Literature DB >> 3518529

Immunotherapy with yellow jacket venom. A comparative study including three different extracts, one adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide and two unmodified.

H Mosbech, H J Malling, I Biering, H Böwadt, M Søborg, B Weeke, H Løwenstein.   

Abstract

Thirty-two patients with previous systemic allergic reaction to yellow jacket stings were randomly allocated to three groups receiving immunotherapy with different preparations of yellow jacket venom: 1) extract adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide (Alutard-SQ), 2) Pharmalgen extract or 3) non-adsorbed extract from Allergologisk Laboratorium (ALK aq.). Regular examinations showed a decrease in skin prick test size in nearly all patients. Specific IgE-antibody (RAST and CRIE scores) showed a similar, but not significant tendency to decrease in all three groups. Specific IgG-antibody increased considerably in the Alutard group only; after 2 years, however, no difference could be detected between the three groups. During dose increase, patients treated with ALK aq. generally had smaller local reactions to injections than those treated with Pharmalgen. Few systemic reactions occurred in all three groups. Nineteen patients treated for 2 1/2-3 1/2 years were challenged in-hospital with stings from yellow jackets. No systemic and only minor local reactions occurred. Consequently, with the dose regimens applied all three extracts seem effective even though no common changes in either specific IgE or IgG could be demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3518529     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1986.tb00284.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  8 in total

Review 1.  Does allergen immunotherapy alter the natural course of allergic disorders?

Authors:  X Yang
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Clinical immunology review series: an approach to desensitization.

Authors:  M T Krishna; A P Huissoon
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  [Sting challenge: indications and execution].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Honeybee venom immunotherapy: a comparative study using purified and nonpurified aqueous extracts in patients with normal Basal serum tryptase concentrations.

Authors:  M Beatrice Bilò; Barbara Cinti; M Feliciana Brianzoni; M Chiara Braschi; Martina Bonifazi; Leonardo Antonicelli
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2012-01-12

Review 5.  Venom immunotherapy for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings.

Authors:  Robert J Boyle; Mariam Elremeli; Juliet Hockenhull; Mary Gemma Cherry; Max K Bulsara; Michael Daniels; J N G Oude Elberink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 6.  [Venom immunotherapy. Side effects and efficacy of treatment].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.198

7.  Specific immunotherapy in Albanian patients with anaphylaxis to hymenoptera venoms.

Authors:  Ervin Mingomataj; Alfred Priftanji; Etleva Qirko; Q Thai Dinh; Axel Fischer; Christian Peiser; David A Groneberg
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2002-08-30

Review 8.  Wasp Venom Biochemical Components and Their Potential in Biological Applications and Nanotechnological Interventions.

Authors:  Aida Abd El-Wahed; Nermeen Yosri; Hanem H Sakr; Ming Du; Ahmed F M Algethami; Chao Zhao; Ahmed H Abdelazeem; Haroon Elrasheid Tahir; Saad H D Masry; Mohamed M Abdel-Daim; Syed Ghulam Musharraf; Islam El-Garawani; Guoyin Kai; Yahya Al Naggar; Shaden A M Khalifa; Hesham R El-Seedi
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.546

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.