| Literature DB >> 35186821 |
Xiaomin He1, Bozhong Shi1, Zhiying Song1, Yanjun Pan1, Kai Luo1, Qi Sun1, Zhongqun Zhu1, Zhiwei Xu1, Jinghao Zheng1, Zhifang Zhang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal management for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) is controversial. We applied different surgical strategies based on individual variations in our single-centered practice over 10 years, aming to describe the mid-term results.Entities:
Keywords: Fontan palliation; anatomic correction; ccTGA; congenital heart disease; mid-term outcomes; surgical strategies
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186821 PMCID: PMC8850704 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.791475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Baseline characteristics stratified by different surgical strategies.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Sex (male/female) | 25/16 | 6/5 | 21/17 | 0.853 |
| Age (month) | 30.0 ± 21.4 | 48.6 ± 17.4 | 51.5 ± 19.1 |
|
| Weight (kg) | 12.5 ± 4.4 | 13.5 ± 2.7 | 16.4 ± 3.9 |
|
| LVEF (%) | 64.0 (62.0, 67.0) | 61.0 (58.0, 66.0) | 65.0 (62.0–68.0) | 0.224 |
|
| ||||
| Situs inversus | 0 | 1 (9.0%) | 2 (5.3%) | 0.225 |
| Dextrocardia | 3 (7.3%) | 3 (27.3%) | 9 (23.7%) | 0.090 |
| Mesocardia | 6 (14.6%) | 3 (27.3%) | 13 (34.2%) | 0.126 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| VSD | 38 (92.7%) | 11 (100%) | 34 (89.5%) | 0.057 |
| LVOTO/PS | 18 (43.9%) | 8 (72.7%) | 34 (89.5%) | 0.512 |
| Ebstein anomaly | 3 (7.3%) | 3 (27.3%) | 3 (7.9%) | 0.125 |
| PH | 10 (24.4%) | 3 (27.3%) | 5 (13.2%) |
|
| CoA/AA hypoplasia | 1 (2.4%) | 1 (9.1%) | 1 (2.6%) | 0.374 |
| CAVC | 0 | 0 | 4 (10.5%) | 0.057 |
| LSVC | 0 | 2 (18.2%) | 3 (7.9%) | 0.225 |
| Congenital heart block | 2 (4.9%) | 0 | 0 | 0.295 |
| Straddling of TV | 0 | 0 | 4 (10.5%) | 0.057 |
| Moderate TR | 17 (41.5%) | 6 (54.5%) | 11 (28.9%) | 0.245 |
| Severe TR | 5 (12.2%) | 2 (18.2%) | 4 (10.5%) | 0.792 |
LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; VSD, ventricular septal defect; LVOTO, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; PS, pulmonary stenosis; PH, pulmonary hypertension; CoA/AA, coarctation of aorta/aortic arch; CAVC, complete atrioventricular canal; LSVC, left superior vena cava; TV, tricuspid valve; TR, tricuspid regurgitation. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is shown in bold.
Figure 1Schematic research route providing the overall illustration of our study. Three surgical strategies were adopted and the specific techniques were provided. Death and reoperation cases were shown in yellow and orange squares, respectively. The numbers of patients were indicatied in brackets of each squares. ccTGA, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; PAB, Pulmonary artery band; DS, double switch; ASO, arterial switch operation; MBTS, modified Blalock-Taussig shunt.
Early outcome stratified by different surgical strategies.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bypass time (min) | 245.1 ± 84.7 | 143.6 ± 34.2 | 114.2 ± 33.8 |
|
| Aorta cross–clamp time (min) | 151.1 ± 36.8 | 79.6 ± 13.2 | 60.9 ± 23.9 |
|
| Mechanical ventilation (hours) | 196.3 ± 81.9 | 152.6 ± 52.6 | 32.5 ± 50.7 |
|
| ICU stay length (day) | 15.8 ± 6.7 | 12.6 ± 5.0 | 6.1 ± 3.3 |
|
| In–hospital stay length (day) | 25.2 ± 9.5 | 23.7 ± 5.5 | 15.9 ± 7.2 |
|
| Survival to discharge | 38 (92.7) | 11 (100) | 36 (94.7) | – |
| Early death | 3 (7.3) | – | 2 (5.6) | 0.639 |
| ECMO | 2 (4.9) | – | – | 0.295 |
| Neurologic event | 1 (2.4) | – | – | 0.546 |
| Acute renal failure | – | – | 1 (2.6) | 0.501 |
| VAD implantation | 1 (2.4) | – | 1 (2.6) | 0.866 |
| Patients with ≥1 | ||||
| Early complications | 13 (31.7) | 5 (45.5) | 9 (23.7) | 0.362 |
| Bleeding | 1 (2.4) | 1 (9.1) | – | 0.196 |
| Pulmonary infection | 1 (2.4) | – | 1 (2.6) | 0.546 |
| Low cardiac output | 3 (7.3) | 1 (9.1) | 3 (7.9) | 0.981 |
| Hypoxemia | 3 (7.3) | 2 (18.2) | 2 (5.3) | 0.367 |
| Recurrent pleural effusion | 5 (12.2) | 3 (27.3) | 4 (10.5) | 0.340 |
| RV dysfunction | – | 1 (9.1) | – |
|
| Conduit obstruction | 1 (2.4) | – | – | 0.546 |
| Diaphragmatic paralysis | 1 (2.4) | – | – | 0.546 |
| Chylothorax | – | – | 1 (2.6) | 0.501 |
| Need for early reintervention | 1 (2.4) | – | – | 0.866 |
| Need for early reoperation | 1 (2.4) | – | – | 0.546 |
ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VAD, ventricular assistance devices; RV, right ventricle. The definition of acute renal failure referred to urine output 0.3 mL/kg/h for 24 h (oliguria) or anuria for 12 h. Recurrent pleural effusion referred to refractory and persistent pleural effusion that unresponsive to diuretic treatments orally or intravenously, or the patients developed pleural effusion over 3 times in early postoperative period. The diagnosis of heart failure or low cardiac output was based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database, as described elsewhere (.
Figure 2(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of different surgical strategies for ccTGA. (B) Freedom from reoperation of different surgical strategies for ccTGA. Numbers of patients at risk are indicated in the rectangle.
Short-to mid-term complications and reinterventions associated with each patient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biventricular | 5 (13.2) | III AVB | Pacemaker implantation | 3 |
| III AVB | Pacemaker implantation | 5 | ||
| LVOTO | LVOTO resection and enlargement | 36 | ||
| LVOTO | LVOTO resection and enlargement | 24 | ||
| RVOTO | Conduit replacement | 60 | ||
| 1.5 ventricular | 3 (27.3) | RVOTO | Conduit replacement | 24 |
| SVC thrombosis | Thrombectomy | 0.75 | ||
| Diaphragmatic paralysis | Diaphragm plication | 0.5 | ||
| Univentricular | 4 (11.1) | Severe AVVR | AVV valvuloplasty | 36 |
| III AVB | Pacemaker implantation | 2 | ||
| SVC thrombosis | Thrombectomy | 7 | ||
| Conduit obstruction | Conduit replacement | 12 |
AVB, atrioventricular block; LVOTO, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; RVOTO, right ventricular outflow tract obstruction; SVC, superior vena cava; AVVR, atrioventricular valves regurgitation; AVV, atrioventricular valves.
Tricuspid regurgitation and cardiac function of the three groups comparing preoperative and last follow-up data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR | |||||||||
| None to mild | 19 | 26 |
| 3 | 10 |
| 23 | 29 |
|
| Mild to moderate | 3 | 6 | – | 1 | 4 | 2 | |||
| Moderate | 14 | 3 | 6 | – | 4 | 1 | |||
| Moderate to severe | 3 | – | – | – | 0 | – | |||
| Severe | 2 | – | 2 | – | 3 | – | |||
| LVEF% | 63.7 ± 4.32 | 65.9 ± 3.85 |
| 62.5 ± 5.07 | 65.7 ± 2.93 |
| 64.9 ± 3.77 | 64.1 ± 4.66 |
|
TR, tricuspid regurgitation; LVEF%, left ventricle ejection fraction. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is shown in bold.