Literature DB >> 23820627

Impact of age and duration of banding on left ventricular preparation before anatomic repair for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries.

Patrick O Myers1, Pedro J del Nido, Tal Geva, Victor Bautista-Hernandez, Peter Chen, John E Mayer, Sitaram M Emani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal age and duration of left ventricular (LV) training in congenitally corrected transposition (ccTGA) with an unprepared LV is unknown. The objective of this study was to review the effect of age at pulmonary artery banding (PAB) and duration of ventricular training on LV function and aortic regurgitation (AR) after anatomic repair.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent PA banding for LV training between 1998 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary end points were moderate or more LV dysfunction and moderate or more AR after anatomic repair.
RESULTS: During the study period, 25 patients with ccTGA underwent PAB for LV preparation. There was 1 early death. Eighteen patients underwent anatomic repair at a median of 10 months (range, 2 weeks to 11 years) from PAB. At the most recent follow-up after anatomic repair, moderate AR developed in 1 patient, and moderate or more LV dysfunction developed in 4. LV dysfunction developed in 4 of 6 patients banded after 2 years of age, compared with 0 of 12 patients banded before 2 years (p = 0.005). After anatomic repair, LV dysfunction developed in 4 of 7 patients repaired after age 3 years compared with 0 of 11 repaired before 3 years (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Early PAB strategy is associated with favorable LV and neoaortic valve function after anatomic repair for ccTGA with an unprepared LV. Candidates for anatomic repair who require LV training should be referred early in infancy for consideration of appropriate timing of PAB.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  20

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23820627     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Anatomic Repair of Congenitally Corrected Transposition: Reappraisal of Eligibility Criteria.

Authors:  Viktoria H M Weixler; Peter Kramer; Peter Murin; Olga Romanchenko; Mi-Young Cho; Stanislav Ovroutski; Michael Hübler; Felix Berger; Joachim Photiadis
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.838

2.  Clinical Outcomes after Anatomic Repair Including Hemi-Mustard Operation in Patients with Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries.

Authors:  Man-Shik Shim; Tae-Gook Jun; Ji-Hyuk Yang; Pyo Won Park; Yang Hyun Cho; Seok Kang; June Huh; Jin Young Song
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries: Mid-term Outcomes of Different Surgical Strategies.

Authors:  Xiaomin He; Bozhong Shi; Zhiying Song; Yanjun Pan; Kai Luo; Qi Sun; Zhongqun Zhu; Zhiwei Xu; Jinghao Zheng; Zhifang Zhang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Pattern Analysis of Left Ventricular Remodeling Using Cardiac Computed Tomography in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo; Sang Hyub Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.