itsuumi Okada1, Takashi Okazoe2, Akihiko Tsuda1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan. 2. Materials Integration Laboratories, AGC Inc., 1-1 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama City, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Abstract
Two new reaction processes involving the in situ oxidative photochemical conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 allowed selective syntheses of N-substituted ureas and isocyanates from amines. (I) A CHCl3 solution containing an amine and an organic base under O2 bubbling provided the urea derivative under exposure to UV light generated from a low-pressure mercury lamp at 20-40 °C. (II) A two-step reaction involving the oxidative photodecomposition of CHCl3 at lower temperatures and subsequent sequential injections of an amine and organic base into the sample solution provided the isocyanate in high yield. The reaction processes of (I) and (II) capitalize on the solution conditions of [COCl2] < [amine] and [COCl2] > [amine], respectively, to result in 1:2 and 1:1 reactions. In general, isocyanates, especially aromatic and haloalkyl ones, readily undergo hydrolysis in the presence of an organic base. However, with the advantage of synthesizing the isocyanates in CHCl3 solvent, direct addition of monoalcohols and diols to the as-prepared sample solution containing the diisocyanate allowed the one-pot syntheses of biscarbamates and polyurethanes, respectively. The reactions developed in this study are simple, safe, and inexpensive methods of synthesizing N-substituted ureas and isocyanates, and derivatives of isocyanates such as carbamates and polyurethanes. The present new methods can replace current synthetic methods using COCl2 in both academia and industry.
Two new reaction processes involving the in situ oxidative photochemical conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 allowed selective syntheses of N-substituted ureas and isocyanates from amines. (I) A CHCl3 solution containing an amine and an organic base under O2 bubbling provided the urea derivative under exposure to UV light generated from a low-pressure mercury lamp at 20-40 °C. (II) A two-step reaction involving the oxidative photodecomposition of CHCl3 at lower temperatures and subsequent sequential injections of an amine and organic base into the sample solution provided the isocyanate in high yield. The reaction processes of (I) and (II) capitalize on the solution conditions of [COCl2] < [amine] and [COCl2] > [amine], respectively, to result in 1:2 and 1:1 reactions. In general, isocyanates, especially aromatic and haloalkyl ones, readily undergo hydrolysis in the presence of an organic base. However, with the advantage of synthesizing the isocyanates in CHCl3 solvent, direct addition of monoalcohols and diols to the as-prepared sample solution containing the diisocyanate allowed the one-pot syntheses of biscarbamates and polyurethanes, respectively. The reactions developed in this study are simple, safe, and inexpensive methods of synthesizing N-substituted ureas and isocyanates, and derivatives of isocyanates such as carbamates and polyurethanes. The present new methods can replace current synthetic methods using COCl2 in both academia and industry.
Isocyanates, having
a −N=C=O group, are typically
synthesized from amines and phosgene (COCl2) in industry
(Scheme , reaction
a).[1−3] This chemical reaction was first reported by Hentschel in 1884[4] and has been used widely in manufacturing isocyanate
derivatives. N-Substituted ureas are also formed through the reaction
of isocyanates and amines, but they can be reconverted to the isocyanates
upon heating with COCl2 (reaction b).[5,6] Although
these reactions use COCl2, a highly toxic gaseous compound
at room temperature, they have enormous advantages in terms of reactivity,
product quality, and cost in comparison with other developed methods.[7] Hence, this method has been used for a century
without major modifications. For safe use of COCl2, bis(trichloromethyl)carbonate
(BTC), generally called triphosgene, a solid under standard conditions,
is preferred for synthesizing isocyanates in laboratory-scale experiments
and small-scale industrial production.[8] BTC generates COCl2in situ upon mixing
with an organic base in the solution, and its subsequent rapid reaction
with an amine gives the isocyanate (reaction c). However, Cotarca
and co-workers recently reported that BTC is also a highly toxic compound,
whose vapor pressure is sufficiently high to reach toxic concentrations
at room temperature.[9] This background motivated
us to develop safe, convenient, and inexpensive phosgenation reactions
for synthesizing N-substituted ureas and isocyanates without the use
of highly toxic corrosive reagents, expensive reagents, or a complicated
special apparatus. We herein report two novel reaction methods that
allow their selective syntheses by applying the in situ photochemical conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2. In these reactions, CHCl3 bifunctionally serves as a
solvent and a COCl2 precursor (reactions d and e).
Scheme 1
Syntheses of N-Substituted Ureas and Isocyanates
(a–c)
Conventional reactions.
(d, e) New reactions developed in this study.
Syntheses of N-Substituted Ureas and Isocyanates
(a–c)
Conventional reactions.
(d, e) New reactions developed in this study.We previously reported that CHCl3 undergoes oxidative
photodecomposition under exposure to UV light to efficiently produce
COCl2 (Scheme ).[10] Recently, we then successfully
developed in situ photo-on-demand phosgenation reactions.[11−13] As a representative example, a CHCl3 solution containing
a mixture of an alcohol and an organic base such as pyridine upon
exposure to UV-C light provided carbonate esters in high yield via the chloroformate as an intermediate.[13] Although it is known that the alcohol serves as a stabilizer
to decelerate the decomposition of CHCl3, and further,
that the organic base absorbs UV light,[14,15] the phosgenation
reaction occurred to give the product through an in situ base-catalyzed reaction of the alcohol and COCl2 generated
by the oxidative photodecomposition of CHCl3. In this study,
with the same procedures, we succeeded in synthesizing N-substituted
ureas through an in situ photo-on-demand phosgenation
reaction of amines with CHCl3.[16] Furthermore, we found that a two-step reaction, involving oxidative
photodecomposition of CHCl3 at low temperatures and subsequent
sequential injections of the amine and base into the solution, allowed
the practical synthesis of isocyanates.[17] The reaction facilitated one-pot conversions of the isocyanates
to carbamates and polyurethanes (PU) upon mixing with alcohols.
Scheme 2
Photo-on-Demand Syntheses of (a) Phosgene, (b) Chloroformate, and
(c) Carbonate Ester with CHCl3 as Reported Previously by
Our Group
Results and Discussion
Photochemical
Reaction System
A low-pressure mercury
lamp generates UV light mainly at wavelengths of 184.9 and 253.7 nm,
which cover the electronic absorption bands of CHCl3, originating
from σ–σ* and/or n−σ* transitions.
The lamp has an advantage in terms of its relatively low electric
power consumption compared with other light sources including light-emitting
diodes (LEDs) capable of emitting short-wavelength UV-C light.[10a,18] The lamp (20 W, ⌀24 mm × 120 mm), whose illuminance
at 185 and 254 nm is 2.00–2.33 and 5.96–8.09 mW/cm2, respectively, at 5 mm from the lamp, was inserted into the
solution via a quartz glass jacket (⌀28 mm)
fixed in the center of a cylindrical flask (⌀42 mm). This setup
allows for transmission of UV-C light, while protecting the lamp from
corrosive gases such as HCl and COCl2, which are generated
by photochemical reactions. The photoreactor is further connected
to a gas trap system containing alkaline water such as NaHCO3 aq. and NaOH aq., which can decompose unreacted COCl2 and HCl.
Photo-on-Demand Synthesis of N-Substituted
Ureas
With
this reaction system, we initially demonstrated the in situ photo-on-demand phosgenation reaction with cyclohexylamine, an aliphatic
amine, by reference to the procedures developed in our previous study.[13] When a CHCl3 solution (20 mL) containing
10 mmol of amine was exposed to UV light under O2 bubbling
(0.1 L/min) with vigorous stirring at 20 °C, the sample solution
immediately became a white suspension due to the formation of the
HCl salt of the amine (Scheme , entry 1). The resulting sample solution contained 1,3-dicyclohexylurea,
which is expected from the reaction of the amine and COCl2, but it was obtained only in 4% yield. To trap the generated HCl,
which most likely decelerates the nucleophilic substitution of the
amine to COCl2, the photochemical reaction was then carried
out upon mixing with triethylamine (TEA). Although the urea yield
was slightly increased to 16%, the reaction stopped in a short time,
probably due to the decomposition of TEA that resulted in dark coloration
of the sample solution (entry 2). The yield was also increased slightly
when using pyridine, whose UV light resistance and basicity are relatively
higher and lower, respectively, than those of TEA (entry 3). Based
on the hypothesis that aliphatic amines having higher basicity dominantly
react with HCl rather than COCl2, we next performed the
photochemical reaction with aniline, an aromatic amine, having lower
basicity. The reaction of aniline without a base also mainly provided
the HCl salt of aniline with the corresponding urea only in 3% yield
(entry 4). However, the reaction with a CHCl3 solution
containing a mixture of aniline and 5 equiv amounts of pyridine provided
1,3-diphenylurea in 51% isolated yield (entry 5). 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene
(DBU), having higher basicity than pyridine, also allowed the formation
of urea but caused its photodecomposition, decreasing the yield to
38% (entry 6). Pentafluoroaniline, having lower basicity than aniline,
in the presence of pyridine provided the corresponding urea in 21%
yield (entry 7). When this reaction was applied to the synthesis of
1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI),[19] which is widely used as a phosgene substitute in organic syntheses,
it was obtained in 31% yield (>99% in 1H NMR yield)
from
a CHCl3 solution of imidazole (IZ) and 2,6-lutidine (Scheme ). The lower isolated
yield than that estimated by 1H NMR analysis (>99%)
may
be responsible to that CDI readily undergoes hydrolysis under air
in the presence of base.
Scheme 3
Photochemical Syntheses of N-Substituted
Ureas with CHCl3 Solutions Containing an Amine and an Organic
Base
Reaction procedures and conditions:
Irradiation by UV light of 20 mL of CHCl3 containing 10
mmol of amine and 0–5 equiv of base under O2 bubbling
(0.1 L/min) with a 20 W low-pressure mercury lamp.
Scheme 4
Photochemical Synthesis of CDI with CHCl3 Solutions Containing
Imidazole and 2,6-Lutidine
Yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Reaction procedures and conditions: Irradiation by UV light of 20
mL of CHCl3 containing 10 mmol of IZ and 5 equiv of 2,6-lutidine
under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) with a 20 W low-pressure
mercury lamp.
Photochemical Syntheses of N-Substituted
Ureas with CHCl3 Solutions Containing an Amine and an Organic
Base
Reaction procedures and conditions:
Irradiation by UV light of 20 mL of CHCl3 containing 10
mmol of amine and 0–5 equiv of base under O2 bubbling
(0.1 L/min) with a 20 W low-pressure mercury lamp.
Photochemical Synthesis of CDI with CHCl3 Solutions Containing
Imidazole and 2,6-Lutidine
Yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis.Reaction procedures and conditions: Irradiation by UV light of 20
mL of CHCl3 containing 10 mmol of IZ and 5 equiv of 2,6-lutidine
under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) with a 20 W low-pressure
mercury lamp.
Synthesis of Isocyanates
by a Two-Step Procedure
The
N-substituted ureas described above might form under the condition
of [amine] > [COCl2], which allows an immediate reaction
of COCl2 with two molecules of the amine via the formation of an isocyanate. Thus, it can be expected that the
condition of [amine] < [COCl2], which allows a preferential
reaction of the amine with COCl2 rather than the isocyanate
formed in the reaction, would provide mainly the corresponding isocyanate
through a 1:1 reaction. Considering the low boiling point of COCl2 (8.3 °C), a two-step procedure by preparation of a CHCl3 solution containing COCl2 was conducted at low
temperatures, with subsequent injection of the amine into the solution.
Prior to performing this experiment, we first examined whether CHCl3 undergoes oxidative photodecomposition at 0 °C to give
a CHCl3 solution of COCl2. With the same reaction
system as that for the preparation of N-substituted ureas, 20 mL of
CHCl3 after exposure to UV light at 0 °C for 1 h under
O2 bubbling at a flow rate of 0.1 L/min was found to contain
18.5 mmol of COCl2, which could be estimated from the amounts
of the products formed upon addition of ethanol (chloroformate and
carbonate ester). By reference to this result, 10 mmol of aniline
was added to 50 mL of a CHCl3 solution containing COCl2, as prepared upon photoirradiation at 0 °C for 3 h.
The aniline was slightly converted to the corresponding isocyanate
but was mainly obtained as its HCl salt. The HCl originated from what
remained in the CHCl3 solution and what was generated by
the reaction of aniline with COCl2. However, the HCl salt
of aniline could be further reacted with unreacted COCl2 upon elevating the temperature to 60 °C to give the isocyanate
in 80% yield (Scheme , entry 1). The HCl salts of amines are known to react with COCl2 at high temperatures (vide ante) to give
isocyanates,[2b] and this method has actually
been used for industrial production. However, one may expect under
these conditions that COCl2 would not be retained in the
sample solution but would vaporize to the gas phase. This may reduce
the yield of the product and is also unfavorable in terms of the safe
handling of the reaction, especially in laboratory-scale experiments.
To achieve the synthesis of the isocyanate at low temperatures, preferably
below the boiling point of COCl2, we then added an organic
base such as pyridine or 2,6-lutidine to the above CHCl3 solution containing the HCl salt of aniline and COCl2 without elevating the temperature. The corresponding isocyanate
was obtained in >99 and 97% yields, respectively (entries 2 and
3).
Scheme 5
Two-Step Procedure for Synthesizing Phenyl Isocyanate through
the
Photochemical Conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 and
Subsequent Addition of Aniline
Yields were determined
by 1H NMR analysis.
Reaction procedures and conditions: [Step 1] irradiation by UV
light
of 50 mL of CHCl3 under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min)
at 0 °C for 3 h. [Step 2] (1) Addition of 10 mmol of amine. (2)
Addition of 5 equiv of base.
Two-Step Procedure for Synthesizing Phenyl Isocyanate through
the
Photochemical Conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 and
Subsequent Addition of Aniline
Yields were determined
by 1H NMR analysis.Reaction procedures and conditions: [Step 1] irradiation by UV
light
of 50 mL of CHCl3 under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min)
at 0 °C for 3 h. [Step 2] (1) Addition of 10 mmol of amine. (2)
Addition of 5 equiv of base.The reaction
was further available for the synthesis of a variety
of isocyanates (Scheme ). Hexylamine, having higher basicity than aniline, also provided
the corresponding isocyanate in >99% yield. Fluorine-substituted
aniline
and an alkyl amine, having lower basicity, provided the corresponding
isocyanates in 62 and 66% yields, respectively. 3-(Triethoxysilyl)propylamine
and 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propylamine, which readily undergo hydrolysis
condensations with water under acidic conditions, also provided the
corresponding isocyanates in 62 and 56% yields, respectively. This
reaction was further applicable to the synthesis of a series of diisocyanates
that are used in the manufacturing of polyurethanes in industry (Scheme ).[6] Aromatic diisocyanates such as toluene diisocyanate (TDI),
methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), benzene diisocyanate (BDI),
and naphthalene diisocyanate (NDI) were successfully synthesized in
80, 90, 47, and 67% yields, respectively. Alkyl diisocyanates such
as hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) and pentamethylene diisocyanate
(PDI) were also obtained in 96 and 83% yields, respectively. Aliphatic
diisocyanates including a cyclic component such as m-xylylene diisocyanate (XDI), 1,4-bis(isocyanatomethyl) cyclohexane
(H6XDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), and norbornanediisocyanate
(NBDI) were obtained in 63, 58, 42, and 65% yields, respectively.
Scheme 6
Two-Step Procedure for Synthesizing Monoisocyanates through the Photochemical
Conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 and Subsequent
Addition of Amine
Reaction procedures and conditions:
[Step 1] Irradiation by UV light of 50 mL of CHCl3 under
O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) at 0 °C for 3 h. [Step 2]
(1) Addition of 10 mmol of amine. (2) Addition of 5 equiv of base.
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Scheme 7
Two-Step Procedure for Synthesizing Diisocyanates through the
Photochemical
Conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 and Subsequent
Addition of Diamines
Reaction procedures and conditions:
[Step 1] Irradiation by UV light of 50 mL of CHCl3 under
O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) at 0 °C for 3 h. [Step 2]
(1) Addition of 10 mmol of diamine. (2) Addition of 5 equiv of base.
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Two-Step Procedure for Synthesizing Monoisocyanates through the Photochemical
Conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 and Subsequent
Addition of Amine
Reaction procedures and conditions:
[Step 1] Irradiation by UV light of 50 mL of CHCl3 under
O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) at 0 °C for 3 h. [Step 2]
(1) Addition of 10 mmol of amine. (2) Addition of 5 equiv of base.
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Two-Step Procedure for Synthesizing Diisocyanates through the
Photochemical
Conversion of CHCl3 to COCl2 and Subsequent
Addition of Diamines
Reaction procedures and conditions:
[Step 1] Irradiation by UV light of 50 mL of CHCl3 under
O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) at 0 °C for 3 h. [Step 2]
(1) Addition of 10 mmol of diamine. (2) Addition of 5 equiv of base.
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.
One-Pot Syntheses of Biscarbamates and Polyurethanes
These isocyanates and diisocyanates can be isolated by vacuum distillation,
and the HCl salt of pyridine remaining as a byproduct can also be
reused by treating it with an inorganic base such as aqueous NaOH.
However, since isocyanates are generally moisture sensitive, especially
in the presence of organic bases, the isocyanates produced using this
method readily undergo hydrolysis under air to give the corresponding
amines. The amine then further reacts with isocyanate to give the
corresponding urea derivative. With the advantage of preparing the
isocyanates in CHCl3 solvent, we further demonstrated the
one-pot synthesis of carbamates without their isolation (Scheme ). When EtOH was
added to the CHCl3 solution containing MDI, as prepared
by the above two-step procedure, the corresponding biscarbamate was
obtained in 78% yield (91% by 1H NMR). 1,1,1,3,3,3,-Hexafluoro-2-propanol
(HFIP), whose nucleophilicity is lower than that of EtOH, also allowed
the reaction upon mixing with additional pyridine to give the corresponding
biscarbamate in 71% yield (76% in 1H NMR yield). The pyridine
might allow the catalytic substitution of HFIP to MDI. HDI, whose
reactivity is relatively low compared with MDI, also provided the
corresponding biscarbamate through the reaction with HFIP, but the
yield was reduced to 37% (47% by 1H NMR). We further demonstrated
the one-pot synthesis of polyurethane upon addition of 1,6-hexanediol
(HD) to the CHCl3 solution containing MDI. The corresponding
polyurethane [poly(MDI-HD)] was obtained in 50% yield and had an average
molecular weight of Mw = 4100 and Mn = 2200 (Mw/Mn = 1.87). This observed low yield and relatively
low average molecular weight most likely originated from the poor
solubility of the PU formed in the reaction. Poly(propylene glycol)
(PPG) with an average molecular weight of 400 that can increase the
solubility of PU provided poly(MDI-PPG) in 89% yield with Mw = 6200 and Mn =
3600 (Mw/Mn = 1.72).
Scheme 8
One-Pot Syntheses of Biscarbamates and Polyurethanes
from Diamines
through Their Photochemical Conversions to the Diisocyanates
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Reaction procedures and conditions:
(1) irradiation by UV light of
50 mL of CHCl3 under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min)
at 0 °C for 3 h. (2) Addition of 5 mmol of diamine. (3) Addition
of 10 equiv of base. (4) Addition of [A] 20 mmol of alcohol with or
without 25 mmol of base or [B] 5 mmol of diol.
One-Pot Syntheses of Biscarbamates and Polyurethanes
from Diamines
through Their Photochemical Conversions to the Diisocyanates
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.Reaction procedures and conditions:
(1) irradiation by UV light of
50 mL of CHCl3 under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min)
at 0 °C for 3 h. (2) Addition of 5 mmol of diamine. (3) Addition
of 10 equiv of base. (4) Addition of [A] 20 mmol of alcohol with or
without 25 mmol of base or [B] 5 mmol of diol.With similar procedures, we next demonstrated the one-pot syntheses
of a biscarbonate and a polyurethane, including a fluoroalkyl backbone,
from the HCl salt of 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorohexane-1,6-diamine
(8FHDA·2HCl) (Scheme ). Photoirradiation of a CHCl3 solution containing
insoluble 8FHDA·2HCl at 0 °C, and subsequent slow injection
of 2,6-lutidine into the sample solution, quantitatively provided
the corresponding diisocyanate (8FHDI), which was characterized by 1H NMR analysis. Although 8FHDI formed in the solution was
highly moisture sensitive, which would cause its hydration, the one-pot
procedure upon addition of HFIP to the sample solution afforded the
corresponding biscarbamate in 37% yield (68% by 1H NMR).
The addition of HD and PPG provided the corresponding polyurethanes
in 91% yield with Mw = 4000 and Mn = 2400 (Mw/Mn = 1.66) and 86% yield with Mw = 8800 and Mn = 3400 (Mw/Mn = 2.59), respectively.
Scheme 9
One-Pot Syntheses of Biscarbamates and Polyurethane from a HCl Salt
of Fluoroalkylene Diamine through Photochemical Conversion to Diisocyanate
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Reaction procedures and conditions:
(1) irradiation by UV light of
30 mL of CHCl3 containing 2 mmol of 8FHDA·2HCl under
O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) at 0 °C for 3 h. (2) Addition
of 10 equiv of 2,6-lutidine. (3) Addition of [A] 8 mmol of HFIP with
8 mmol of 2,6-lutidine or [B] 2 mmol of diol.
One-Pot Syntheses of Biscarbamates and Polyurethane from a HCl Salt
of Fluoroalkylene Diamine through Photochemical Conversion to Diisocyanate
Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis.Reaction procedures and conditions:
(1) irradiation by UV light of
30 mL of CHCl3 containing 2 mmol of 8FHDA·2HCl under
O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) at 0 °C for 3 h. (2) Addition
of 10 equiv of 2,6-lutidine. (3) Addition of [A] 8 mmol of HFIP with
8 mmol of 2,6-lutidine or [B] 2 mmol of diol.
Conclusions
In this study, N-substituted ureas and isocyanates
were selectively
synthesized from amines by two new reaction processes, involving photo-on-demand
phosgenation reactions with CHCl3. Direct UV irradiation
of a CHCl3 solution containing an amine under O2 bubbling provided N-substituted ureas. This reaction allowed for
a higher concentration of the amine than that of COCl2,
which was constantly generated from the CHCl3 solution,
resulting in a 2:1 reaction. A two-step reaction, involving oxidative
photodecomposition of CHCl3 at low temperatures and subsequent
slow injection of an amine and organic base into the sample solution,
resulted in dominant formation of the isocyanate through the base-catalyzed
1:1 reaction of amine and COCl2. This process allowed a
lower concentration of the amine than that of COCl2. The
isocyanates formed under these conditions readily underwent hydrolysis
under air. However, with the advantage of synthesizing isocyanates
in CHCl3 solvent, this reaction system allowed for one-pot
syntheses of biscarbamates and polyurethanes upon direct addition
of monoalcohols and diols, respectively, to the as-prepared CHCl3 solution of the diisocyanate. The obtained biscarbamates
bearing electron-withdrawing fluoroalkyl groups are also interesting
as blocked isocyanates applicable for synthesizing polyurethanes.[20] The photochemical reactions reported herein
are simple and safe methods of synthesizing N-substituted ureas and
isocyanates and are expected to be an innovative method that can replace
current phosgenation reactions.
Experimental Section
General
Information
Unless otherwise noted, all reagents
were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further
purification. 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-Octafluoro-1,6-diaminohexane hydrochloride
(8FHDA·2HCl) was synthesized according to the literature method.[21] For vacuum distillation, a glass tube oven (Sibata
Scientific Technology, model GTO-1000) was used with an oil rotary
vacuum pump. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker AVANCE 400 spectrometer or Bruker AVANCE 500 spectrometer,
where chemical shifts (δ in ppm) were determined with respect
to tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. 19F NMR spectra
were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 400 spectrometer, where chemical
shifts (δ in ppm) were determined with respect to hexafluorobenzene
as an external standard. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
was performed on a JASCO FT/IR 4200. Fourier transform mass spectrometry
was performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific LTQ Orbitrap. Elemental
analysis was carried out on a Yanaco CHN corder MT-5 analyzer. Size-exclusion
chromatography (SEC) measurements were performed at 40 °C on
TOHSOH TSKgel G5000HHR and TSKgel G4000HHR columns
using a JASCO Type PU-2089 quaternary gradient pump, equipped with
a JASCO type RI-4030 refractive index detector with tetrahydrofuran
(THF) as an eluent. Polystyrene standards (123 000, 50 000,
25 000, 13 502, 4000, 1300 Da, 0.56% w/v) were used
for calibration of the molecular weights of the polymers.
General Procedure
for the Synthesis of N-Substituted Ureas
A cylindrical flask
(⌀42 × 120 mm2), equipped
with a low-pressure mercury lamp (Sen Light Co., UVL20PH-6, 20 W,
⌀24 × 120 mm2) and a magnetic stirring bar,
was charged with a CHCl3 solution (20 mL) containing an
amine (10 mmol) and an organic base (1.5 or 5.0 equiv). If necessary,
an aluminum block bath or water bath was used to heat the sample solution.
The sample solution was vigorously stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min) under exposure to UV light for 0.5–2.0
h. After the photochemical reaction, the lamp was turned off, and
the sample solution was stirred at 50 °C for 0.5–1.0 h
to remove the unreacted COCl2 and generated HCl dissolved
in the solution. The resulting sample solution was washed with water
and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic
layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated
to dryness. The residue was recrystallized to give the N-substituted
urea.
1,3-Dicyclohexylurea
CHCl3 (20 mL), cyclohexylamine
(10 mmol, 1.15 mL), and triethylamine (15 mmol, 2.1 mL) were mixed
in a cylindrical flask. The sample solution was vigorously stirred
under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) and exposed to UV light at
20 °C for 0.5 h. After the photochemical reaction, the lamp was
turned off, and the sample solution was stirred at 50 °C for
1 h. It was then washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness. 1,3-Dicyclohexylurea
was obtained through recrystallization with CHCl3/n-hexane as a white solid in 16% yield (0.18 g, 0.8 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 5.56 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 1.70–1.74 (m, 4H), 1.61 (dt, 4H, J = 3.6, 13.2 Hz), 1.50 (dt, 2H, J = 3.2, 12.0 Hz),
1.03–1.27 (m, 10H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 47.4, 33.2, 25.2, 24.4.
1,3-Diphenylurea
CHCl3 (20 mL), aniline
(10 mmol, 0.91 mL), and pyridine (50 mmol, 4.0 mL) were mixed in a
cylindrical flask. The sample solution was vigorously stirred under
O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) and exposed to UV light at 20 °C
for 2 h. After the photochemical reaction, the lamp was turned off,
and the sample solution was stirred at 50 °C for 1 h. It was
then washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness. 1,3-Diphenylurea was obtained
through recrystallization with EtOAc/n-hexane as
a white solid in 51% yield (0.54 g, 2.5 mmol). 1H NMR (400
MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 7.45
(d, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.28 (t, 4H, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.97 (t, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm:
152.5, 139.6, 128.7, 121.7, 118.1.
1,3-Bis(perfluorophenyl)urea
CHCl3 (20 mL),
2,3,4,5,6-pentafluoroaniline (10 mmol, 1.83 g), and pyridine (50 mmol,
4.0 mL) were mixed in a cylindrical flask. The sample solution was
vigorously stirred under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) and exposed
to UV light at 40 °C for 2 h. After the photochemical reaction,
the lamp was turned off, and the sample solution was stirred at 50
°C for 1 h. It was then washed with water and extracted with
CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness.
1,3-Bis(perfluorophenyl)urea was obtained through recrystallization
with EtOAc/n-hexane as a white solid in 21% yield
(0.41 g, 1.0 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 9.04 (br, 2H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm:
152.1, 114.3, 141.9, 140.1, 138.5, 137.6, 136.0, 113.6; 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm
= −146.4 (d, 4F, J = 20.3 Hz), −158.8
(br, 2F), −163.9 (t, 4F, J = 21.8 Hz).
1,1-Carbonyldiimidazole
CHCl3 (20 mL), imidazole
(10 mmol, 0.68 g), and 2,6-lutidine (50 mmol, 5.80 mL) were mixed
in a cylindrical flask. The sample solution was vigorously stirred
under O2 bubbling (0.1 L/min) and exposed to UV light at
20 °C for 2 h. After the photochemical reaction, the lamp was
turned off, and the sample solution was stirred at 50 °C for
0.5 h. 1,2-Dichloroethane (5 mmol, 0.40 mL) was then added to the
sample solution as an internal standard, and the yield of 1,1-carbonyldiimidazole
produced was estimated to be 99% in the 1H NMR analysis.
The solvent was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The
residue was recrystallized with THF to give a white solid in 31% yield
(0.25 g, 1.5 mmol). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,
293 K) δ/ppm: 8.20 (s, 2H), 7.53 (t, 2H, J =
1.6 Hz), 7.26 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 293 K) δ/ppm: 138.3, 132.3, 118.9.
General Procedure
for the Synthesis of Monoisocyanates
A cylindrical flask
(⌀42 × 120 mm2), equipped
with a low-pressure mercury lamp (Sen Light Co., UVL20PH-6, 20 W,
⌀24 × 120 mm2) and a magnetic stirring bar,
was charged with CHCl3 (20 mL). The sample was cooled at
0 °C with an ice bath and vigorously stirred upon bubbling with
O2 (0.1 L/min) under exposure to UV light for 3 h. After
the photochemical reaction, the lamp was turned off, and amine (10
mmol) and organic base (5 equiv) were sequentially added to the sample
solution with a syringe pump. The sample solution was stirred at 0
°C for 1 h and then further stirred at 60 °C for 1.5 h to
remove the unreacted COCl2 dissolved in the solution. C2H4Cl2 or CH2Cl2 was then added to the sample solution as an internal standard, and
the yield of the isocyanate produced was determined by 1H NMR analysis.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Diisocyanates
A cylindrical flask (⌀42 × 120 mm2), equipped
with a low-pressure mercury lamp (Sen Light Co., UVL20PH-6, 20 W,
⌀24 × 120 mm2) and a magnetic stirring bar,
was charged with CHCl3 (50 mL). The sample was cooled at
0 °C with an ice bath and vigorously stirred upon bubbling with
O2 (0.1 L/min) under exposure to UV light for 3 h. After
the photochemical reaction, the lamp was turned off, and diamine (5
mmol) and organic base (10 equiv) were sequentially added to the sample
solution with a syringe pump at −20 to 0 °C. The sample
solution was further stirred for 1.5 h at 60 °C or subjected
to vacuum distillation to remove the unreacted COCl2 dissolved
in the solution. The yields of the diisocyanates were then determined
by 1H NMR analysis with CH2Cl2 or
C2H4Cl2 as an internal standard.
Synthesis of Biscarbamates and Polyurethane
MDI-2EtOH
A cylindrical
flask, equipped with a low-pressure
mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged with CHCl3 (50 mL). The sample was cooled at 0 °C with an ice bath
and vigorously stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min)
under exposure to UV light for 3 h. After the photochemical reaction,
the lamp was turned off, and the sample solution was cooled to −20
°C. 4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane (5.0 mmol, 1.00 g) dissolved
in CHCl3 (10 mL) and pyridine (50 mmol, 4.0 mL) was sequentially
added to the sample solution with a syringe pump at this temperature.
The sample solution was then evaporated at 100 °C to remove the
solvent. Ethanol (20 mmol, 1.17 mL) was injected into the sample with
a syringe pump, and the sample solution was stirred at 30 °C
for 2 h. The sample was washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under
reduced pressure. The residue was dried under vacuum at 50 °C
for 2 h to give MDI-2EtOH in 78% yield (1.33 g) as a dark brown colloidal
solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 9.52 (s, NH), 7.37 (d, 4H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.09 (d, 4H, J = 8.4 Hz), 4.11 (q, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.79 (s, 2H), 1.23 (t, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 153.5, 137.1, 135.3, 128.7, 118.3, 59.9,
14.5. IR (attenuated total reflectance (ATR)) ν (cm–1): 3320, 3123, 3045, 2979, 2931, 1697, 1595, 1525, 1478, 1443, 1414,
1390, 1365, 1315, 1230, 1067, 922, 858, 815, 758, 668. High-resolution
mass spectrometry (HRMS) (electrospray ionization (ESI) orbitrap) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C19H22N2O4Na 365.1477; found
365.1475.
MDI-2HFIP
A cylindrical flask, equipped
with a low-pressure
mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged with CHCl3 (50 mL). The sample was cooled at 0 °C with an ice bath
and vigorously stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min)
under exposure to UV light for 3 h. After the photochemical reaction,
the lamp was turned off, and the sample solution was cooled to −20
°C. 4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane (5.0 mmol, 1.00 g) dissolved
in CHCl3 (10 mL) and pyridine (50 mmol, 4.0 mL) was sequentially
added to the sample solution with a syringe pump at this temperature.
The sample solution was then evaporated at 100 °C to remove the
solvent. A mixture of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (20 mmol,
2.31 mL) and pyridine (25 mmol, 2.0 mL) was injected into the sample
with a syringe pump, and the sample solution was stirred at 30 °C
for 2 h. The sample was washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under
reduced pressure. The residue was dried under vacuum at 50 °C
for 2 h to give MDI-2HFIP in 71% yield (2.07 g) as light brown powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 293 K) δ/ppm: 7.33
(d, 4H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.16 (d, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 5.75 (sep, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz), 3.94 (s,
2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 149.6, 136.8, 135.4, 139.1, 120.1 (q, J = 278.5 Hz), 119.0, 116.7, 66.4 (m); 19F NMR
(376 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm:
−72.5 (d, J = 6.8 Hz). IR (ATR) ν (cm–1): 3308, 3126, 3045, 2977, 1736, 1597, 1539, 1414,
1382, 1357, 1247, 1222, 1190, 1105, 1005, 906, 888, 848, 809, 781,
757, 688, 658. HRMS (ESI orbitrap) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C21H14F12N2O4Na 609.0660; found 609.0639.
HDI-2HFIP
A cylindrical flask, equipped with a low-pressure
mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged with CHCl3 (50 mL). The sample was cooled at 0 °C with an ice bath
and vigorously stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min)
under exposure to UV light for 3 h. After the photochemical reaction,
the lamp was turned off, and the sample solution was cooled to −20
°C. 1,6-Hexanediamine (5.0 mmol, 0.58 g) dissolved in CHCl3 (10 mL) and pyridine (50 mmol, 4.0 mL) was sequentially added
to the sample solution with a syringe pump at this temperature. The
sample solution was then evaporated at 100 °C to remove the solvent.
A mixture of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (20 mmol, 2.31 mL)
and 2,6-lutidine (25 mmol, 2.9 mL) was injected into the sample with
a syringe pump, and the sample solution was stirred at 40 °C
for 65 h. The sample was washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness
under reduced pressure. The residue was dried under vacuum at 50 °C
for 2 h to give HDI-2HFIP in 37% yield (0.86 g) as white powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 293 K) δ/ppm: 5.67
(sep, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz), 5.12 (br, NH), 3.27 (q, 4H, J = 8.8 Hz), 1.57 (t, 4H, J = 6.8 Hz),
1.37 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 152.4, 121.1 (q, J = 282.9 Hz), 66.5 (m), 40.8, 28.8, 25.7; 19F NMR (376
MHz, CDCl3, 293 K) δ/ppm: −73.6 (d, J = 5.3 Hz). IR (ATR) ν (cm–1):
3336, 3072, 2971, 2937, 2865, 1731, 1548, 1383, 1355, 1252, 1193,
1145, 1102, 1066, 1007, 944, 905, 878, 747, 691, 652. ESI HRMS m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C14H16F12N2O4Na
527.0816; found 527.0812.
Poly(MDI-HD)
A cylindrical flask,
equipped with a low-pressure
mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged with CHCl3 (50 mL). The sample was cooled at 0 °C with an ice bath
and vigorously stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min)
under exposure to UV light for 3 h. After the photochemical reaction,
the lamp was turned off, and the sample solution was cooled to −20
°C. 4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane (5.0 mmol, 1.00 g) dissolved
in CHCl3 (10 mL) and pyridine (50 mmol, 4.0 mL) was sequentially
added to the sample solution with a syringe pump at this temperature.
The sample solution was then evaporated at 90 °C to remove the
solvent. 1,6-Hexanediol (5 mmol, 0.59 g) dissolved in CHCl3 (7 mL) was injected into the sample with a syringe pump, and the
sample solution was stirred at −20 °C for 12 h. The sample
was washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure.
The residue was dried under vacuum at 50 °C for 2 h to give poly(MDI-HD)
in 50% yield (0.92 g) as brown powder. The average molecular weight
was estimated by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) in comparison
with the polystyrene standard: Mw = 4100, Mn = 2200, Mw/Mn = 1.87. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 9.50 (s, NH), 7.35 (d,
4H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.08 (d, 4H, J =
8.0 Hz), 4.05 (s, 4H), 3.78 (s, 2H), 3.39 (t, 4H, J = 6.4 Hz), 1.62–1.21 (m, 9H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 153.5, 137.0,
135.3, 128.7, 118.2, 63.9, 60.5, 32.3, 28.4, 25.1. IR (ATR) ν
(cm–1): 3308, 3120, 3045, 2934, 2857, 1698, 1596,
1530, 1413, 1310, 1230, 1069, 815, 769, 678.
Poly(MDI-PPG)
A cylindrical flask, equipped with a
low-pressure mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged
with CHCl3 (50 mL). The sample was cooled at 0 °C
with an ice bath, and vigorously stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min) under exposure to UV light for 3 h. After the
photochemical reaction, the lamp was turned off, and the sample solution
was cooled to −20 °C. 4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane
(5.0 mmol, 1.00 g) dissolved in CHCl3 (10 mL) and pyridine
(50 mmol, 4.0 mL) was sequentially added to the sample solution with
a syringe pump at this temperature. The sample solution was then evaporated
at 90 °C to remove the solvent. PPG with the average molecular
weight of 400 (5 mmol, 2.00 g) was injected into the sample with a
syringe pump, and the sample was stirred at 50 °C for 13 h. The
sample was washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure.
The residue was dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 2 h to give poly(MDI-PPG)
in 89% yield (2.91 g) as dark brown solid. The average molecular weight
was estimated by GPC in comparison with the polystyrene standard: Mw = 6200, Mn = 3600, Mw/Mn = 1.72. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 293 K) δ/ppm: 7.37
(m, 4H), 7.08 (m, 4H), 4.87 (s, 1H), 3.53–3.31 (m, 29H), 1.91–1.02
(m, 24H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 153.2, 137.8, 137.2, 135.4, 135.3, 129.2,
118.3, 79.2, 74.6, 72.4, 72.2, 71.2, 65.4, 20.2, 17.4. IR (ATR) ν
(cm–1): 3275, 3188, 3114, 3059, 2970, 2923, 1723,
1597, 1533, 1509, 1456, 1411, 1374, 1308, 1224, 1079, 927, 817, 754,
681.
8FHDI-2HFIP
A cylindrical flask, equipped with a low-pressure
mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged with CHCl3 (20 mL) and 8FHDA·2HCl (2 mmol, 0.68 g). The sample
was cooled at 0 °C with an ice bath and vigorously stirred upon
bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min) under exposure to UV light
for 3 h. After the photochemical reaction, the lamp was turned off,
and 2,6-lutidine (20 mmol, 2.3 mL) was slowly added to the sample
solution with a syringe pump. The sample solution was then evaporated
at 100 °C to remove the solvent. A mixture of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol
(8 mmol, 0.92 mL) and 2,6-lutidine (8 mmol, 0.92 mL) was injected
into the sample with a syringe pump, and the sample solution was stirred
at 50 °C for 20 h. The sample was washed with water and extracted
with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to
dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dried under vacuum
at 30 °C for 16 h to give 8FHDI-2HFIP in 37% yield (0.48 g) as
white powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 293 K)
δ/ppm: 5.68 (sep, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz), 5.40 (t,
NH), 3.98 (td, 4H, J = 15.2, 6.4 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm:
153.3, 121.0 (q, J = 282.8 Hz), 115.6 (m), 111.0
(m), 67.1 (m), 41.1 (m); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3, 293 K) δ/ppm: −73.6 (d, J = 5.3 Hz),
−118.8, −123.5 (m). IR (ATR) ν (cm–1): 3342, 3094, 2981, 1736, 1560, 1438, 1382, 1360, 1257, 1201, 1155,
1106, 1081, 1014, 924, 906, 872, 751, 734, 691, 650. HRMS (ESI orbitrap) m/z: [M – H]− calcd
for C14H7F20N2O4 647.0092; found 647.0083.
Poly(8FHDI-HD)
A cylindrical flask, equipped with a
low-pressure mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged
with CHCl3 (30 mL) and 8FHDA·2HCl (2 mmol, 0.68 g).
The sample was cooled at 0 °C with an ice bath and vigorously
stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min) under exposure
to UV light for 2 h. After the photochemical reaction, the lamp was
turned off, and 2,6-lutidine (20 mmol, 2.3 mL) was slowly added to
the sample solution with a syringe pump. The sample solution was then
evaporated at 90 °C to remove the solvent. 1,6-Hexanediol (2
mmol, 0.24 g) dissolved in CHCl3 (10 mL) was injected into
the sample with a syringe pump, and the sample solution was stirred
at 50 °C for 110 h. The sample was washed with water and extracted
with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to
dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dried under vacuum
at 60 °C for 2 h to give poly(8FHDI-HD) in 91% yield (0.81 g)
as brown powder. The average molecular weight was estimated by GPC
in comparison with the polystyrene standard: Mw = 4000, Mn = 2400, Mw/Mn = 1.66. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm:
3.99 (t, 4H, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.91 (td, J = 18.0, 6.4 Hz), 3.79 (td, J = 16.4, 6.0 Hz), 1.40–1.55
(m, 4H), 1.32 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 156.7, 154.7, 124.6, 106.9, 67.0,
64.4, 60.6, 45.2, 32.4, 32.4, 31.9, 27.9, 25.1; 19F NMR
(376 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm:
−118.1, −123.4. IR (ATR) ν (cm–1): 3322, 3072, 2944, 2868, 1698, 1543, 1474, 1425, 1267, 1221, 1155,
1125, 979, 862, 781, 734. Anal. calcd for [C14H18F8N2O4]: C, 39.08; H, 4.22; N, 6.51. Found: C, 39.53; H, 4.39; N, 6.23.
Poly(8FHDI-PPG)
A cylindrical flask, equipped with
a low-pressure mercury lamp and a magnetic stirring bar, was charged
with CHCl3 (30 mL) and 8FHDA·2HCl (2 mmol, 0.68 g).
The sample was cooled at 0 °C with an ice bath and vigorously
stirred upon bubbling with O2 (0.1 L/min) under exposure
to UV light for 2 h. After the photochemical reaction, the lamp was
turned off, and 2,6-lutidine (20 mmol, 2.3 mL) was slowly added to
the sample solution with a syringe pump. The sample solution was then
evaporated at 100 °C to remove the solvent. PPG with the average
molecular weight of 400 (2 mmol, 0.8 g) was injected into the sample
with a syringe pump, and the sample was stirred at 50 °C for
20 h. The sample was washed with water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced
pressure. The residue was dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 2 h
to give poly(8FHDI-PPG) in 86% yield (1.18 g) as a light brown solid.
The average molecular weight was estimated by GPC in comparison with
the polystyrene standard: Mw = 8800, Mn = 3400, Mw/Mn = 2.59. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 293 K) δ/ppm: 4.96 (br, 1H), 3.91 (br, 2H), 3.49 (m,
22H), 1.13–1.25 (m, 26H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: 156.1, 79.1, 74.7, 72.3,
71.0, 70.8, 70.2, 70.0, 65.2, 20.2, 17.0; 19F NMR (376
MHz, DMSO-d6, 293 K) δ/ppm: −119.0,
−123.7. IR (ATR) ν (cm–1): 3314, 2973,
2933, 2873, 1723, 1541, 1453, 1375, 1256, 1161, 1119, 942, 863, 827,
753, 680. Anal. calcd for [C14H18F8N2O5(C3H6O)5]: C, 47.24; H, 6.52; N, 3.80. Found:
C, 46.86; H, 6.51; N, 3.89.
Authors: Nathalie Busschaert; Isabelle L Kirby; Sarah Young; Simon J Coles; Peter N Horton; Mark E Light; Philip A Gale Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 15.336