The widespread use of broad-spectrum aminoglycoside antibiotics is restricted from various clinical applications due to the emergence of bacterial resistance and the adverse effects such as ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. The intensive applicability of nanoparticles in modern medicinal chemistry has gained the interest of researchers for modification of aminoglycosides as nanoconjugates either via covalent conjugation or physical interactions to alleviate their undesirable effects and bacterial resistance. In this context, various carbohydrates, polymers, lipids, silver, gold, and silica-attached aminoglycoside nanoparticles have been reported with improvements in physicochemical properties, bioavailability, and biocompatibility in physiological medium. Overall, this review encompassed the synthesis of nanostructured aminoglycosides and their applications in the development of new antibacterial therapeutics.
The widespread use of broad-spectrum aminoglycoside antibiotics is restricted from various clinical applications due to the emergence of bacterial resistance and the adverse effects such as ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. The intensive applicability of nanoparticles in modern medicinal chemistry has gained the interest of researchers for modification of aminoglycosides as nanoconjugates either via covalent conjugation or physical interactions to alleviate their undesirable effects and bacterial resistance. In this context, various carbohydrates, polymers, lipids, silver, gold, and silica-attached aminoglycoside nanoparticles have been reported with improvements in physicochemical properties, bioavailability, and biocompatibility in physiological medium. Overall, this review encompassed the synthesis of nanostructured aminoglycosides and their applications in the development of new antibacterial therapeutics.
Nanoscience
and its associated technology represent revolutionary
research in drug manufacturing, particularly, diagnostics, imaging,
and/or drug delivery at the cellular or atomic level. The discoveries
mainly focus on the enhancement of drug specificity to cells, the
efficacy of targeted drug delivery, and suitability of carriers for
drug distribution and drug toxicity reduction. The unique and well-defined
pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of nanomaterials[1] result from the effects of ultrasmall and well-behaved
quantum size, large surface by volume ratio, shape, functionalized
structure, surface charge, and unusual electrodynamic interactions
with the biological system, among other parameters. Likewise, the
tunable physicochemical properties of nanoparticles in addition to
crystallinity, electronic states, surface instability, surface roughness,
and radius of curvature contribute in different ways to greatly affect
their medicinal properties. In this regard, we understand from the
literature that nanostructured materials encourage the delivery of
drugs to a preferred site of action in the living organism, overcoming
biological barriers such as the blood–brain barrier as well
as intestinal, nasal, pulmonary, and skin barriers.[2] Even though the involvement of nanostructure materials
in different areas is well-recognized, the participation in the field
of antimicrobials is highly significant. Well-known clinically used
broad-spectrum bactericidal aminoglycoside antibiotics (AAs) are active
against aerobic Gram-negative as well as a few Gram-positive microorganisms
(Figure a) and are
used to treat opportunistic infections with AIDS, cystic fibrosis,
and cancer. Unfortunately, the extensive use of these aminoglycosides
is impeded by significant dose-related toxicities, poor adsorption
in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), low solubility and permeability
into the bacterial cell membrane, as well as the rapid rise of AA-resistant
strains around the world. The looming threat of aminoglycoside resistance
emerges because of enzymatic hydrolysis, target site modification,
impaired entry to the bacterial cell, and active AA efflux. Furthermore,
the global market for aminoglycosides was assessed at more than 1.1
billion USD in 2014, and it is predicted to grow at a CAGR (compound
annual growth rate) of more than 3.0% in the coming years, owing to
the rising prevalence of bacterial infections affected by Gram-positive
and Gram-negative bacteria (Figure B). Thus, access to aminoglycosides in a new state
with antibacterial activity, low toxicity, and smaller susceptibility
to aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes compared to those of their parent
structures is required.
Figure 1
(A) Aminoglycoside antibiotics. (B) Uses of
aminoglycosides in
North America between 2012 and 22 (millions in USD) (www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/aminoglycoside-market).
(A) Aminoglycoside antibiotics. (B) Uses of
aminoglycosides in
North America between 2012 and 22 (millions in USD) (www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/aminoglycoside-market).From a structural perspective,
aminoglycosides are polycationic
pseudo-oligosaccharides with an aminocyclitol/streptamine core linked
to an aminated sugar. The primary binding sites of AAs are the hydroxy
and amino groups, which engage in interaction with the A-site decoding
area of the bacterial 16S rRNA, causing cell death by inhibiting protein
synthesis. These groups are responsible for high-water solubility
and limited lipid solubility, in addition to their easy synthetic
modification. Several synthetic approaches to find the next generation
of AAs with improved biological and therapeutic functions have been
articulated mainly, fostering their uptake property modification or
enzymatic alteration for the mechanistic studies toward the resistance
of AAs with different multi-drug-resistant bacteria.[3] The benefits of current nanomedicine in an aspect of pharmacokinetic
and pharmacodynamic characteristics could lead to more effective actions.[4] We have witnessed the unique and customizable
features of nanomaterials that make the drugs easier to administer,
eliminating some shortcomings of traditional antibiotic therapies.
Thus, the use of nanomedicine and its associated technology could
modify the existing aminoglycosides to yield nanostructured aminoglycosides
for addressing the above-mentioned limitations of AAs. In this review
article, the synthesis and applications of nanostructured AAs are
presented.
Synthesis of Nanostructured Aminoglycosides
For the synthesis of nanostructured aminoglycosides, polymers,
lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, and carbohydrates (or saccharides)
as major groups of biomolecules are explored in addition to silica-,
iron-, silver-, and gold-based nanoparticles as carriers (Figure ). Even carbon dots
and quantum dots are subjected to the synthesis of aminoglycoside
nanoparticles.
Biocompatible/biodegradable naturally occurring
biomolecules and carbohydrates assist in the preparation of nanotherapeutics
because of their chemically well-defined structure, protein repellency,
high water solubility, and no aggregation properties.[5] An additional behavior of the carbohydrates is their ability
to self-assemble to form polymeric nanoparticles, which encapsulate/load
the AAs into nanostructured materials.Strategies and reactions
for the loading of aminoglycoside to chitosan nanoparticles based
on the shielding of the polyanionic characteristic of dextran to the
polycationic characteristic of aminoglycosides (Figure ).[6a] For AA-loaded
chitosan (CS) nanoparticles (NPs), the difference of drug, chitosan,
and dextran sulfate concentrations varied the size of nanoparticles
in the range of 492.23 to 779.37 nm, with positive zeta-potential.
With the representative loading efficiency of tobramycin (37.2%),
gentamicin (Gent), and streptomycin (SM) (∼58 to 63%), in vitro,
the nanoparticles sustain release >60% of drug into nanoparticles
after 6 h in pH 1.2 buffer in a sustained behavior. Nano-SM has reduced
bacilli growth by p = 0.01 in a mouse model infected
with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that
was as good as subcutaneously injected aqueous streptomycin at the
same dose (100 mg/kg). To crop more chitosan-based antibacterial films,
Hari and colleagues[6b] assorted streptomycin-loaded
starch nanoparticles (SS-NPs) with 1% chitosan and 1% gelatin, and
SS-NPs improved the crystallinity and controlled swelling of the chitosan–gelatin
film. These antimicrobial films inhibit Escherichia
coli by approximately 90% and Bacillus
subtilis by 80%, with a sustained release (60%) of
streptomycin for 10 days, indicating its clinical potentiality through
oral administration.
Figure 3
Diagram of the chitosan nanoparticle formation.
Diagram of the chitosan nanoparticle formation.Deacon et al.[7a] accessed
tobramycin-encapsulated
alginate/chitosan nanostructures that resulted in uniform size distribution
with 6:1.5:1.5 ratios of alginate, chitosan, and tobramycin, as determined
by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dynamic light scattering
(DLS) analysis. With 45% encapsulation efficiency, in vitro antimicrobial
activity of the nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 is similar to that of free tobramycin with a minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) 0.625 mg/L. In the in vivo model for P. aeruginosa infection, the survival rate is found
to be 90% upon injection of nanoparticles, inferring low nanoparticle
toxicity. Tobramycin nanostructures removed the lethal inoculum caused
by P. aeruginosa and doubled the survival
rates compared to those with free tobramycin. Adapting the ethanol
injection approach, Monteiro et al.[7b] prepared
a chitosan nanofiber mesh (NFM) through the reaction of covalently
immobilized SH groups of CS NFMs with liposomes. Gentamicin-loaded
liposomes were formed with a 17% success rate (Figure ). The random test indicated the immobilization
of liposomes (∼110 nm) on the surface of an electrospun CS
nanofiber with a diameter between 100 and 500 nm. The preservation
of electrospun CS NFMs and liposome structures was assigned from the
SEM analysis of CS NFM before liposome immobilization and after liposome
immobilization at the surface of an electrospun CS nanofiber. The
drug–NPs displayed a sustained release of gentamicin during
16 h, accomplishing a steady state at 24 h. The released drug worked
against Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, with MICs 0.25, 0.83, and 0.50 mg/L, respectively, along with MBC
2.00 mg/L for all of the strains. Another example of chitosan/fucoidan
nanoparticles (CS/F NPs) as carriers for gentamicin delivery was developed
by Huang and co-workers.[8a] The gentamicin-loaded
CS/F NPs (Gent-CS/F NPs) with a positive zeta-potential had an entrapment
efficiency (EE) > 90%, higher than that of the reported values
by
Balmayor et al.[8b] from starch-conjugated
CS NPs. Gent was encapsulated using the water/oil emulsion method
(EEs from 55 to 67.2%), whereas for the tripolyphosphate cross-linked
CS NPs, the EE of Gent loading was 61.7–87.2%.[8c] With sustained release for up to 72 h with 99% from biphasic
CS/F NPs, the bacterial inhibition against Klebsiella
pneumoniae by Gent-CS/F NPs (>96%) was lower than
that of free Gent (after 48 h, 80–90%). The intratracheal injection
of Gent-CS/F NPs (0.27 mg/kg) had an area under the concentration–time
curve/MIC ratio higher than that of the intravenous administration
of free Gent (0.5 mg/kg), showing the improvement of antibacterial
efficacy.
Figure 4
Attachment of liposomes with CS NFM and loading of gentamicin.
Attachment of liposomes with CS NFM and loading of gentamicin.
Aminoglycoside Antibiotic-Loaded
PEG, PLGA,
and TPGS Nanoparticles
For nanoparticle formation with unique
drug delivery properties, the biocompatible and biodegradable polymer
poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), which
is hydrophilic, highly water-soluble, nonimmunogenic, and nontoxic,
protein-resistant poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), and water-soluble nonionic
surfactant d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000
succinate (TPGS) are used.The kanamycin (KS) was encapsulated
by the PEGylated water-soluble chitosan (WSC), that is, cationic deacetylated
chitin NPs and PLGA-TPGS NPs. Interestingly, the KS-PEG-WSC NPs and
KS-PLGA-TPGS NPs increased blood circulation while lowering dosage
frequency.[9a] The WSC layer showed a significant
impact on the surface load, and zeta-potential was reported to be
near neutral at +3.61 mV. KS-PEG-WSC and KS-PLGA-TPGS NPs steadily
and consistently released 91.56% in 14 days and 93.26% in 21 days,
respectively.For the transformation of injectable streptomycin
to an oral version,
streptomycin-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles were made using the multiple
emulsion technique.[9b] The average particle
size of the drug-loaded NP was found to be 153.12 nm, and the drug
encapsulation efficiency was observed as ±4.08% with 14.28 ±
0.83% drug loading. Streptomycin was maintained in plasma for 4 days
and in organs for 7 days after a single oral dose of SM-PLGA nanoparticles
was applied to mice. Regarding the relative bioavailability, encapsulated
streptomycin was 21-fold higher than that of injectable drugs. In M. tuberculosis H37Rv-infected mice, eight doses
of the weekly oral streptomycin-loaded NPs were equivalent to 24 free
streptomycin intramuscular injections.Likewise, Akhtar et al.
designed intravenous gentamicin to oral
absorption through encapsulation to PLGA nanoparticles modified with
chitosan following water-in-oil-in-water formulations (w/o/w). The
nanoformulation shows sustained release with increasing residence
time to 11.22 ± 0.42 h and with the higher elimination half-life
value (∼6.23 h).[10a] These particles
were tested on plankton and biofilm crops of Gram-negative P. aeruginosa PA01 in vitro, as well as a peritoneal
96 h pattern of murine infections. With a MIC of 1.5 g/mL, free gentamicin
inhibited bacterial growth, whereas the formulations of w/o/w and
s/o/w (MIC of 3.0 g/mL) prevented the growth with efficacy lower than
that of the free drug.Gentamicin-AOT-loaded PLGA nanoparticles
have a mean diameter ranging
between 289.15 and 299.23 nm with a zeta-potential of −3.7
to 0.4 and −3.6 to 0.7 mV, respectively.[10b] In experimentally infected THP-1 monocytes, this gentamicin
formulation reduced Gram-negative Brucella melitensis infection (>2-log10 reduction), whereas in vivo investigations
showed
effectiveness in the liver and spleen for up to 4 days in infected
mice. Even though 14 doses of free gentamicin had no effect on infection,
only four doses of gentamicin-AOT-loaded nanoparticles reduced splenic
infection by 3.23 log in 50% of infected mice without causing any
adverse effects.Abdelghany et al. developed a controlled release
gentamicin formulation
in water/oil/water and solid/oil/water using PLGA nanoparticles for
treating Pseudomonas infections.[10c] Entrapment of a hydrophilic drug into a hydrophobic
PLGA polymer can be increased by lowering the pH of the formulation,
which reduces the hydrophilicity of the drug and thus improves entrapment,
reaching levels up to 22.4 g/mg PLGA. These particles had a regulated
release of gentamicin for up to 16 days under conventional incubation
settings and have a MIC and MBC higher than that of free Gent.Elfaky et al.[11a] reported the gentamicin
loading on nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) containing TPGS surfactant
to protect from gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. In vivo studies
with three groups of rabbits for 10 days revealed differences in plasma
creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium, and calcium between the control
and Gent-NLC materials considerably lower than those with gentamicin,
confirming the protective effect on kidney function. Amikacin-loaded
PLGA nanoparticles were synthesized[11b] by
Sabaeifard et al. utilizing a solid-in-oil-in-water emulsion process
with varied ratios of 50:50 PLGA/drug (100:3.5, 80:3.5, and 60:3.5)
as well as a stabilizer (Pluronic F68) (0.5 or 1%). The drug encapsulation
efficiency was 76.8%, and from the release kinetic study, 50% of the
encapsulated drug was released within 1 h of incubation. No toxicity
against RAW macrophages was observed in cell viability/cytotoxicity
assays after 2 and 24 h of treatment. The slow-released drug from
NPs showed activity 4 times lower than that of the free drug.A synthetic block copolymer containing Pluronic-based core–shell
nanostructures was synthesized by Ranjan and co-workers.[12a] With a 20% antibiotic loading in their formulation,
the toxicity and adverse effects of this core–shell nanostructure
encapsulating gentamicin, as well as the percentage of viable bacteria
in the liver and spleen, were reduced. The anionic homo- and block
copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide-b-sodium acrylate)
(PEO-b-PAA–Na+) or poly(ethylene
oxide-b-sodium methacrylate) (PEO-b-PMA–Na+) were blended with PAA–Na+-based polyanions to get stable nanoplexes
at physiological pH following gentamicin encapsulation through electrostatic
interactions (Figure ).[12b] Gentamicin was also incorporated
(at a rate of 26% by weight) into macromolecular complexes with an
average diameter of 120 nm and a zeta-potential of −17 mV.
These nanocomplexes can potentially enhance the attack of the intracellular
pathogen Salmonella. The nephrotoxic
profile of gentamicin nanoparticles was compared to that of free gentamicin
by Jamshidzadeh et al.[12c] Furthermore,
Mugabe and colleagues developed[12d] liposome-encapsulated
gentamicin, which was less toxic than free gentamicin and showed high
efficiency against dispersed Salmonella infections in mice. In rats and mice, the mean half-life of liposome-encapsulated
gentamicin sulfate produced from egg phosphatidylcholine in serum
was 4 times longer than that of free gentamicin in intravenous injection.
This liposome encapsulation exhibited increased and extended activity
in reticuloendothelial cells, particularly in the spleen and liver.
In mice with acute septicemia, the liposomal formulation outperformed
free medicines in terms of preventive activity.
Figure 5
Gentamicin-loaded anionic
homo- and block copolymers.
Gentamicin-loaded anionic
homo- and block copolymers.Conjugation of gentamicin to the hydrophobic block polymer POEGMA-b-PVBA containing aldehyde groups through Schiff base formation
with gentamicin produced an amphiphilic block copolymer closely related
to polyethylene glycol. Core cross-linked star polymers reacted with
NO to form a polymer containing a N-diazeniumdiolate
(NONOate) group that release NO in a regulated manner for a few days
and formed dispersed biofilms. The DLS results showed a good polydispersity
index (PDI 0.1) and a number-average size (15 nm) that agree well
with the TEM data (Figure ). According to Nguyen et al., the conjugate effectively reduced
the viability of P. aeruginosa biofilms
by more than 90 and 94% (p < 0.0001) in planktonic
phases, respectively, compared to free gentamicin (at 10 mM, only
7 and 5% reduction).[13a]
Figure 6
Synthesis of Gent-NONOate
nanoparticles via RAFT polymerization.
Synthesis of Gent-NONOate
nanoparticles via RAFT polymerization.Amphiphilic diblock copolymers comprising a hydrophilic PEG block
and a hydrophobic block containing enzyme-cleavable self-immolative
side linkages was investigated by Li and associates.[13b] After 4 h of penicillin G amidase (PGA) incubation, morphological
changes of vesicles from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis
revealed the coexistence of PP2 LCVs with spherical nanoparticles,
and in the next 12 h, large compound vesicles (LCVs) were almost wiped
out and formed hollow nanostructures, and after 24 h, only spherical
nanoparticles remained. The released gentamicin from PGA-responsive
large compound vesicle (PP2 LCV) bilayers against P.
aeruginosa demonstrated the same growth inhibitory
impact as free gentamicin at concentrations greater than 1.0 g/mL.Self-polymerizable organic biopolymer, polydopamine (PDA), was
tethered to gentamicin, kanamycin, and neomycin to obtain PDA–AA
nanoconjugates under alkaline conditions (Tris buffer, pH 8.5) at
50 °C via Schiff base formation and Michael addition reaction
(Figure ).[14a] Out of these three nanoconjugates, PDA–kanamycin
was the most potent pathogen active and less toxic in human embryonic
kidney cells (HEK293), although more toxic to human glioblastoma cells
(U87). Nanoconjugates had antibacterial and anticancer effects greater
than those of free drugs, although they were toxic to the cell line.
Figure 7
Structure
of polydopamine–aminoglycoside nanoconjugates.
Structure
of polydopamine–aminoglycoside nanoconjugates.Ultrathin nanocapsules were prepared successfully by Majumdar[14b] upon coating of sodium alginate/polyallylamine
hydrochloride (PAH) multilayers and loaded with gentamicin sulfate
in the multilayer polyelectrolyte system to achieve a prolonged action
of the drug. The average capsule size of the formulation was 400 nm,
and the various parameters involved in the creation and optimization
of the capsules were used. In capsular suspension, the maximal drug
loading was reported to be 25.45% w/v (where 1.0 mL of capsular suspension
contains 5000 capsules). In vitro, the total drug release was determined
to be 65.91%. With each coating step, the capsule’s zeta-potential
alternates between −19.7 mV (Na-alginate) and +29.8 mV (PAH),
indicating multilayered particle development.
Polymer matrices are hydrogels that swell but do
not dissolve in water.[15a] Nanogels are
nanoparticles made up of a hydrogel that has been physically or chemically
cross-linked with hydrophilic polymer chains. Due to the tunable chemical
and physical structure, good mechanical properties, biocompatibility,
and high water content, these hydrogels have been extensively studied
in the biomedical field.Nanogels comprising polycationic chitosan
and inorganic polyanion sodium tripolyphosphate was fabricated by
Zabihian et al.[15b] The nanocarriers were
homogeneous in distribution and had a considerable polydispersity
index (0.3), with an average size of about 250 nm (unloaded) and 493
nm (gentamicin-loaded). The drug loading efficiency ranged between
28 and 32%, and Gent gradually and continuously released (∼90%)
over 24 h. In MIC and potency testing, the antibacterial activity
of gentamicin-loaded nanoparticles was not significantly diminished.
The gentamicin’s rapid burst release from nanogels unravelled
the use of PVP as a physical “reinforcing agent”.
Silica Nanoparticles for Aminoglycoside Nanohybrids
In 2008, He and collaborators developed native SiO2–gentamicin
nanoparticles and gentamicin-loaded SiO2 nanohybrids. The
nanoparticles demonstrated the dose-dependent cell viability assay
of SaOS-2 which is reduced both by SiO2–gentamicin
nanohybrids and native SiO2 NPs in the cell counting kit-8
(CCK-8) assay.[16a] In the case of osteogenesis,
the osteogenic differentiating capacity of SaOS-2 cells is not influenced
by SiO2–gentamicin nanohybrids or native SiO2 NPs at a concentration range of 31.25–125 μg/mL
and the concentrations of 9.65 μg/mL for free gentamicin.An additional SiO2–gentamicin nanohybrid for
potential antimicrobial administration in orthopedic applications,
developed by Mosselhy et al.,[16b] exhibited
rapid release (21.4%) within the first 24 h and then 43.9% release
in vitro in 5 days. This nanohybrid showed the most powerful antimicrobial
activity against B. subtilis compared
to that against P. fluorescens and E. coli. Filter-sterilized gentamicin has a MIC of
6.26 g/mL against P. fluorescens and E. coli, which is the quantity of gentamicin released
from the 250 g/mL SiO2–gentamicin nanohybrids. Free
gentamicin-treated bacterial cells were completely deteriorated rather
than bacterial cells treated with SiO2–gentamicin
nanohybrids, according to the TEM monographs.Epoxy groups were
introduced on the silica nanoparticles using
3-glycidyloxy propyl trimethoxysilane, followed by functionalization
with gentamicin, neomycin, or kanamycin for the synthesis of aminoglycoside-conjugated
silica nanoparticles (Figure ) as described by Agnihotri et al.[16c] The attachment was measured by the increase in average size from
160 to 223 nm from native silica nanoparticles to epoxy–silica
nanoparticles, which increased further following conjugation with
aminoglycosides such gentamicin (256 nm), neomycin (298 nm), and kanamycin
(269 nm). Limited cytotoxicity and antibacterial efficacy of functionalized
silica NPs against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well
as kanamycin-resistant E. coli strain
was found. Compared to native silica NPs, all the AA–silica
nanoparticles showed significantly lower MICs but higher than that
of free AAs. This may be attributable to the conjugation of aminoglycosides
with active silica NPs in which a few primary amines are converted
into secondary amines with charge density lower than that of primary
amines.
Figure 8
Structure of aminoglycoside-conjugated silica nanoparticles.
Structure of aminoglycoside-conjugated silica nanoparticles.
Aminoglycoside-Coated Metal
Nanoparticles
Aminoglycoside-Coated Iron
Nanoparticles
The synthesized magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs)
prepared from coprecipitation
of Fe2+ and Fe3+ iron salts in an alkali medium
were coated with chitosan to form CS–MNPs, and subsequently,
streptomycin was loaded to produce a strep-CS-MNP nanocomposite. X-ray
diffraction was used to characterize CS–MNPs and nanocomposites.
Later, the streptomycin-coated chitosan–magnetic (strep–CS–MNP)
nanocomposite preparation[17a] was modified,
and the permanent magnet was used to isolate strep–CS–MNP.
Initially, the nanocomposite displayed a rapid release, but it became
slower over time and reached 100% after 350 min, following the pseudo-second-order
model for this release. The nanocomposite, strep–CS–MNP,
exhibited antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). El-Say and El-Sawy highlighted
in a separate paper that polymeric NPs, as opposed to metal-based
NPs, have several advantages, including low toxicity, biocompatibility,
biodegradability, and environmental friendliness. Tobramycin was delivered
stably and effectively by binding to alginate that had been functionalized
with DNase I before being encapsulated in chitosan NPs.[17b] Additionally, the antibacterial activity of
the synthesized streptomycin-loaded chitosan-coated magnetic nanocomposites
was assessed by El Zowalaty et al.[17c] (Figure ).
Figure 9
Chemical structure of
the SM-coated nanocomposite.
Chemical structure of
the SM-coated nanocomposite.Grumezescu et al.[18a] prepared a nanocarrier
based on CS, poly(vinyl alcohol), and Fe3O4.
Kanamycin was loaded into a water-dispersible metal oxide nanobiocomposite
to increase active drug delivery, lowering the MIC of kanamycin by
2-fold (S. aureus) to 4-fold (E. coli) when compared to free kanamycin. The nanobiocomposite
had a very minimal hazardous effect on eukaryotic cells in a cytotoxicity
test.Based on the electrostatic interactions of gentamicin
with protonated
chitosan and PEG (polyethylene glycol), Wang and colleagues[18b] studied the preparation of chitosan/Fe3O4@poly(ethylene glycol)–gentamicin NPs
for drug entry through the bacterial membrane. PEG dicarboxylic acid
was employed to improve the dispersity of Fe3O4 NP as it contains adequate carboxyl groups for binding. In an acidic
environment, the CS and PEG of Fe3O4@PEG-Gent
were protonated to impart a positive charge to the NP surface, facilitating
interaction with the negatively charged bacterial cell membrane and
displaying greater antibacterial activity over the free drug. Functionalized
magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4@PEG-Gent) are
biocompatible with normal cells and effective against planktonic bacteria
and biofilms. These nanocomposites could penetrate the mature S. aureus biofilm with the help of a magnetic field
due to the superparamagnetic properties of Fe3O4 NPs, leading to the successful delivery of gentamycin for biofilm
eradication (Figure ).
Figure 10
Schematic diagram of (A) Fe3O4@PEG-Gent nanoparticle
formation. (B) Biofilms treated with Fe3O4@PEG-Gent
nanoparticles in the absence and presence of a magnetic field.
Schematic diagram of (A) Fe3O4@PEG-Gent nanoparticle
formation. (B) Biofilms treated with Fe3O4@PEG-Gent
nanoparticles in the absence and presence of a magnetic field.
Aminoglycoside-Coated Silver
Nanoparticles
Caglayan and Onur devised a colorimetric silver
nanoparticle sensor
to determine aminoglycosides in milk.[19a] The yellow color of silver transformed into orange and red in proportion
to the amounts of analytes. The decrease in absorbance of silver nanoparticles
at 394 nm was used to conduct quantitative measurements of AAs in
milk. Gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin have linear ranges of detection
at 20–60, 23–60, and 60–100 ng/mL, respectively.
AgNPs were also made by Ghodake et al.[19b] for colorimetric detection of aminoglycoside antibiotics in water,
serum, and milk samples, with picomolar-level sensitivity to streptomycin.Habash et al.[19c] explored tobramycin-loaded
tiny citrate-coated silver NPs to inhibit the formation of P. aeruginosa biofilm, in which the NPs significantly
increased the interaction of tobramycin with the cell membrane and
biofilm. The synergistic effect of tobramycin activity was greater
for smaller AgNPs (10–20 nm) at inhibiting biofilms working
through cellular membrane disruptions, according to minimum biofilm
eradication concentration experiment using clinical P. aeruginosa isolates, and this synergistic effect
is likely a strain-dependent phenomenon. Due to the synergism with
the aminoglycoside capping agent, the produced silver NPs outperformed
those capped with citrate or SDS in antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus, according to Kora and Rastogi.[20a] The
antibacterial and osteogenic properties of Gent-loaded AgNPs coated
with silk fiber (SF) to address Ti-implant-associated infection and
poor osseointegration issues were investigated by Zhou et al.[20b] In this study, the SF-based film was precomposed
using two methods: dip-coating chitosan (DCS) and spin-coating chitosan
(SCS) barrier layers. The antibacterial activity of the multilayer
coating with the SCS layer was good, whereas the improvement in the
DCS coating was restricted. Furthermore, the pH-dependent release
behavior of the Ag and the bioactive SCS layer enriched adhesion,
migration, and proliferation of preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells as well
as osteoblast difference. Katva and collaborators[21a] presented that the combination of gentamicin and chloramphenicol
with AgNPs has a superior antibacterial outcome in multi-drug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis compared to that with free
antibiotics. Similarly, McShan et al.[21b] noticed the synergistic effect of neomycin with AgNPs with an enhanced
antibacterial activity at concentrations below the MIC of either the
NPs or the antibiotic and dose-dependent Salmonella
typhimurium DT104 growth inhibition is observed for
neomycin–AgNPs with IC50 0.43 μg/mL.
Gold nanoparticles are widely acknowledged as attractive drug delivery
possibilities because of their unique dimensions, varying surface
functionalities, and regulated drug release.[22] The mixture of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and negative citrate ligands
capped with polycationic ribostamycin aminoglycoside antibiotics showed
unique properties.[22] The interaction between
ribostamycin and AuNPs was examined at various doses using a combination
of AuNPs of various sizes, and ribostamycin was determined using a
dark-field optical microscopic study. Ribostamycin formed linear oligomers
at higher concentrations, resulting in the formation of rod-like negative
AuNPs. The antibacterial effect of ribostamycin, amikacin, and similar
structural antibiotics may be directly related to the efficacy of
the drug itself (Figure ).
Figure 11
Interaction of self-assemble ribostamycin and citrate-capped
AuNPs.
Interaction of self-assemble ribostamycin and citrate-capped
AuNPs.Wang et al.[23a] synthesized unmodified
gold nanoparticles for a sensitive and selective colorimetric biosensor
to detect gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin antibiotics in milk
and pharmaceuticals. Rad and co-workers[23b] constructed gold nanoparticles coupled with aminoglycosides with
a size of 10 nm to resist multi-drug-resistant, extensive drug resistance,
and pan-drug-resistant bacteria. The antibacterial activity of the
nanoconjugates of gentamicin and amikacin with gold against Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from burn wound
infections was evaluated, and it was found that the conjugated amikacin
had strong antibacterial activity (94.5%), whereas gentamicin had
50% efficacy. Payne et al.[23c] loaded the
kanamycin on the surface of AuNPs, which enabled the delivery of cytosol
and bactericidal to S. epidermidis and Enterobacter aerogenes to prevent robust growth of
multi-drug-resistant bacteria. The one-step synthesis of capped KS-AuNPs
has dose-dependent widespread antibacterial activity against Gram-positive,
Gram-negative, and kanamycin-resistant bacteria, though KS-AuNPs have
amplified toxicity to primate cell line bacteria (Vero 76). According
to transmission electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy, KS-AuNPs
increased their effectiveness by disrupting the bacterial membrane,
causing cytoplasmic leakage and cell death. In all of the bacteria
tested, the MIC was significantly lower when compared to that of free
kanamycin.Roshmi et al.[24a] utilized Bacillus sp. SJ 14 (KJ451478) from the soil of jewelry
sites for gold nanoparticle biosynthesis. The antibiotic-coated biogenic
gold nanoparticles were tested against S. epidermidis 152 and vancomycin-bound AuNPs against S. hemolyticus 41, indicating that all AuNP-conjugated antibiotics had significantly
lower MICs than their free forms, except for rifampicin-bound AuNPs.
Mu and colleagues[24b] developed gold nanoparticles
conjugated with chitosan–streptomycin (CS–SM), which
easily passed through biofilm and cell membrane barriers, inhibiting
biofilm formation, and eliminating P. aeruginosa preformed biofilm. It can kill both Gram-positive and Gram-negative
bacteria (Listeria monocytogenes, S. aureus, S. typhimurium, and E. coli). After RAW264.7 cells
were treated with the CS–SM conjugate and L.
monocytogenes was visualized with fluorescence microscopy,
there was a substantial reduction in the number of beneficial bacteria
in a time-dependent manner (Figure ).
Figure 12
Chitosan–streptomycin conjugate.
Chitosan–streptomycin conjugate.In another experiment, CS–SM conjugates were produced
for
bacterial research. CS–SM-1 was formed by reduction of HAuCl4 with NaBH4 to form bare AuNPs, which were then
mixed with CS, whereas CS–SM-2 was developed by chemical reduction
of HAuCl4/CS mixtures with sodium borohydride. They show
λmax at 531 and 545 nm in their absorption spectra,
respectively. According to DLS measurements, the sizes of CS–SM-1
and CS–SM-2 were found to be 31 and 45 nm, with positive surface
potentials of 18.7 and 25.0 mV, respectively. Bacterial TSB solutions
(∼108 CFU (colony-forming units)) were embedded
in 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates to allow biofilm formation.
These CS–SM NPs have retained their ability to kill 300 biofilms
and prevent Gram-positive bacteria from forming biofilms. In a similar
concentration, CS–SM NPs also had better bactericidal effects
on both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria when compared to
those of the CS–SM conjugate or free streptomycin.[24c,24d]Per the report of Bhattacharya and colleagues,[25a] the conjugation of streptomycin and kanamycin
to AuNPs
enlarge the particle size of AuNPs, and according to the strength
distribution plot, conjugated NPs are polydispersed, whereas the pure
one is monodispersed. The MICs for drug conjugated AuNPs were significantly
lower in all cases. Antibiotic stability improved as a result of the
antibiotics’ strong bond with AuNPs, which enhanced the antibiotics’
bond energy. Nirmala Grace and Pandian confirmed amine group chelation
of aminoglycosides with small AuNPs (15 nm).[25b] The development of the gold–drug complex was guided by the
replacement of citrate with aminoglycosidic antibiotics. The TEM images
indicated nanoparticle aggregation with an average size of 15–20
nm, and the color change and shift in plasmon absorption to longer
wavelengths at 670 nm in the UV–vis spectrum also established
the same. The antibacterial activities through growth inhibition of S. aureus, Micrococcus luteus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa with drug-coated gold nanoparticles were higher than those of pure
gold nanoparticles. The nanoparticles enhance the antibacterial activity
against E. coli.Ahangari et
al.[26a] reported that gentamicin
was conjugated onto AuNPs according to the method described by Huang.
The color change from wine red to purple-blue of gold nanospheres
of 10–12 nm diameter confirmed the conjugation. Biodistribution
tests on BALB/c mice infected with S. aureus discovered that gentamicin-conjugated AuNPs were well retained in
the bacterial infection site. The antibacterial activity of conjugated
nanoparticles (0.09375 mg/mL) has more potential than free gentamicin
(0.1875 mg/mL). To detect the kanamycin contamination in food, Sharma
et al.[26b] developed a highly sensitive
“turn-off/turn-on” biosensor using the intrinsic peroxidase-like
activity of AuNPs. Saha et al.[26c] described
the direct conjugation of streptomycin, kanamycin, and ampicillin
to AuNPs. The TEM analysis revealed that the AuNPs conjugated to antibiotics
produce larger particles. In SEM analysis, streptomycin conjugation
has a rectangular rod shape, whereas kanamycin is stretched into star-like
structures. For AuNP-conjugated streptomycin, the MICs were 7 and
14 μg/mL (50% reduction) and for kanamycin; these were 12 and
30 μg/mL (60% reduction) in E. coli DH5a.
Quantum-Dot-Based Nanoparticles
Li et al.[27] synthesized a polyamine-functionalized
carbon quantum dots (CQDs) by applying a hydrothermal treatment of
citric acid and branched polyethylenimine with different molecular
weights following attachment of gentamicin through carbonization (Figure ). The high-resolution
transmission electron microscopy revealed well-dispersed and narrow
size distribution of particle with sizes ranging from 2.0 to 8.0 nm
and a lattice spacing distance of 0.22 nm, which is like graphite
(100) facets. The MICs of gentamicin sulfate-derived carbon quantum
dots (CQD-Gents) by carbonization at 150 °C are almost similar
to MIC of gentamicin against S. aureus (0.18 μg/mL) or E. coli (3
μg/mL), though above 190–200 °C, loss of antibacterial
activity occurred. The toxicity of the synthesizing CQDs is low toward
mammalian cells; even at a concentration of 2000 mg mL–1, more than 91% of cells are viable, which is approximately 40000
times the MIC for S. aureus. After
10 min of treatment with CQD180, the cell morphology becomes irregular,
and the bacterial membranes are destroyed in all directions, indicating
the CQD180’s ability to kill bacteria by disrupting their cell
membranes, implying an additional mode of antibacterial action.
Figure 13
Gentamicin
sulfate-derived carbon quantum dots.
Gentamicin
sulfate-derived carbon quantum dots.As a target to find bacterial biofilm, carbon dot PLGA-based hybrid
nanoparticles (CQD-PLGA) as drug delivery systems were investigated
by Huang et al.[28a] and processed with modulation
of CQD content in the formulation applying microfluidic method. The
TEM and DLS data indicate the narrow size distribution, and the size
and zeta-potential are in the range of 100 to 150 nm and −20
to −50 mV, respectively. The drug loading into the CQD-PLGA
was approximately 12–14%, and the encapsulated tobramycin delivered
sustained release for up to ∼72 h. The near-infrared radiation
releases 55% of the drug during 7 h. The nanoparticles’ good
biocompatibility with eukaryotic cells and low cytotoxicity and the
chemo-photothermal therapy against bacterial biofilms might be useful
in a future application.The amikacin conjugation with fluorescent
carbon dot (CQDs@amikacin)
nanoparticles was performed by applying hydrothermal carbonization
of amikacin and diammonium hydrogen citrate. The synthesized CQDs@amikacin
are uniformly dispersed. The average particle size ranges from 1.5
to 4 nm, and the maximum size of CQDs@amikacin is 2.5 nm. Chandra
et al.[28b] have observed that there is no
diffraction phase in the selected area electron diffraction pattern
of CQDs@amikacin, conforming the particles as amorphous, and field-emission
SEM images reveal its spherical morphology. The CQDs@amikacin detect E. coli in a linear range of 3.904 × 105 to 7.625 × 102 CFU/mL, with a detection limit
of 552 CFU/mL, and here, amikacin works as a binding ligand toward E. coli. They also detect E. coli from apple juice, orange juice, and pineapple juice. Hence, this
fluorescent carbon dot conjugated to amikacin might be used in the
future to detect E. coli in other samples.
Aminoglycoside-Loaded Graphene
A new method by Pandey
et al.[29] for
the loading of gentamicin sulfate on a methanol-derived graphene (MDG)
nanosheet was synthesized via the wet chemical route. At pH 3, the
release of the drug was 62.75% following a diffusion-dominated release
mechanism. The X-ray diffraction analysis resulted in a broad peak
at ∼26°, that is, close to the interplanar spacing of
the close-packed planes in graphite (0.34 nm) in addition to a new
peak arising at ∼11° (0.74 nm spacing). The drug-loaded
graphene nanoplatform reduced E. coli’s growth, resulting in a viability loss of up to 82.2% compared
to that with graphene alone (43.5% viability loss with 40 mg/mL).
The gentamicin drug-loaded MDG nanomatrix demonstrated a strong antibacterial
effect due to the synergistic effect of the drug and MDG. Furthermore,
the controlled release provides a method for creating innovative graphene-based
nanohybrids for the treatment of a variety of topical infections.
Overall, the synthesis and bioactivities of the aminoglycoside-conjugated
nanoparticles are summarized in Table S1.
Conclusions and Outlook
In this review article,
we highlighted the research and studies
on the preparation of nanostructured aminoglycoside antibiotics for
future drug therapy. The use of nanoscale drug delivery devices is
one of the burgeoning areas of research. Significant efforts continue
in nanoparticle-based drug delivery that works via a similar mechanism
of action; therefore, the research directions have moved toward the
investigation of aminoglycosides to reduce toxicity, increase drug
availability, and lower doses. Liposomes, lipids, carbohydrates, gold,
silver, silicon, and other novel nanoparticle carriers are likely
to play an important role in incorporating kanamycin, neomycin, streptomycin,
gentamicin, and amikacin into the nanoparticles. Most of these AA-based
nanoparticles are mainly studied in vitro, and a few are studied with
in vivo assay; hence, more studies are essential for excellent clinical
findings, particularly in terms of the lab to clinic transfer. We
anticipate that the nanostructured aminoglycosides demonstrated by
researchers around the world might escalate the development of new
therapeutics.
Authors: Nelson Monteiro; Margarida Martins; Albino Martins; Nuno A Fonseca; João N Moreira; Rui L Reis; Nuno M Neves Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Mohamed Ezzat El Zowalaty; Samer Hassan Hussein Al Ali; Mohamed I Husseiny; Benjamin M Geilich; Thomas J Webster; Mohd Zobir Hussein Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2015-04-30
Authors: Ashish Ranjan; Nikorn Pothayee; Mohammed N Seleem; Ronald D Tyler; Bonnie Brenseke; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Judy S Riffle; Ramanathan Kasimanickam Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2009-12-29