| Literature DB >> 35185894 |
Yiyang Zhang1,2,3, Lianghe Lu1,4, Zhangping He1,3, Zhishen Xu1,3, Zhicheng Xiang1,3, Run-Cong Nie1,5, Wenping Lin1,4, Wenxu Chen1,3, Jie Zhou1,3, Yixin Yin1,3, Juanjuan Xie1,3, Youcheng Zhang1,3, Xueyi Zheng1,3, Tianchen Zhu1,3, Xiaoxia Cai1,3, Peng Li1,3, Xue Chao1,3, Mu-Yan Cai1,3.
Abstract
Background: Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biomarker of an acute inflammatory response and has been successfully used as a prognostic predictor for several malignancies. However, the clinicopathological significance of CRP levels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients being treated with PD-1 inhibitors remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein; PD-1 inhibitors; hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis; tumor response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35185894 PMCID: PMC8854259 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.808101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Baseline characteristics of HCC patients.
| Total (n = 101) | CRP > 20.9 (n = 28) | CRP ≤ 20.9 (n = 73) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.653 | |||
| ≤ 60 | 80 (79.2) | 23 (82.1) | 57 (78.1) | |
| > 60 | 21 (20.8) | 5 (17.9) | 16 (21.9) | |
|
| ||||
| Male | 82 (81.2) | 25 (89.3) | 57 (78.1) | 0.197 |
| Female | 19 (18.8) | 3 (10.7) | 16 (21.9) | |
|
| 0.361 | |||
| Yes | 91 (90.1) | 24 (85.7) | 67 (91.8) | |
| No | 10 (9.9) | 4 (14.3) | 6 (8.2) | |
|
| 0.301 | |||
| A | 90 (89.1) | 23 (82.1) | 67 (91.8) | |
| B | 11 (10.9) | 5 (17.9) | 6 (8.2) | |
|
| 0.034 | |||
| ≤ 400 | 46 (45.5) | 8 (28.6) | 38 (52.1) | |
| > 400 | 55 (54.5) | 20 (71.4) | 35 (47.9) | |
|
| 0.025 | |||
| <10 | 94 (93.1) | 23 (82.1) | 71 (97.3) | |
| >10 | 7 (6.9) | 5 (17.9) | 2 (2.7) | |
|
| 0.001 | |||
| <3 | 58 (57.4) | 8 (28.6) | 50 (68.5) | |
| ≥3 | 43 (42.6) | 20 (71.4) | 23 (31.5) | |
|
| 0.082 | |||
| 0 | 39 (38.6) | 7 (25.0) | 32 (43.8) | |
| ≥ 1 | 62 (61.4) | 21 (75.0) | 41 (56.2) | |
|
| 0.001 | |||
| ≤ 5 | 49 (48.5) | 6 (21.4) | 43 (58.9) | |
| > 5 | 52 (51.5) | 22 (78.6) | 30 (41.1) | |
|
| 0.408 | |||
| ≤ 1 | 39 (38.6) | 9 (32.1) | 30 (41.1) | |
| > 1 | 62 (61.4) | 19 (67.9) | 43 (58.9) | |
|
| 0.129 | |||
| Present | 49 (48.5) | 17 (60.7) | 32 (43.8) | |
| Absent | 52 (51.5) | 11 (39.3) | 41 (56.2) | |
|
| 0.459 | |||
| Present | 59 (58.4) | 18 (64.3) | 41 (56.2) | |
| Absent | 42 (41.6) | 10 (35.7) | 32 (43.8) | |
|
| 0.302 | |||
| A | 7 (6.9) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (5.5) | |
| B | 10 (9.9) | 1 (3.6) | 9 (12.3) | |
| C | 84 (83.2) | 24 (85.7) | 60 (82.2) | |
|
| 0.651 | |||
| Curative treatment (Surgery, Ablation) | 41 (40.6) | 7 (16.7) | 34 (22.7) | |
| Local-regional (TACE, HAIC, radiation) | 82 (81.2) | 20 (47.6) | 62 (41.3) | |
| Target therapy (Sorafenib, lenvatinib) | 69 (68.3) | 15 (35.7) | 54 (36.0) |
Variables are expressed as n (%).
AFP, α-fetoprotein; BCLC stage, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage; CRP, C-reactive protein; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HAIC, hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NLR, Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
Figure 1X-tile plots of the prognostic marker CRP levels on HCC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. X-tile plot showed the χ2 log-rank values created when the cohort was divided into two populations. The cut-point highlighted by the black/white circle (A) was demonstrated on a histogram of the entire cohort (B) and a Kaplan–Meier plot (C). CRP levels were divided at the optimal cut-point, as defined by the most significant point on the plot (≤ 20.9 mg/L and > 20.9 mg/L of HCC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, P < 0.01).
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of risk factors for progression-free survival.
| Univariate |
| Multivariate |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
|
| ||||
| ≤60 | 1.0 | |||
| >60 | 0.88 (0.45–1.75) | 0.720 | ||
|
| ||||
| Male | 1.0 | |||
| Female | 0.71 (0.39–1.28) | 0.253 | ||
|
| ||||
| Viral hepatitis | 1.0 | |||
| Other | 1.97 (0.60–6.40) | 0.262 | ||
|
| ||||
| A | 1.0 | |||
| B | 1.58 (0.74–3.34) | 0.237 | ||
|
| ||||
| 0 | 1.0 | |||
| ≥1 | 0.89 (0.52–1.52) | 0.669 | ||
|
| ||||
| ≤20.9 | 1.0 | |||
| >20.9 | 2.09 (1.20–3.65) | 0.009 | 1.83 (1.04–3.20) | 0.036 |
|
| ||||
| ≤400 | 1.0 | |||
| >400 | 3.0 (1.68–5.35) | <0.001 | 2.81 (1.57–5.04) | 0.001 |
|
| ||||
| <10 | 1.0 | |||
| >10 | 0.98 (0.30–3.13) | 0.996 | ||
|
| ||||
| <3 | 1.0 | |||
| ≥3 | 1.97 (1.16–3.33) | 0.012 | ||
|
| ||||
| ≤5 | 1.0 | |||
| >5 | 1.13 (0.67–1.90) | 0.649 | ||
|
| ||||
| Single | 1.0 | |||
| Multiple | 1.31 (0.75–2.27) | 0.342 | ||
|
| ||||
| − | 1.0 | |||
| + | 1.18 (0.70–1.98) | 0.540 | ||
|
| ||||
| − | 1.0 | |||
| + | 1.43 (0.84–2.44) | 0.184 |
AFP, α- fetoprotein; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; HR, hazard ratio; NLR, Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 2ROC curve analysis for CRP, AFP and NLR was performed to evaluate response (CR + PR) of patients to PD-1 inhibitors. CRP (AUC = 0.671, P = 0.047) and CRP + AFP (AUC = 0.698, P = 0.021) implied statistical associations with treatment response to the PD-1 inhibitors.
Figure 3Association between CRP levels and PFS in HCC patients treated with PD-1 blockade. (A) Patients in the CRP-low group had more prolonged PFS than those in the CRP-high group (log-rank test). (B) In patients of BCLC-C stage, CRP levels also significantly discriminated patients with a poor prognosis.
Figure 4Association between the CRP-AFP model and PFS in HCC patients treated with PD-1 blockade. Patients with both, either, or none of elevated serum CRP and AFP levels were classified into high-, intermediate-, or low-risk subgroups. (A) All patients were stratified into markedly different risk subgroups by CRP-AFP model. (B) In patients with BCLC-C stage, the CRP-AFP model succeeded in stratifying them into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk subgroups.
Figure 5(A) Nomogram for predicting the PFS of HCC patients with CRP and AFP. (B) The calibration curve for predicting patient PFS at 1 year.
The relationship between tumor response and occurrence of CRP-AFP model in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.
| Treatment response | CRP-AFP model | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-riskgroup (n = 38) | Intermediate-risk group (n = 43) | High-risk group (n = 20) | ||
|
| 1 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
|
| 4 (10.5) | 5 (11.6) | 1 (5.0) | |
|
| 26 (68.4) | 23 (53.5) | 6 (30.0) | |
|
| 7 (18.4) | 15 (34.9) | 13 (65.0) | |
|
| 5 (13.2) | 5 (11.6) | 1 (5.0) | 0.625 |
|
| 31 (81.6) | 28 (65.1) | 7 (35.0) | 0.002 |
Variables are expressed as number of patients (%).
AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CR, complete response; CRP, C-reactive protein; DCR, disease control rate; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.