Literature DB >> 35184736

Comparative assessment of methods for short-term forecasts of COVID-19 hospital admissions in England at the local level.

Sophie Meakin1, Sam Abbott2, Nikos Bosse2, James Munday2, Hugo Gruson2, Joel Hellewell2, Katharine Sherratt2, Sebastian Funk2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forecasting healthcare demand is essential in epidemic settings, both to inform situational awareness and facilitate resource planning. Ideally, forecasts should be robust across time and locations. During the COVID-19 pandemic in England, it is an ongoing concern that demand for hospital care for COVID-19 patients in England will exceed available resources.
METHODS: We made weekly forecasts of daily COVID-19 hospital admissions for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England between August 2020 and April 2021 using three disease-agnostic forecasting models: a mean ensemble of autoregressive time series models, a linear regression model with 7-day-lagged local cases as a predictor, and a scaled convolution of local cases and a delay distribution. We compared their point and probabilistic accuracy to a mean-ensemble of them all and to a simple baseline model of no change from the last day of admissions. We measured predictive performance using the weighted interval score (WIS) and considered how this changed in different scenarios (the length of the predictive horizon, the date on which the forecast was made, and by location), as well as how much admissions forecasts improved when future cases were known.
RESULTS: All models outperformed the baseline in the majority of scenarios. Forecasting accuracy varied by forecast date and location, depending on the trajectory of the outbreak, and all individual models had instances where they were the top- or bottom-ranked model. Forecasts produced by the mean-ensemble were both the most accurate and most consistently accurate forecasts amongst all the models considered. Forecasting accuracy was improved when using future observed, rather than forecast, cases, especially at longer forecast horizons.
CONCLUSIONS: Assuming no change in current admissions is rarely better than including at least a trend. Using confirmed COVID-19 cases as a predictor can improve admissions forecasts in some scenarios, but this is variable and depends on the ability to make consistently good case forecasts. However, ensemble forecasts can make forecasts that make consistently more accurate forecasts across time and locations. Given minimal requirements on data and computation, our admissions forecasting ensemble could be used to anticipate healthcare needs in future epidemic or pandemic settings.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Ensemble; Forecasting; Healthcare demand; Infectious disease; Outbreak; Real-time

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35184736      PMCID: PMC8858706          DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02271-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med        ISSN: 1741-7015            Impact factor:   8.775


  26 in total

1.  The RAPIDD ebola forecasting challenge: Synthesis and lessons learnt.

Authors:  Cécile Viboud; Kaiyuan Sun; Robert Gaffey; Marco Ajelli; Laura Fumanelli; Stefano Merler; Qian Zhang; Gerardo Chowell; Lone Simonsen; Alessandro Vespignani
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Growing backlog of planned surgery due to covid-19.

Authors:  Andrew Carr; James A Smith; Jenny Camaradou; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-02-09

3.  Prediction of infectious disease epidemics via weighted density ensembles.

Authors:  Evan L Ray; Nicholas G Reich
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis.

Authors:  Robert Verity; Lucy C Okell; Ilaria Dorigatti; Peter Winskill; Charles Whittaker; Natsuko Imai; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Hayley Thompson; Patrick G T Walker; Han Fu; Amy Dighe; Jamie T Griffin; Marc Baguelin; Sangeeta Bhatia; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Anne Cori; Zulma Cucunubá; Rich FitzJohn; Katy Gaythorpe; Will Green; Arran Hamlet; Wes Hinsley; Daniel Laydon; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Steven Riley; Sabine van Elsland; Erik Volz; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Neil M Ferguson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments.

Authors:  Michaela A C Vollmer; Ben Glampson; Thomas Mellan; Swapnil Mishra; Luca Mercuri; Ceire Costello; Robert Klaber; Graham Cooke; Seth Flaxman; Samir Bhatt
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-18

6.  Evaluating epidemic forecasts in an interval format.

Authors:  Johannes Bracher; Evan L Ray; Tilmann Gneiting; Nicholas G Reich
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.779

7.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.

Authors:  Stephen A Lauer; Kyra H Grantz; Qifang Bi; Forrest K Jones; Qulu Zheng; Hannah R Meredith; Andrew S Azman; Nicholas G Reich; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Accuracy of real-time multi-model ensemble forecasts for seasonal influenza in the U.S.

Authors:  Nicholas G Reich; Craig J McGowan; Teresa K Yamana; Abhinav Tushar; Evan L Ray; Dave Osthus; Sasikiran Kandula; Logan C Brooks; Willow Crawford-Crudell; Graham Casey Gibson; Evan Moore; Rebecca Silva; Matthew Biggerstaff; Michael A Johansson; Roni Rosenfeld; Jeffrey Shaman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Time between Symptom Onset, Hospitalisation and Recovery or Death: Statistical Analysis of Belgian COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Christel Faes; Steven Abrams; Dominique Van Beckhoven; Geert Meyfroidt; Erika Vlieghe; Niel Hens
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.