| Literature DB >> 35185978 |
Xu Zeng1, Jiaxue Li1, Xinkai Lyu1, Xiao-Mei Chen1, Shunxing Guo1.
Abstract
Astragalus membranaceus var. mongolicus (AMM) is an edible and medicinal material and is commonly used in East Asia. According to the pharmacopeia of China, the dried root of AMM is medicinal. However, the aerial parts of AMM are always directly discarded after harvest. The stems and leaves are also rich in active compounds, including saponins, flavonoids, terpenoids, and polysaccharides. To rationally use resources, waste products from AMM stems and leaves are useful substrates for edible fungus cultivation. Here, oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus var. florida) was cultivated on a basal substrate supplemented with AMM stems and leaves (AMM group). The nutritional and chemical composition of the fruiting body were analyzed by metabolomics and chemometrics. Our results showed that AMM addition to the substrate affected the fresh weight, moisture, fat, protein, and element concentrations, and amino acid composition of oyster mushroom. Moreover, 2,156 metabolites were detected and annotated based on the metabolomics data, of which 680 were identified as differentially expressed metabolites. Many active phytometabolites previously identified in AMM herbs were also detected in the metabolomics of oyster mushroom from AMM group, including 46 terpenoids, 21 flavonoids, 17 alkaloids, 14 phenylpropanoids, and 3 fatty acids. In summary, our results imply that oyster mushroom cultured with AMM stems and leaves might have very high nutritional therapy health care value.Entities:
Keywords: Astragalus membranaceus var. mongolicus; Pleurotus spp.; nutrition; stems and leaves; untargeted metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35185978 PMCID: PMC8853653 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.802801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1The fruiting body of P. ostreatus var. florida used in this study. (A) Sample from control group; (B) sample from AMM group.
Nutritional value, amino acid content and elemental concentrations of P. ostreatus var. florida (mean ± SD).
| Control | AMM group | |
|
| ||
| Fresh weight (g) | 60.93 ± 13.12 | 75.33 ± 7.57 |
| Moisture (g/100 g) | 86.69 ± 2.26 | 82.27 ± 1.48 |
| Protein (g/100 g) | 16.08 ± 0.96 | 29.67 ± 3.55 |
| Fat (g/100 g) | 3.27 ± 0.35 | 2.31 ± 0.13 |
| Total saccharide (%) | 51.9 ± 3.45 | 46.41 ± 7.74 |
|
| ||
| Aspartic acid | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 1.81 ± 0.02 |
| Threonine | 0.8 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.01 |
| Serine | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.75 ± 0.04 |
| Glutamine | 2.52 ± 0.07 | 2.84 ± 0.11 |
| Proline | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.71 ± 0.01 |
| Glycine | 0.76 ± 0.01 | 0.81 ± 0.02 |
| Alanine | 1.02 ± 0.01 | 1.07 ± 0.01 |
| Valine | 0.76 ± 0.01 | 0.83 ± 0.01 |
| Methionine | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 |
| Isoleucine | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.01 |
| Leucine | 1.23 ± 0.05 | 1.26 ± 0.06 |
| Tyrosine | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.53 ± 0.06 |
| Phenylalanine | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.79 ± 0.03 |
| Lysine | 1.08 ± 0.01 | 1.11 ± 0.01 |
| Histidine | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.01 |
| Arginine | 0.93 ± 0.01 | 1.09 ± 0.01 |
| Total amino acid | 14.97 ± 0.06 | 15.7 ± 0.10 |
|
| ||
| Se | 0.2096 ± 0.0081 | 0.2654 ± 0.0056 |
| Fe | 49.96 ± 0.81 | 45.04 ± 0.75 |
| Mn | 9.54 ± 041 | 10.21 ± 0.24 |
| Zn | 72.30 ± 3.86 | 79.60 ± 2.40 |
The results are expressed on a dry weight basis from the first flush except for the fresh weight, amino acid content and moisture (* = statistically significant, p < 0.05).
FIGURE 2PAC (A), PLS-DA (B), OPLS-DA (C) score plots and OPLS-DA model permutation test (D) of metabolites for comparison between AMM and control group.
FIGURE 3Functional classification and annotation of differential metabolites identified in the comparison between AMM and control group. (A) The KEGG classification of differential metabolites; (B) KEGG pathway enrichment of differential metabolites.
FIGURE 4Classification and identification of differential phytometabolites. (A) Differential phytometabolites in our study and major phytometabolites in AMM herbs; (B) product ion mass spectra of [M + H]+ ion of astragaloside IV; and (C) chromatography peak of a representative AMM (1.31 min, astragaloside IV) and control sample.
Differential pythometabolites for comparison between AMM and control group.
| Metab_ID | Retention_Time | Apex_m/z | Mode | Adduct | VIP | Log2(Fold_Change) | Putative_Metabolite | Putative_Formula | Pubchem_ID | |
|
| ||||||||||
| metab_14941 | 0.53 | 783.11 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.91 | 3.87 | 0.03 | Astragaloside IV or III | C41H68O14 | 441905 |
| metab_7914 | 0.60 | 829.30 | neg | [M + HCOO] − | 1.25 | 3.81 | 0.00 | Astragaloside IVor III | C41H68O14 | 13943297 |
| metab_758 | 8.08 | 943.64 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.99 | 3.34 | 0.02 | Soyasaponin I | C48H78O18 | 122097 |
| metab_487 | 2.83 | 291.09 | pos | [M + H] + | 2.66 | 8.11 | 0.00 | Plumericin | C15H14O6 | 5281545 |
| metab_4742 | 4.91 | 235.17 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.38 | 3.08 | 0.01 | Confertifolin | C15H22O2 | 442187 |
| metab_5602 | 2.02 | 235.17 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.99 | 4.27 | 0.00 | Confertifolin | C15H22O2 | 442187 |
| metab_8507 | 1.82 | 301.18 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.14 | 2.57 | 0.00 | Abietic acid | C20H30O2 | 10569 |
|
| ||||||||||
| metab_2580 | 6.30 | 517.24 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.16 | 12.98 | 0.02 | Formononetin 7-O-glucoside-6″-O-malonate | C25H24O12 | 23724663 |
| metab_8081 | 1.08 | 515.20 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.07 | 4.57 | 0.02 | Formononetin 7-O-glucoside-6″-O-malonate | C25H24O12 | 23724663 |
| metab_14219 | 1.54 | 267.02 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.62 | 2.37 | 0.03 | Formononetin | C16H12O4 | 5280378 |
| metab_1163 | 0.51 | 287.06 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.07 | 1.64 | 0.02 | Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | 5280863 |
| metab_5123 | 3.24 | 449.28 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.89 | 12.32 | 0.00 | Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside | C21H20O11 | 5282102 |
| metab_8263 | 1.44 | 445.14 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.67 | 2.47 | 0.02 | Calycosin 7-O-Glucoside | C22H22O10 | 5318267 |
| metab_6222 | 0.84 | 285.14 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.70 | 3.71 | 0.03 | Glycitein | C16H12O5 | 5317750 |
| metab_6222 | 0.84 | 285.14 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.70 | 3.71 | 0.03 | Biochanin A | C16H12O5 | 5280373 |
| metab_14044 | 1.79 | 283.06 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.42 | 1.04 | 0.04 | Biochanin A | C16H12O5 | 5280373 |
| metab_9173 | 3.65 | 269.05 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.28 | 7.28 | 0.03 | Genistein | C15H10O5 | 5280961 |
|
| ||||||||||
| metab_6362 | 0.60 | 138.05 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.96 | 6.21 | 0.00 | Trigonelline | C7H7NO2 | 5570 |
| metab_1296 | 0.60 | 138.05 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.97 | 4.09 | 0.00 | Trigonelline | C7H7NO2 | 5570 |
| metab_1681 | 1.71 | 370.20 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.52 | 5.49 | 0.00 | Corydaline | C22H27NO4 | 101301 |
| metab_5698 | 1.80 | 180.14 | pos | [M + H] + | 2.46 | 14.91 | 0.00 | (−)-Salsolinol | C10H13NO2 | 91588 |
| metab_6048 | 1.19 | 352.15 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.51 | 4.52 | 0.00 | Palmatine | C21H21NO4 | 19009 |
|
| ||||||||||
| metab_7983 | 0.78 | 145.04 | neg | [M–H] − | 1.30 | 2.61 | 0.04 | Coumarin | C9H6O2 | 323 |
| metab_5690 | 1.81 | 147.05 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.88 | 1.31 | 0.01 | Coumarin | C9H6O2 | 323 |
| metab_5244 | 2.87 | 193.09 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.62 | 3.47 | 0.00 | Sinapyl alcohol | C11H14O4 | 5280507 |
| metab_2362 | 4.64 | 225.11 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.39 | 11.86 | 0.03 | Sinapic acid | C11H12O5 | 637775 |
|
| ||||||||||
| metab_6222 | 0.84 | 285.14 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.70 | 3.71 | 0.03 | Acacetin | C16H12O5 | 5280442 |
|
| ||||||||||
| metab_4395 | 6.84 | 306.24 | pos | [M + H] + | 1.09 | 11.20 | 0.03 | Capsaicin | C18H27NO3 | 1548943 |