| Literature DB >> 35185564 |
Wei Mu1,2, Xiaolu Long1,2, Haodong Cai1,2, Caixia Chen1,2, Guang Hu3, Yaoyao Lou4, Shugang Xing1,2, Di Wang1,2, Jue Wang1,2, Min Xiao1,2, Kun Wang5, Zhongyi Sun5, Chunrui Li1,2, Jianfeng Zhou1,2, Liting Chen1,2.
Abstract
Different from canonical drugs, CAR T-cells are "living drugs", which derived from patient's own blood. Studies of the pharmacokinetics of CAR T-cells could improve our understanding of their efficacy, safety, optimal dosage, and other characterizes. We previously reported a phase I study of a novel fully human BCMA-targeting CAR (CT103A) in 18 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. CT103A exhibited extraordinary persistence with low anti-drug antibody positivity. To figure out the pharmacokinetic characterizes and investigate the potential reason of CT103A's long-term persistence, we established a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of CT103A based on 18 patients cohort by applying nonlinear mixed-effects modeling and analyzed the CAR T-cell clonal evolution. The results suggested that extramedullary spreading was found to impair Cmax and was therefore added as a covariate to the modified model. The model revealed tocilizumab and corticosteroids showed no impact on the CT103A expansion rate. No dominant clone existed in patients with persistently high peripheral CT103A by CAR integration sites analysis. Finally, patients with lower contraction rate constants and higher Cmax as well as memory CT103A fraction could achieve better clinical responses. Taken together, this study developed a PopPK model of a fully human anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy, and summarized its model characteristics. We suggested that the long-term persistence of CT103A was attributed to the memory CAR T-cell fraction but not the clonal evolution. This study will improve people's understanding of pharmacokinetics and PopPK of CAR T-cell immunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T cells; immunotharapy; modeling; populational pharmacokinetics; sustainability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35185564 PMCID: PMC8847740 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.803693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Patient and disease characteristics at baseline.
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Mean | 54 |
| Median | 53.5 |
| Range | 38–66 |
|
| |
| Younger than 60 y | 11 (61.1%) |
| At least 60 y | 7 (38.9%) |
|
| |
| Male | 10 (55.6%) |
| Female | 8 (44.4%) |
|
| |
| Han | 18 (100%) |
|
| |
| 1.0*10^6 cells/kg | 9 (50.0%) |
| 3.0*10^6 cells/kg | 6 (33.3%) |
| 6.0*10^6 cells/kg | 3 (16.7%) |
|
| |
| 3 | 4 (22.2%) |
| 4 | 9 (50.0%) |
| 5 | 4 (22.2%) |
| 6 | 1 (5.6%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 6 (33.3%) |
| No | 12 (66.7%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 4 (22.2%) |
| No | 14 (77.8%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 5 (27.8%) |
| No | 13 (72.2%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 11 (61.1%) |
| No | 7 (38.9%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 12 (66.7%) |
| No | 6 (33.3%) |
FIGURE 1Model-based pharmacokinetic analysis of CT103A. (A) Pharmacokinetics of peripheral transgene by 1 year clinical response in the CT103A clinical study. (B) Visual predictive checks of the base model (left) and modified model (right) simulation compared with the observed data. Hollow circles represent observed values, the solid lines and the dashed lines represent the median and the 95% CI of observation, respectively. The middle red shadow areas represent the 90% confidence intervals of median for the results of 1,000 times simulation and the blue shadow areas represent the 90% confidence intervals of the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the results of 1,000 times simulation. (C) Impacts of extramedullary spreading and prior therapies (prior other CAR T-cell therapy and auto-HSCT) on Bayesian post hoc random effects estimates. EMM, extramedullary multiple myeloma. (D) Impacts of extramedullary spreading and prior therapies (prior other CAR T-cell therapy and auto-HSCT) on AUC0-28. (E) Individual fit plots for CT103A transgene copy number over time. (F) Probabilities of responses versus doses at day 14 and day 90 after infusion were plotted. Probabilities at day 14 were fitted to a logistic regression with standard error bars showed. Blue hollow circles represent observed data; Red lines represent estimated data. (G) One-year clinical responses with/without steroids (left) and with/without tocilizumab (right).
Modified model PK parameters.
| Type | Parameter | Units | Estimate | RSE (%) | Eta shrinkage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effect | foldx | — | 5,460 | 0.8077 | — |
| Fixed effect | fb | — | 0.1172 | 0.1014 | — |
| Fixed effect | Alpha | 1/day | 0.1093 | 0.3528 | — |
| Fixed effect | Beta | 1/day | 0.006122 | 0.08901 | — |
| Fixed effect | Cmax | Copy/ug | 67,060 | 17.94 | — |
| Fixed effect | Tmax | Days | 8.657 | 0.1016 | — |
| Cmax covariate effect | Extramedullary spreading | — | 0.468 | 17.94 | — |
| Random effect | foldx | — | 215.6 | 94.42 | 1.00E-10 |
| Random effect | fb | — | 154 | 64.87 | 9.572 |
| Random effect | Alpha | — | 73.49 | 5.49 | 23.69 |
| Random effect | Beta | — | 107.3 | 79.09 | 23.61 |
| Random effect | Cmax | — | 59.49 | 1.585 | 2.192 |
| Random effect | Tmax | — | 29.01 | 1.59 | 1.00E-10 |
| Residual error | Sigma proportional | — | 47.01 | 0.8616 | — |
| Residual error | Sigma additive | — | 0.319 | 0.07648 | — |
Cmax, maximal peripheral CT103A transgene copy number; Tmax, time to maximal expansion; fb, the fraction of persistent CT103A (with contraction rate β) at peak expansion (Tmax); foldx, fold expansion from baseline; RSE, relative standard error of the parameter; Eta shrinkage, shrinkage of empirical Bayes estimates of the parameter, Eta shrinkage for each parameter is calculated by the formula (1−var(η))/ω 2.
FIGURE 2Diagnostics for modified m41odel. (A) Individual predicted concentration versus observed concentration (left). Population predicted concentration versus observed concentration (right). The red lines represent regression lines. (B) Conditional weighted residuals versus time (left) and population predicted concentration (right). The red lines and blue dash lines represent the position where conditional weighted residual equal 0 and ± 4, respectively.
FIGURE 3Clonal diversity and effector/memory fraction analysis in patients with long-lasting high level peripheral CT103A. (A) The clonal integration sites distributions analysis in patients with consistently high CT103A transgene copy number (>2000 copy/μg DNA) for at least 9 months after infusion. Cyan, indicates collection of low abundant (<3% proportional abundance) clones while red, orange and green indicate the first, second and third major clones in each sample (≥3% proportional abundance) respectively. (B) Diversity dynamics of CAR T-cells in recipients with consistently high peripheral transgene copy number. The x axis shows the time points sampled; the y axis shows the diversity of each clone measured by Simpson’s reciprocal index of diversity. (C) Observed CT103A kinetics and predicted kinetics of effector and memory CT103A. Black squares, observed data; green dash lines, model predicted data; red lines, effector CT103A; blue lines, memory CT103A.