| Literature DB >> 35186098 |
Jing-Qi Fan1, Zi-Qiao Xu1, Yuan-Yuan Chen1, Wei-Jing Lu1, Xiao-Yan Xie1, Yu-Ting Wang1, Li-Xing Zhuang2.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease anxiety (PDA) is a nonmotor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is often neglected. PDA poses a far-reaching challenge to the treatment of PD. Acupuncture could be successful in the treatment of PDA. However, the evidence for this is still limited. We propose a two-stage clinical trial. In stage 1, a total of 70 volunteers with PDA will be randomly assigned to either acupuncture (manual acupuncture) or control group (sham acupuncture) in a 1 : 1 ratio. Treatments will be performed for four weeks. The change in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) score from baseline to week 4 and week 12 will be the primary outcome. The levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol (CORT), serotonin (5-HT), and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRH) in the patients' serum and the scores on the Hoehn-Yahr Rating Scale and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) will all be considered among the secondary outcomes. Participants will be followed up until week 12. In stage 2, a total of 82 volunteers with PDA will be randomly assigned to either an acupuncture (manual acupuncture) or a control group (anti-Parkinson drugs only) in a 1 : 1 ratio. HAMA score will be the primary outcome. Universality, feasibility and cost effectiveness, Hoehn-Yahr Rating Scale, UPDRS, and serological indicators will be secondary outcomes. Participants will be followed up until week 4. The statistical analysis will include all the allocated individuals. The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine's Research Ethical Committee authorized this procedure, and the trial is registered with ChiCTR2100047253.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186098 PMCID: PMC8849893 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5180193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flowchart of stage 1 of the trial.
Figure 2Selection and location of the acupoints for acupuncture.
Figure 3Main structure of the sham acupuncture needle.
Figure 4Acupuncture needle base.
Figure 5Real needle and sham needle.
The timeline of participant progress through stage 1.
| Baseline visit | Intervention (weeks 1–4) | Follow-up period | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time point | Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 12 |
| Signing consent | ● | |||||
| General examination | ● | |||||
| Inclusion/exclusion | ● | |||||
| Grouping | ● | |||||
| Medication status | ● | ● | ||||
| Acupuncture/sham acupuncture | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| HAMA | ● | ● | ● | |||
| UPDRS | ● | ● | ● | |||
| Hoehn–Yahr Rating Scale | ● | ● | ● | |||
| SF-36 scale | ● | ● | ● | |||
| Serological indicators | ● | ● | ||||
| Adverse events | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||
| Safety assessment | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||
HAMA: Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.
Figure 6Flowchart of stage 2 of the trial.
Timeline of the progress of the participant in stage 2.
| Baseline visit | Intervention (weeks 1–4) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time point | Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 |
| Signing consent | ● | ||||
| General examination | ● | ||||
| Risk factor | ● | ||||
| Medication status | ● | ||||
| Safety eligibility | ● | ||||
| Allocation | ● | ||||
| Acupuncture + anti-Parkinson drugs + CMO | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| Anti-Parkinson drugs + CMO | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| Feasibility and universality | ● | ||||
| Cost effectiveness | ● | ||||
| HAMA | ● | ● | |||
| UPDRS | ● | ● | |||
| Hoehn–Yahr Rating Scale | ● | ● | |||
| SF-36 scale | ● | ● | |||
| Serological indicators | ● | ● | |||
| Adverse events | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| Safety assessment | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
CMO: clinical monitoring only; HAMA: Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.
Figure 7The relationship between PD and PDA.