| Literature DB >> 35181973 |
Mehwish Nisar1, Asaduzzaman Khan1, Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander2,3,4.
Abstract
The health behaviours related to chronic diseases experienced by South Asian immigrants are interrelated with their culture and socioeconomic conditions. South Asian immigrants experience a disproportionate burden of chronic disease compared with non-immigrants Australian-born general population. The primary aim of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of health behaviours and healthcare access in the South Asian immigrant population of Australia. Five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with South Asian immigrants (n = 29; 18 females) aged 27-50 years in Brisbane, Australia. Separate FGDs were conducted for males and females in the English language. Semi-structured guided questions related to the perception, barriers and facilitators of health behaviours. Data were analysed with Nvivo-12 following a thematic analysis. A conceptual model is proposed to provide a summarised understanding of barriers and facilitators of health behaviours in South Asian immigrants. The major reported constraints for participating in physical activity were cultural beliefs, lack of time, work stress and high fees of fitness activities, while parks and peer modelling were mentioned as a strong motivator for walking, cycling and participating in group sports activities. The cultural and religious connections, cost of cigarettes and drink driving penalties were the most mentioned facilitators for a healthy lifestyle. The important factors related to unhealthy eating habits were the traditional cooking methods, social interactions and the high cost of fruits and vegetables. Community perceptions and language barriers were also acknowledged as the main factors for the decrease in accessing health care services. This study illustrates that cultural beliefs, high cost of healthy food and facilities and social circumstances are mainly linked with the health behaviours and healthcare access in South Asian immigrant's lifestyles.Entities:
Keywords: Australia; South Asians; health behaviours; healthcare access; immigrants
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35181973 PMCID: PMC9543603 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Soc Care Community ISSN: 0966-0410
Strategies to assess methodological rigours (Forero et al., 2018; Lincoln & Guba, 1986)
| Rigour Criteria | Purpose | Strategies applied in our study to achieve rigour |
|---|---|---|
| Credibility | To establish confidence that the results (from the perspective of the participants) are true, credible and believable. | Moderator spent an average of 2 h before the start of FGDs to engage with participants. |
| Guided questions tested at two induction meetings and using 1– pilot FGD. | ||
|
Moderator received the required knowledge and research skills to perform the roles. One observer was also collected data in all FGDs. | ||
| Moderator and observer send all the field notes to the research team for analysis and storage. | ||
| Regular debriefing sessions with key members of the research team were conducted. | ||
| Dependability | To ensure the findings of this qualitative inquiry are repeatable if the inquiry occurred within the same cohort of participants, coders and context. | A detailed draft of the study protocol was prepared throughout the study. |
| A detailed track record of the data collection process was developed. | ||
| Coding accuracy and inter‐coders’ reliability of the research team was measured by the supervisors. | ||
| Confirmability | To extend the confidence that the results would be confirmed or corroborated by other researchers. | Reflexive journals and weekly investigators meetings were implemented. |
| Several triangulation techniques were applied (e.g.: methodological, data source, investigators and theoretical). | ||
| Transferability | To extend the degree to which the results can be generalised or transferred to other contexts or settings. | A combination of different purposive sampling techniques was used. |
| Operational and theoretical data saturation was quantified. |
Demographic and professional characteristics of the focus group participants (n = 29)
| Characteristics | Number of participants | % of total participants |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 11 | 38 |
| Females | 18 | 62 |
| Age in years | ||
| 18–30 | 6 | 21 |
| 31–50 | 23 | 79 |
| Duration of stay in Australia | ||
| ≤5 years | 14 | 49 |
| >5 years | 15 | 51 |
| Employment status | ||
| Full‐time | 20 | 69 |
| Part‐time | 6 | 21 |
| Housewives | 2 | 6 |
| Highest educational qualification | ||
| Certificate | 4 | 34 |
| Bachelor/diploma | 15 | 52 |
| Postgraduate degree | 10 | 10 |
The themes and sub‐themes identified in the qualitative analysis of focus group discussions
| Main theme | Sub‐theme | Category | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrier | Facilitator | ||
| Physical activity |
Cost Culture Circumstances
Lack of time to participate in physical activity Lack of knowledge to perform physical activity Lack of dedication to participate in physical activity Lack of social network to participate in physical activity Racist bullying discourages physical activity Physical environment facilities greater physical activity Peer attitude facilities greater physical activity |
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ |
✓ ✓ |
|
Healthy diet |
Cost Culture Circumstances
Family choices facilitate/impede healthy eating Different taste of fruits and vegetables impede their intake Peer attitudes facilitate healthy eating |
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ |
✓ ✓ |
|
Smoking |
Cost Culture Circumstances
Social pressure facilitate/impede smoking Stress facilitates smoking |
✓ ✓ ✓ |
✓ ✓ |
| Alcohol |
Cost Culture Circumstances
Easy accessibility to buy alcohol Religion restrictions on alcohol intake Social pressure facilities alcohol intake Stress facilities alcohol intake Driving Laws restrict alcohol intake |
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ |
✓ ✓ ✓ |
| Healthcare access |
Cost Culture Circumstances
Self‐medications Use of traditional home remedies Ethnic background of the healthcare provider Peer review Spoken Language |
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ |
✓ ✓ ✓ |
FIGURE 13‐C FRAMEWORK linking health behaviours in South Asian Immigrants