Literature DB >> 27733196

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma prognostic determination using pre-operative serum C-reactive protein levels.

Zi-Ying Lin1,2, Zhen-Xing Liang1,2, Pei-Lin Zhuang3, Jie-Wei Chen1,2, Yun Cao1,2, Li-Xu Yan4, Jing-Ping Yun1,2, Dan Xie1,2, Mu-Yan Cai5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute inflammatory response biomarker, has been recognized as an indicator of malignant disease progression. However, the prognostic significance of CRP levels collected before tumor removal in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma requires further investigation.
METHODS: We sampled the CRP levels in 140 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent hepatectomies with regional lymphadenectomies between 2006 and 2013. A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological data was performed. We focused on the impact of serum CRP on the patients' cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival rates.
RESULTS: High levels of preoperative serum CRP were significantly associated with well-established clinicopathologic features, including gender, advanced tumor stage, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between high levels of serum CRP and adverse cancer-specific survival (P = 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001). In patients with stage I/II intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the serum CRP level was a prognostic indicator for cancer-specific survival. In patients with stage I/II or stage III/IV, the serum CRP level was a prognostic indicator for recurrence-free survival (P < 0.05). Additionally, multivariate analysis identified serum CRP level in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed a significant association of elevated pre-operative CRP levels with poor clinical outcomes for the tested patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our results indicate that the serum CRP level may represent a useful factor for patient stratification in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27733196      PMCID: PMC5059936          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2827-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively rare neoplasm acquired by humans. Recently, high incidence rates have been reported in Eastern Asia, and especially in Thailand [1]. Based on the location in the body where it develops, cholangiocarcinoma is further classified into intrahepatic, perihilar extrahepatic, or distal extrahepatic. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) originates from the second segment of the bile duct, and is the least common of the cholangiocarcinoma classifications that a person could acquire. It accounts for 8–10 % of total cholangiocarcinoma cases diagnosed [2]. Its etiology is unknown, although various risk factors, including primary sclerosing cholangitis [3], liver fluke infestation [4], hepatolithiasis [5], and hepatitis viruses [6, 7], have been identified. These risk factors all induce a chronic inflammation in the biliary epithelium and partially obstruct the bile duct [8]. These risk factors are considered to be favorable for potential cancer development [8]. IHCC is seemingly incurable, has a rapid progression, and is lethal in most cases, with the 5-years survival rate being less than 5 % for non-resectable cases [9]. Surgical resection offers only a chance to cure IHCC, but the outcomes vary widely across affected patients. Several prognostic factors have been identified for the prediction of IHCC patient survival. These factors include staging [10], para-aortic lymph node status [11], positive node to the total node ratio [12], tumor size, and the presence of multiple tumors [13]. Other novel molecular biomarkers, such as hepatoma-derived growth factor [14], SOX4 [15], loss of FBXW7 expression [16], Homer1 [17], and inactivation of Smad4 [18], seem to be associated with poor IHCC patient prognosis. Despite these critical association findings, the majority of these histological predictors only apply to assessments conducted after surgical intervention. Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify pre-treatment prognostic markers that can be used for an improved risk stratified treatment approach for patients that have not undergone surgical intervention. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute phase reactive protein, has been defined as an inflammatory biomarker produced in response to pro-inflammatory cytokine hepatocyte stimulation [19]. As a result, CRP is closely associated with the development and outcome of many diseases [19]. During the past decade, elevated serum CRP has been associated with poorer prognosis in patients with various malignant cancers, including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and urological cancer [20-25]. This linkage implies a close association between inflammation and malignancy. A recent study has also revealed that chronic inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokines, like interleukin 6 (IL-6), play an important role in the development and progression of cholangiocarcinoma [26]. Based on these conclusions, it seems as though CRP may be a promising prognostic factor that could be incorporated into prognostic models to improve the predictive accuracy of the outcomes for IHCC patients. Already, a retrospective study has shown that the serum CRP was a prognostic factor in a patient with a small size perihilar cholangiocarcinoma [27]. In published literature, the relation between serum CRP and prognosis of IHCC has not been explored yet. In this study, we aimed to explore the prognostic significance of pre-treatment serum CRP levels on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in IHCC patients.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective study included 140 IHCC patients that were treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between the years of 2006 and 2013. The patient cases were selected for inclusion in this study based on the following criteria: pathological diagnosis of IHCC, primary and curative tumor resection surgery without preoperative anticancer treatment, the availability of preoperative serum CRP levels, liver function and clinicopathological and follow-up data. The IHCC cohort included 93 (66 %) men and 47 (34 %) women with a mean age of 54.11 years. The average follow-up time after surgery was 20.9 months (median: 14.7 months; range: 0.55 to 87.9 months). Follow-up evaluations were performed every 3 months within the first year, every 6 months for the next 2 years, and annually 3 years after the surgery. The histopathological findings of this IHCC cohort were also reviewed, including tumor multiplicity, intraepithelial ductal spread and vascular invasion. Tumor differentiation was determined based on the criteria proposed in the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System (2010 version). At the T stage, the lymph node status and the tumor stage were defined according to the UICC/AJCC tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) Classification System (2010 version). Ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning were used to detect tumor recurrence, which included incidences of intrahepatic recurrence or metastasis. The time of detection was used as the time of recurrence. In our study, the RFS was defined as the time from surgery to IHCC recurrence or patient death from IHCC, whichever came first in each individual case. The CSS was the time from the date of surgery to the last follow-up visit or date of death from IHCC. The Institute Research Medical Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center approved the methods used in this study.

Detection of serum CRP

Serum CRP levels were detected by the biosensor. To be included in the study, the serum used for CRP detection needed to be collected within 5 days before the tumor resection surgery. The biosensor detection system was adjusted regularly with a calibration curve acquired from the four-parameter Logit log mode. All the reagents used in CRP detection were derived from the WHO standards.

Statistical analysis

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the preoperative serum CRP cutoff value that was acceptable for patient case inclusion in this study. The correlation between preoperative serum CRP level and the clinicopathologic features of the IHCC patients was evaluated by a χ 2 test. Using univariate analysis, survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The differences between groups when considering survival were analyzed by the log-rank test. The effect of preoperative serum CRP and other clinicopathological variables on CSS and RFS were evaluated with the Cox proportional hazards regression model. For the variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis, a further multivariate survival analysis was performed with the Cox regression model. The corresponding hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were extracted from the Cox regression models. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software package (SPSS Standard version 16.0, SPSS Inc.). A P < 0.05 in a two-sided analysis was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

All patients underwent curative resection for IHCC with the following intra-operative goals: complete tumor resection with lymphoadenectomy and leaving the cut surface free of tumor. Median tumor size was 5.5 cm (range from 0.5 to 15.0 cm). In this study, 140 IHCCs were located in right lobe (74, 53 %), left lobe (47, 34 %), both right and left lobes (17, 12 %), and quadrate lobe (2, 1 %), respectively. Most patients exhibited well-differentiated or moderately-differentiated tumors (n = 91, 65 %). Vascular invasion was observed in 54 (39 %) patients. Intraepithelial ductal spread was detected in 88 of 140 (63 %) patients with IHCC. The elevated levels of preoperative serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were observed in 53 (38 %) and 43 (31 %) patients, respectively. Cancer recurrence was observed in 87 patients, including 55 of intrahepatic relapse, 17 of multiple metastases, 12 of lymph node metastasis and 3 lung metastases. Patients received postoperative chemotherapy according to the status of lymph node metastasis and multiple tumor nodules. The characteristics and pathological features of IHCC patients are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1

Correlation of preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels with patients’ clinico-pathological features in intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma

VariableAll casesSerum CRP mg/L P valuea
≤1.8> 1.8
Age (years)0.355
  ≤ 55b 7521 (28.0 %)54 (72.0 %)
  > 557121 (32.3 %)44 (67.7 %)
Gender0.018
 Male9322 (23.7 %)71 (76.3 %)
 Female4720 (42.6 %)27 (57.4 %)
Location0.263
 Right lobe7526 (34.7 %)49 (65.3 %)
 Left lobe4613 (28.3 %)33 (71.7 %)
Both lobes or quadrate lobe193 (15.8 %)16 (84.2 %)
 ALT< 0.001
 Normal8737 (42.5 %)50 (57.5 %)
 Elevated535 (9.4 %)48 (90.6 %)
AST0.002
 Normal9737 (38.1 %)60 (61.9 %)
 Elevated435 (11.6 %)38 (88.4 %)
HbsAg0.417
 Positive5515 (27.3 %)40 (72.7 %)
 Negative8225 (30.5 %)57 (69.5 %)
CEA (ng/ml)0.047
  ≤ 510135 (34.7 %)66 (65.3 %)
  > 5387 (16.7 %)31 (81.6 %)
CA19-9 (U/ml)0.024
  ≤ 355723 (40.4 %)34 (59.6 %)
  > 358219 (23.2 %)63 (76.8 %)
Tumor size (cm)0.119
  ≤ 5.5c 7125 (35.2 %)46 (64.8 %)
  > 5.56917 (24.6 %)52 (75.4 %)
Nodal metastasis0.158
 Yes296 (20.7 %)23 (79.3 %)
 No11136 (32.4 %)75 (67.6 %)
Tumor multiplicity0.830
 Single10832 (29.6 %)76 (70.4 %)
 Multiple3210 (31.2 %)22 (68.8 %)
Intraepithelial ductal spread0.039
 Absent5221 (40.4 %)31 (59.6 %)
 Present8821 (23.9 %)67 (76.1 %)
Vascular invasion0.940
 Absent8626 (30.2 %)60 (69.8 %)
 Present5416 (29.6 %)38 (70.4 %)
Grade0.185
 I147 (50.0 %)7 (50.0 %)
 II7723 (29.9 %)31 (70.1 %)
 III4912 (24.5 %)37 (75.5 %)
TNM0.011
 I-II7830 (38.5 %)48 (61.5 %)
 III- IV6212 (19.4 %)50 (80.6 %)
Postoperative chemotherapy0.078
 Yes4710 (21.3 %)37 (78.7 %)
 No9332 (34.4 %)61 (65.6 %)

aChi-square test

bMedian age

cMedian size

CRP C-reactive protein, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HbsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis

Correlation of preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels with patients’ clinico-pathological features in intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma aChi-square test bMedian age cMedian size CRP C-reactive protein, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HbsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis

Preoperative serum CRP level cutoff selection

The mean pre-treatment plasma CRP level was 15.2 mg/L. To develop an optimal serum CRP cutoff value for further analysis, we subjected the serum CRP levels to an ROC curve analysis with respect to the survival and recurrence statuses (Fig. 1). The ROC curves showed the point on the curve closest to (0.0, 1.0), which maximizes both the sensitivity and specificity for the outcomes. Patients with cancer with CRP levels above the obtained cutoff value have a higher risk of tumor recurrence and cancer-related death than cases with levels below the value. Based on the gathered data, an optimal CRP level cutoff value of 1.8 mg/L was determined to differentiate between the opposing patient prognoses (area under the curve: 0.659; 95 % CI: 0.570–0.749) (Fig. 1a) as well as between the tumor recurrence and no further incidence of tumors (area under the curve: 0.659; 95 % CI: 0.566–0.752) (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determination of cutoff score for preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels. The sensitivity and specificity for each outcome were plotted: cancer-specific survival a, recurrence-free survival b

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determination of cutoff score for preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels. The sensitivity and specificity for each outcome were plotted: cancer-specific survival a, recurrence-free survival b

Relationship between preoperative serum CRP level and IHCC patient clinicopathological features

We separated patients into two groups according to low CRP levels (≤1.8 mg/L) or high CRP levels (>1.8 mg/L) according to the ROC curve analysis. We evaluated the associations between preoperative serum CRP levels and other clinicopathological factors gathered in the individual patient cases. An elevated serum CRP level was significantly correlated with gender, advanced tumor stage, elevated ALT, AST, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels and intraepithelial ductal spread (P < 0.05). No significant associations were found in between CRP level and age, tumor location, hepatitis B virus infection, tumor size, tumor grading, nodal metastasis, tumor multiplicity, vascular invasion and chemotherapy administration (Table 1).

Relationship between preoperative serum CRP level and IHCC patient survival

To investigate whether preoperative serum CRP level and other clinicopathological factors are associated with IHCC patient survival, we calculated univariate Cox proportional models for the CSS and RFS. Univariate analyses identified tumor size (≤5.5 vs >5.5 cm, P = 0.001), a high tumor stage (stage I/II vs III/IV, P = 0.007), nodal metastasis (absent vs presence, P = 0.011), vascular invasion (absent vs presence, P = 0.001), elevated CA19-9 (≤35 vs >35 U/ml, P = 0.016), and a high serum CRP level (≤1.8 vs >1.8 mg/L, P = 0.001) as poor prognostic factors for CSS. For a poor prognosis of RFS, having a larger tumor size (≤5.5 vs >5.5 cm, P = 0.001), a high tumor stage (stage I/II vs III/IV, P = 0.025), nodal metastasis (absent vs no presence, P = 0.016), vascular invasion (absent vs presence, P = 0.003), postoperative chemotherapy (chemotherapy vs on postoperative treatment, P < 0.001), and a high serum CRP level (≤1.8 vs >1.8 mg/L, P < 0.001) were identified as poor prognostic factors. Age, gender, tumor location, grading, elevated ALT, AST and CEA levels, and tumor multiplicity were not significantly associated with clinical outcomes for the set of patients (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariate analyses of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and clinicopathologic variables in 140 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (Cox proportional-hazards regression)

VariablesAll casesCancer-specific survivalRecurrence-free survival
Hazard Ratio (95 % CI) P valueHazard Ratio (95 % CI) P value
Age (years)
  ≤ 55a 7511
  > 55650.930 (0.572–1.513)0.7720.862 (0.562–1.321)0.496
Gender
 Male9311
 Female470.770 (0.455–1.301)0.3290.770 (0.488–1.214)0.216
Location
 Right lobe7511
 Left lobe461.329 (0.772–2.289)0.3041.224 (0.760–1.972)0.407
 Both lobes or quadrate lobe191.192 (0.855–1.662)0.3001.217 (0.900–1.646)0.202
ALT
 Normal8711
 Elevated531.295 (0.794–2.110)0.3001.218 (0.791–1.874)0.371
AST
 Normal9711
 Elevated431.305 (0.783–2.175)0.3081.149 (0.729–1.812)0.550
HbsAg
 Positive551.027 (0.629–1.675)0.9161.212 (0.785–1.871)0.385
 Negative8211
Tumor size (cm)
  ≤ 5.5b 7111
  > 5.5692.315 (1.407–3.810)0.0012.072 (1.347–3.188)0.001
Grade
 I1411
 II770.490 (0.169–1.418)0.1880.363 (0.141–0.934)0.036
 III490.910 (0.544–1.521)0.7190.794 (0.507–1.244)0.314
Nodal metastasis
 No11111
 Yes292.048 (1.169–3.589)0. 0111.847 (1.123–3.038)0. 016
Tumor multiplicity
 Single10811
 Multiple321.266 (0.729–2.198)0.4031.214 (0.742–1.985)0.440
Intraepithelial ductal spread
 Absent520.821 (0.507–1.329)0.4220.897 (0.585–1.375)0.618
 Present8811
Vascular invasion
 Absent8611
 Present542.298 (1.416–3.731)0.0011.901 (1.238–2.918)0.003
TNM
 I-II7811
 III-IV621.977 (1.203–3.249)0.0071.644 (1.065–2.536)0.025
CEA (ng/ml)
  ≤ 510111
  > 5381.276 (0.734–2.219)0.3881.317 (0.819–2.119)0.255
CA19-9 (U/ml)
  ≤ 355711
  > 35821.889 (1.125–3.169)0.0161.441 (0.930–2.234)0.102
Postoperative chemotherapy
 No9311
 Yes471.520 (0.925–2.498)0.0982.515 (1.619–3.908)<0.001
Serum CRP (mg/L)
  ≤ 1.84211
  > 1.8982.965 (1.551–5.667)0.0012.751<0.001

ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HbsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis

aMedian age

bMedian size

Univariate analyses of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and clinicopathologic variables in 140 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (Cox proportional-hazards regression) ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HbsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis aMedian age bMedian size Among the 140 IHCC patients, death occurred in 11 of 42 (26 %) patients with a low serum CRP level and in 56 of 98 (57 %) patients with a high serum CRP level (P = 0.001). In the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, there was highly significant association between a high serum CRP level and shortened patient survival time (P = 0.001, Kaplan-Meier Method) (Fig. 2a). A stratified survival analysis was also performed to evaluate the serum CRP levels in subsets of the IHCC patients that were at different clinical stages. Our results demonstrated that a high serum CRP level was a prognostic factor in IHCC patients with stage I/II cancer (P = 0.006, Kaplan-Meier Method) (Fig. 2c) but not stage III/IV cancer (P = 0.126, Kaplan-Meier Method) (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of preoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) (log-rank test). The preoperative serum CRP levels and the probability of cancer-specific survival (CSS, a) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of IHCC patients b The preoperative serum CRP levels and the probability of cancer-specific survival in IHCC patients at stage I-II c and stage III-IV d The preoperative serum CRP levels and the probability of RFS in IHCC patients at stage I-II e and stage III-IV f

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of preoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) (log-rank test). The preoperative serum CRP levels and the probability of cancer-specific survival (CSS, a) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of IHCC patients b The preoperative serum CRP levels and the probability of cancer-specific survival in IHCC patients at stage I-II c and stage III-IV d The preoperative serum CRP levels and the probability of RFS in IHCC patients at stage I-II e and stage III-IV f Results in the RFS analysis were similar to that in CSS analysis. Patients with high serum CRP level showed a significant trend toward worse RFS compared to the RFS of patients with low serum CRP levels (P < 0.001, Kaplan-Meier Method) (Fig. 2b). Additionally, a stratified survival analysis showed that a high serum CRP level was a predictor for RFS in both stage I/II cancers (P = 0.007, Kaplan-Meier Method) (Fig. 2e) and stage III/IV cancers (P = 0. 015, Kaplan-Meier Method) (Fig. 2f).

Independent prognostic value of preoperative serum CRP levels in IHCC patients

To determine the independent prognostic value of the serum CRP levels for CSS and RFS, we performed multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional hazard model. The clinicopathologic variables, specifically tumor stage, tumor size, nodal metastasis, vascular invasion, CA19-9 level, administration of postoperative chemotherapy, and serum CRP levels, were tested in the multivariate analyses. The clinicopathological variables were found to be of statistical significance in the univariate analyses. In the multivariate analyses, we found that high serum CRP level was a prognostic factor for poor CSS (P = 0.004) and RFS (P < 0.001) of IHCC patients. Additionally, it appeared that independent of tumor stage, nodal metastasis and CA19-9 level were not prognostic factors for poor CSS and RFS (Table 3). Despite this finding, tumor size and vascular invasion were found to be independent prognostic predictors for poor CSS and RFS, as well as administration of postoperative chemotherapy for poor RFS (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Cox multivariate analyses of prognostic factors on patients’ survival

VariablesHazards ratio95 % CI P value
Cancer-specific survivala
 CA19-9, U/ml (≤35 v >35)1.5530.904–2.6680.111
 Tumor size, cm (≤5.5 v >5.5)2.1431.239–3.7060.006
 Nodal metastasis (absent v present)1.3900.703–2.7490.343
 Vascular invasion (absent v present)1.9541.181–3.2330.009
 TNM (I-II v III-IV)0.8840.459–1.7020.711
 Serum CRP, mg/L (≤1.8 v >1.8)2.6461.356–5.1640.004
Recurrence- free survivalb
 Postoperative chemotherapy (yes v no)1.7881.042–3.0670.035
 Tumor size, cm (≤5.5 v >5.5)1.9201.153–3.1970.012
 Nodal metastasis (absent v present)1.2770.689–2.3670.437
 Vascular invasion (absent v present)1.7331.107–2.7150.016
 TNM (I-II v III-IV)0.6630.369–1.1910.169
 Serum CRP, mg/L (≤1.8 v >1.8)2.8271.636–4.886< 0.001

CI confidence interval, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis, CRP C-reactive protein

aThe total number of patients and total number of events in this model were 140 and 67, respectively

bThe total number of patients and total number of events in this model were 140 and 87, respectively

Cox multivariate analyses of prognostic factors on patients’ survival CI confidence interval, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis, CRP C-reactive protein aThe total number of patients and total number of events in this model were 140 and 67, respectively bThe total number of patients and total number of events in this model were 140 and 87, respectively

Discussion

CRP is an acute-phase reactant, and plays a role in microbial infection, trauma, infarction, autoimmune diseases, and malignant cancers [28]. Recently, high levels of serum CRP have been associated with metastatic disease and a poor prognosis in various malignant cancers, including perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, the role of CRP status in IHCC, and its utility to clinicians, remains unknown. In our study, we retrospectively assessed IHCC patient cases in order to explore the prognostic value of preoperative CRP. We sought to determine the relative survival rates for IHCC patients who underwent curative operations to remove cancerous tumors. Our study demonstrated that preoperative serum CRP levels were strongly associated with adverse CSS and RFS in IHCC patients. Furthermore, the preoperative serum CRP level appeared independent from tumor characteristics and treatment allocation. Other groups have reported similar results [23, 29–32], in which preoperative serum CRP level was significantly correlated with other pathologic parameters found in solid cancers, such as decreased survival times, increased loco-regional recurrence rates, more severe post-operative complications, and a shorter relapse time after surgery. A more recent study has found that C-reactive protein, at the time of diagnosis, predicts poorer outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients that are unable to have tumor removal surgeries [33]. More importantly, high CRP level was significantly correlated with poor survival and found to be independently predictive of survival in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma as evidenced by the in the univariate and multivariate analyses [27]. In summation, it appears the pre-operative CRP level may be useful prognostic predictor in many cancer patients who have undergone a radical treatment to remove the cancer. Despite this finding, the prognostic significance in IHCC patients that have not undergone tumor removal surgery still needs further study. In our study, subgroup analyses, with respect to the TNM stage, supported the prognostic relevance of serum CRP, except for the CSS rate in the subgroup of TNM stage III–IV. This finding is inconsistent with the previous studies, which imply a strengthened association between serum CRP concentration and prognosis in patients with advanced cancers, included colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, and renal cell cancer [20, 34–37]. Notably, there is also a report [38] which shows no significant prognostic value when considering serum CRP level for predicting cancer recurrence rate in stage II and III colorectal cancer. Taken together, differences in the geographic backgrounds, biological characteristics of different tumors, selection of the CRP cutoff valve, patient heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and different definitions of end points (disease-free, cancer specific survival, or overall survival) may contribute to these discrepancies. The underling mechanism regarding the elevated CRP level indicating a potential poorer outcome for cancer patients is unknown. There are three possible explanations. First, this phenomenon could be explained by causality, or that an elevated CRP level promotes tumor progression. Second, this could be explained by reverse causality, or that tumor progression increases the CRP level. Lastly, there could be a confounding explanation. A third factor, for example inflammation, could increase both CRP level and tumor malignancy. Notably, there are evidence [26] that the inflammatory field effect, reflected by elevated CRP, may be directly involved in tumor progression. This could explain the CRP level’s prognostic significance in IHCC, which has a development and progression that are closely related with inflammation [39, 40]. For example, IL-6, one of the main inducers of CRP production, has been shown to be associated with development and progression of cholangiocarcinoma and other cancers [28, 41]. Moreover, CRP was shown to directly enhance tumor cell proliferation under stressed conditions in a recent study on myeloma [42]. Clearly, the causal mechanisms of CRP regarding the progression of IHCC and other cancers need to be clarified in further investigations. The findings presented in this report may have impacts for the design of future clinical trials. Most studies in advanced IHCC only stratify prognoses according to variables like tumor staging and grading, presence or absence of vascular invasion/extra-hepatic spread, and CEA or CA19-9 levels. The strong and independent prognostic significance of serum CRP levels found in this study provides evidence to collect serum CRP levels in future clinical trials for the potential determination of an IHCC patient’s prognosis. There are a few limitations in the design of this study. CRP is known to be a non-specific marker of inflammation. It is possible that an undocumented super infection could influence CRP concentrations in the serum. Furthermore, as IHCC is mainly located within the liver, the synthetic function of the hepatocytes may be affected. This change in functioning may act as a confounding factor that correlates directly with both the development of IHCC and the serum concentration of CRP. Moreover, our study is limited by its retrospective nature and a rather heterogeneous group of patients. Based on the results of our study, it is possible that a higher preoperative CRP level in IHCC patients was associated with a higher risk for recurrence and earlier death because of the disease. Whether patients can be selected for resection, or increase the chances of curative resection, can only be evaluated in a controlled prospective clinical trial. However, to the best of our knowledge, our study represents the first one validates the prognostic value of serum CRP levels in IHCC patient prognoses.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the preoperative CRP level was a strong and independent predictor of a poor prognostic outcome, as indicated by the univariate and multivariate analyses. Adding the serum CRP into TNM stage factor could improve the ability to discriminate between IHCC patients’ outcomes. Our data seem to indicate that CRP could function as an independent prognostic factor of outcomes in IHCC. Additionally, the data support the consideration of the preoperative CRP level for therapy stratification. The causal role of CRP in tumor progression merits further investigation in preclinical studies.
  42 in total

1.  Loss of FBXW7 expression is associated with poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chinbold Enkhbold; Tohru Utsunomiya; Yuji Morine; Satoru Imura; Tetsuya Ikemoto; Yusuke Arakawa; Mami Kanamoto; Shuichi Iwahashi; Yu Saito; Daichi Ishikawa; Mitsuo Shimada
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.288

2.  Identification of Homer1 as a potential prognostic marker for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  San-Yun Wu; Ming-Xia Yu; Xiao-Gai Li; Shu-Fang Xu; Ji Shen; Zhen Sun; Xin Zhou; Xing-Zhen Chen; Jian-Cheng Tu
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

3.  Occult hepatitis B virus infection in Chinese cryptogenic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patient population.

Authors:  YuQiong Li; Hui Wang; DaPeng Li; JingYi Hu; Hao Wang; DongXun Zhou; QiaoMei Li; XiaoLan Jiang; HuaBang Zhou; HePing Hu
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 4.  Update on inflammatory bowel disease in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Authors:  Christos Tsaitas; Anysia Semertzidou; Emmanouil Sinakos
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-04-27

Review 5.  Targeting interleukin-6 in inflammatory autoimmune diseases and cancers.

Authors:  Xin Yao; Jiaqi Huang; Haihong Zhong; Nan Shen; Raffaella Faggioni; Michael Fung; Yihong Yao
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 6.  Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma: an update focusing on risk factors.

Authors:  Hai-Rim Shin; Jin-Kyoung Oh; Eric Masuyer; Maria-Paula Curado; Veronique Bouvard; Yue-Yi Fang; Surapon Wiangnon; Banchob Sripa; Sung-Tae Hong
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Elevated C-reactive protein is associated with the tumor depth of invasion but not with disease recurrence in stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takaaki Fujii; Reina Yajima; Yuichi Tabe; Satoru Yamaguchi; Soichi Tsutsumi; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2013-09

8.  Staging, prognostic factors and adjuvant therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection.

Authors:  Tao Li; Lun-Xiu Qin; Jian Zhou; Hui-Chuan Sun; Shuang-Jian Qiu; Qing-Hai Ye; Lu Wang; Zhao-You Tang; Jia Fan
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.828

Review 9.  Chronic inflammation and cytokines in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Glauben Landskron; Marjorie De la Fuente; Peti Thuwajit; Chanitra Thuwajit; Marcela A Hermoso
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.818

10.  Elevated C-reactive protein values predict nodal metastasis in patients with penile cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Al Ghazal; Sandra Steffens; Julie Steinestel; Rieke Lehmann; Thomas J Schnoeller; Anna Schulte-Hostede; Gerd Wegener; Florian Jentzmik; Mark Schrader; Markus A Kuczyk; Andres J Schrader
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  11 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for patients with mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case series of 68 patients.

Authors:  Jian Feng; Bin Liang; Hang-Yu Zhang; Zhe Liu; Kai Jiang; Xiang-Qian Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Overexpression of periostin and distinct mesothelin forms predict malignant progression in a rat cholangiocarcinoma model.

Authors:  Miguel Á Manzanares; Deanna J W Campbell; Gabrielle T Maldonado; Alphonse E Sirica
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2017-12-18

3.  CEA but not CA19-9 is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sven H Loosen; Christoph Roderburg; Katja L Kauertz; Alexander Koch; Mihael Vucur; Anne T Schneider; Marcel Binnebösel; Tom F Ulmer; Georg Lurje; Wenzel Schoening; Frank Tacke; Christian Trautwein; Thomas Longerich; Cornelis H Dejong; Ulf P Neumann; Tom Luedde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparative performance of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients operated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jiajia Lin; Tingting Fang; Mengxuan Zhu; Xin Xu; Juan Zhang; Susu Zheng; Chuyu Jing; Meixia Zhang; Binbin Liu; Boheng Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  The prognostic impact of lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein score in patients undergoing surgical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A comparative study of major representative inflammatory / immunonutritional markers.

Authors:  Daisuke Noguchi; Naohisa Kuriyama; Yuki Nakagawa; Koki Maeda; Toru Shinkai; Kazuyuki Gyoten; Aoi Hayasaki; Takehiro Fujii; Yusuke Iizawa; Akihiro Tanemura; Yasuhiro Murata; Masashi Kishiwada; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Shugo Mizuno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  High tumor mutation burden indicates a poor prognosis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Song; Xue-Zhi Liu; Qian Chen; Yan-Feng Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  C-Reactive Protein Levels Predict Responses to PD-1 Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Yiyang Zhang; Lianghe Lu; Zhangping He; Zhishen Xu; Zhicheng Xiang; Run-Cong Nie; Wenping Lin; Wenxu Chen; Jie Zhou; Yixin Yin; Juanjuan Xie; Youcheng Zhang; Xueyi Zheng; Tianchen Zhu; Xiaoxia Cai; Peng Li; Xue Chao; Mu-Yan Cai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  A New Preoperative Prognostic System Combining CRP and CA199 For Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bo-Hao Zheng; Liu-Xiao Yang; Qi-Man Sun; Hong-Kai Fan; Men Duan; Jie-Yi Shi; Xiao-Ying Wang; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Zheng-Yao Ma; Qiang Gao
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Impact of the Preoperative C-reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio on the Long-Term Outcomes of Hepatic Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tokuji Ito; Hiroji Shinkawa; Shigekazu Takemura; Shogo Tanaka; Takayoshi Nishioka; Toru Miyazaki; Atsushi Ishihara; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-08-01

10.  Therapeutic Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Data Mining Analysis.

Authors:  Tomotake Shirono; Takashi Niizeki; Hideki Iwamoto; Shigeo Shimose; Hiroyuki Suzuki; Takumi Kawaguchi; Naoki Kamachi; Yu Noda; Shusuke Okamura; Masahito Nakano; Ryoko Kuromatu; Hironori Koga; Takuji Torimura
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.