Literature DB >> 35181518

Validation of an indirect linkage algorithm to combine registry data with Medicare claims.

Jialin Mao1, Kayla O Moore2, Jesse A Columbo3, Kunal S Mehta3, Philip P Goodney3, Art Sedrakyan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The linkage of registries to Medicare claims data can help extend follow-up for patients receiving medical devices. In the present study, we tested and validated an algorithm that does not require patient identifiers to link data from a national vascular registry and Medicare claims data.
METHODS: We used data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), a registry capturing data from >600 centers for several different vascular procedures, and Medicare claims from 2003 to 2018. We restricted the study to patients aged ≥65 years who had fee-for-service entitlement at their procedure. We performed an indirect linkage to combine the VQI and Medicare data at the patient level using a sequential algorithm based on the patient's date of birth, sex, zip code, procedure date, and procedure facility. We compared the indirectly linked cohort against a reference standard of a cohort directly linked using Social Security numbers. We calculated the matching rate and accuracy overall and before and after October 2015 when the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) system was adopted in the United States.
RESULTS: A total of 144,045 VQI-Medicare-linked patients were in the reference standard cohort. Using the indirect linking algorithm, we matched 133,966 of the 144,045 VQI patients to their Medicare claims with a matching rate of 93.0%. Of the 133,966 patients, 133,104 were correctly matched (matching accuracy, 99.4%). The matching rate was higher when the indirect linkage was implemented using the ICD-10 coded data than using the ICD-9 coded data (94.0% vs 92.2%). The accuracy of the indirect linkage remained high for all procedure modules after the ICD-10 coding change (overall, 99.4%; range, 99.0%-99.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we successfully used indirect identifiers to link the VQI data to Medicare claims with >90% success and >99% accuracy. When direct linkage of the registry claims data using Social Security numbers is not possible because of availability or confidentiality, or both, our algorithm for indirect linkage provides a suitable alternative. The matching rate and accuracy will help ensure the accuracy of long-term follow-up and the completeness and representativeness of linked databases for relevant research and quality improvement initiatives.
Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Claims linkage; Medical device research; Registry study; Vascular surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35181518      PMCID: PMC9443721          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.860


  16 in total

1.  Creation and Validation of Linkage Between Orthopedic Registry and Administrative Data Using Indirect Identifiers.

Authors:  Jialin Mao; Caryn D Etkin; David G Lewallen; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Adam W Beck; Jan Nagle; H Gilbert Welch; Robert M Zwolak
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Characterizing Reimbursements for Medicare Patients Receiving Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair at Vascular Quality Initiative Centers.

Authors:  Spencer W Trooboff; Zachary J Wanken; Barbara Gladders; Brian P Lucas; Kayla O Moore; J Aaron Barnes; Art Sedrakyan; Jesse A Columbo; Bjoern D Suckow; David H Stone; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 1.466

4.  Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  David R Holmes; J Matthew Brennan; John S Rumsfeld; David Dai; Sean M O'Brien; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Fred H Edwards; John Carroll; David Shahian; Fred Grover; E Murat Tuzcu; Eric D Peterson; Ralph G Brindis; Michael J Mack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Trends in Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures Between 2009 and 2015: Has Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Made a Difference?

Authors:  Steven D Culler; David J Cohen; Phillip P Brown; Aaron D Kugelmass; Matthew R Reynolds; Karen Ambrose; Michael L Schlosser; April W Simon; Marc R Katz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  National trends in open surgical, endovascular, and branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare patients.

Authors:  Bjoern D Suckow; Philip P Goodney; Jesse A Columbo; Ravinder Kang; David H Stone; Art Sedrakyan; Jack L Cronenwett; Mark F Fillinger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Medicare costs for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Philip P Goodney; Barbara H Gladders; Gregory Tsougranis; Zachary J Wanken; Spencer W Trooboff; Richard J Powell; David H Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Trends in U.S. Cardiovascular Care: 2016 Report From 4 ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registries.

Authors:  Frederick A Masoudi; Angelo Ponirakis; James A de Lemos; James G Jollis; Mark Kremers; John C Messenger; John W M Moore; Issam Moussa; William J Oetgen; Paul D Varosy; Robert N Vincent; Jessica Wei; Jeptha P Curtis; Matthew T Roe; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Judith H Lichtman; Michael R Jones; Erica C Leifheit; Alice J Sheffet; George Howard; Brajesh K Lal; Virginia J Howard; Yun Wang; Jeptha Curtis; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes (VISION) Coordinated Registry Network: An effort to advance evidence evaluation for vascular devices.

Authors:  Greg Tsougranis; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Daniel Bertges; Marc Schermerhorn; Pablo Morales; Scott Williams; Roberta Bloss; Jessica Simons; Sarah E Deery; Salvatore Scali; Graham Roche-Nagle; Leila Mureebe; Matthew Mell; Mahmoud Malas; Brian Pullin; David H Stone; Misti Malone; Adam W Beck; Grace Wang; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Art Sedrakyan; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  1 in total

1.  Survival, reintervention and surveillance reports: long-term, centre-level evaluation and feedback of vascular interventions.

Authors:  Xavier Philip Fowler; Barbara Gladders; Kayla Moore; Jialin Mao; Art Sedrakyan; Philip Goodney
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-10-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.