Literature DB >> 18264687

[Venom immunotherapy. Side effects and efficacy of treatment].

F Ruëff1, B Przybilla.   

Abstract

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) protects patients with Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis from subsequent potentially life-threatening reactions. The most important side effect are systemic anaphylactic reactions (SAR). Compared to the administration of aqueous extracts according to a rush protocol, the frequency of systemic and also local side effects will be lower if depot extracts are used and a slow conventional dose schedule is used, as compared to rush desensitization with aqueous extracts. However, protection often has to be achieved rapidly, and adequate surveillance of sufficient duration is hardly feasible in outpatients. Therefore, VIT according to rush schedules in inpatients remains indispensable. Pre-treatment with H(1)-blocking antihistamines reduces frequency and intensity of local and mild systemic adverse reactions during VIT. Up to 25% of patients again develop a SAR when re-stung while on VIT with the usual maintenance dose of 100 microg venom. Patients with honeybee venom allergy or with mastocytosis are at a higher risk for treatment failure. Almost all of them will become fully protected by increasing the maintenance dose, 200 microg venom being sufficient in most cases. Patients with significant risk factors may be treated from the beginning with an elevated maintenance dose, particularly when they are allergic to honeybee venom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264687     DOI: 10.1007/s00105-008-1470-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   1.198


  40 in total

1.  In-hospital sting challenge in insect venom-allergic patients after stopping venom immunotherapy.

Authors:  L Haugaard; O F Nørregaard; R Dahl
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Fatal anaphylaxis after a yellow jacket sting, despite venom immunotherapy, in two patients with mastocytosis.

Authors:  J N Oude Elberink; J G de Monchy; J W Kors; J J van Doormaal; A E Dubois
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Systemic reactions to immunotherapy: influence of composition and manufacturer.

Authors:  G Gastaminza; J Algorta; M Audicana; M Etxenagusia; E Fernández; D Muñoz
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.018

4.  Patients still reacting to a sting challenge while receiving conventional Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy are protected by increased venom doses.

Authors:  F Ruëff; A Wenderoth; B Przybilla
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Discontinuation of yellow jacket venom immunotherapy: follow-up of 75 patients by means of deliberate sting challenge.

Authors:  H K van Halteren; P W van der Linden; J A Burgers; A K Bartelink
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Efficacy of antihistamine pretreatment in the prevention of adverse reactions to Hymenoptera immunotherapy: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  K Brockow; M Kiehn; C Riethmüller; D Vieluf; J Berger; J Ring
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Hymenoptera ultra-rush venom immunotherapy (210 min): a safety study and risk factors.

Authors:  J Birnbaum; M Ramadour; A Magnan; D Vervloet
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.018

8.  Specific ultrarush desensitization in Hymenoptera venom-allergic patients.

Authors:  Domenico Schiavino; Eleonora Nucera; Emanuela Pollastrini; Tiziana De Pasquale; Alessandro Buonomo; Francesco Bartolozzi; Carla Lombardo; Chiara Roncallo; Giampiero Patriarca
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.347

9.  Increased frequency of large local reactions among systemic reactors during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sitesh R Roy; Justin R Sigmon; Jake Olivier; John E Moffitt; David A Brown; Gailen D Marshall
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.347

10.  Elevated basal serum tryptase and hymenoptera venom allergy: relation to severity of sting reactions and to safety and efficacy of venom immunotherapy.

Authors:  G Haeberli; M Brönnimann; T Hunziker; U Müller
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.018

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bee venom inhibits growth of human cervical tumors in mice.

Authors:  Hye Lim Lee; Sang Ho Park; Tae Myoung Kim; Yu Yeon Jung; Mi Hee Park; Sang Hyun Oh; Hye Seok Yun; Hyung Ok Jun; Hwan Soo Yoo; Sang-Bae Han; Ung Soo Lee; Joo Hee Yoon; Min Jong Song; Jin Tae Hong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-30

2.  Anaphylactic reactions in the build-up phase of rush immunotherapy for bee venom allergy in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Antonia Glaeser; Christoph Müller; Sebastian Bode
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2022-04-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.