| Literature DB >> 35187053 |
Kaiyuan Liu1, Yuxin Liao1, Dong Yang1, Tianyang Xu1, Qiuming Gao1, Wenwei Jiang1, Lin Fan1, Pengfei Zan2, Guodong Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that subluxating patellar during minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA) would affect intraoperative soft tissue balance and postoperative clinical outcome.Entities:
Keywords: MIS-TKA; clinical effectiveness; gap balance; patellar position; soft tissue balance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35187053 PMCID: PMC8855054 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.692072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Figure 1The matching rectangle is used to record the line, and the external osteotomy angle of the femoral posterior condyle is adjusted according to this scribe line with a gap balance technique.
Figure 2Postoperative CT of knee. The STEA (surgical transepicondylar axis) represents the axis of rotation of the original femur of the knee, while the PCL (posterior condyle line) of the prosthesis can be regarded as the axis of rotation of the prosthesis. The femoral prothesis rotation angle reflects the difference of the femoral prosthesis rotation axis with the surgical transepicondylar axis.
Figure 3The Offset-Repo-Tensor and the Torque Wrench.
Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, mean ± SD (years) | 66.8 ± 7.4 | 68.3 ± 9.1 | 0.363 |
| Sex (female/male) | 78/15 | 83/13 | 0.573 |
| BMI, mean ± SD | 22.1 ± 1.6 | 21.5 ± 2.0 | 0.117 |
| Center/right | 45/48 | 49/47 | 0.817 |
| KSS, mean ± SD | 41.6 ± 10.1 | 42.1 ± 9.0 | 0.806 |
| ROM, mean ± SD(°) | 102.6°± 9.2° | 103.7°± 10.0° | 0.580 |
| VAS, mean ± SD | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 5.3 ± 1.6 | 0.419 |
| Femoral rotational alignment, mean ± SD(°) | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 0.289 |
| mFTA, mean ± SD (°) | 7.6 ± 2.9 | 7.3 ± 2.4 | 0.652 |
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; KSS, Knee Society Score; ROM, range of motion; VAS, visual analog scale; mFTA, mechanical femoral axis–to–tibial axis angle.
Comparison of intraoperative balance between the two groups.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gap at extension(mm) | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 10.4 ± 0.4 | 0.654 |
| Varus angle at extension(°) | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 0.247 |
| Gap at flexion (90°) (mm) | 10.7 ± 0.4 | 10.6 ± 0.3 | 0.309 |
| Varus angle at flexion (90°) (°) | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 0.096 |
The group B values here were measured with patellar reduction. Values are the means ± standard deviation.
Comparison of balance before and after reduction of patella in group B.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gap at extension(mm) | 10.4 ± 0.4 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 0.253 |
| Varus angle at extension(°) | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.188 |
| Gap at flexion (90°) (mm) | 10.6 ± 0.3 | 11.0 ± 0.4 | <0.001 |
| Varus angle at flexion (90°) (°) | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | <0.001 |
Values are the means ± standard deviation.
means there is significant difference between groups.
Comparison of postoperative imaging parameters between the two groups.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral prosthesis rotational alignment(°) | 0.12 ± 1.3 | −0.53 ± 1.3 | 0.005 |
| mFTA(°) | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 0.096 |
Values are the means ± standard deviation.
mFTA, mechanical femoral axis–to–tibial axis angle.
means there is significant difference between groups.
Comparison of postoperative KSS, VAS, ROM between the two groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KSS | Group A | 48 | 41.6 ± 10.1 | 73.3 ± 9.1 | 80.3 ± 10.3 | 84.7 ± 5.6 | 88.5 ± 5.1 | <0.001 |
| Group B | 49 | 42.1 ± 9.0 | 72.1 ± 8.0 | 80.1 ± 11.3 | 85.8 ± 7.9 | 87.1 ± 6.3 | <0.001 | |
|
| - | 0.806 | 0.505 | 0.916 | 0.461 | 0.264 | - | |
| VAS | Group A | 48 | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 3.8 ± 1.6 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| Group B | 49 | 5.3 ± 1.6 | 4.7 ± 1.5 | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | <0.001 | |
|
| - | 0.419 | 0.008 | 0.648 | 0.831 | 0.475 | - | |
| ROM | Group A | 48 | 102.6 ± 9.2 | 109.7 ± 8.4 | 116.5 ± 9.6 | 118.7 ± 9.4 | 122.8 ± 8.6 | <0.001 |
| Group B | 49 | 103.7 ± 10.0 | 104.9 ± 8.4 | 116.1 ± 8.7 | 117.8 ± 8.5 | 121.3 ± 9.6 | <0.001 | |
|
| - | 0.580 | 0.006 | 0.831 | 0.641 | 0.417 | - |
KSS, Knee Society Score; ROM, range of motion; VAS, visual analog scale.
means there is significant difference between groups.
Figure 4The tibial plateau was taken as the reference for the femoral posterior condylar cut using the gap-balance technique (A). After subluxating the patellar (B), varus angle of joint gap was smaller, so the inscribed line created by using the matching rectangular block parallel to the tibial plateau adds an internal rotation. This eventually caused the femoral prothesis to be placed internally rotated.