Literature DB >> 29394992

Trends in Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures Between 2009 and 2015: Has Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Made a Difference?

Steven D Culler1, David J Cohen2, Phillip P Brown3, Aaron D Kugelmass4, Matthew R Reynolds5, Karen Ambrose3, Michael L Schlosser3, April W Simon3, Marc R Katz6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports trends in volume and adverse events associated with isolated aortic valve procedures performed in Medicare beneficiaries between 2009 and 2015.
METHODS: This retrospective study used the annual fiscal year Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file to identify all Medicare beneficiaries undergoing an isolated aortic valve procedure. Outcome measures included three mortality rates and nine in-hospital adverse events. The final study population consisted of 233,660 hospitalizations.
RESULTS: During the study period, Medicare beneficiaries undergoing an aortic valve procedure increased from 22,076 to 49,362, for an average annual growth rate of 14.45%. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries grew from 10.7 in 2012 to 41.1 in 2015. Overall, in-hospital mortality rates, cumulative 30-day mortality rates, and 90-day postdischarge mortality rates declined annually during the study period. However, the 90-day mortality rate for TAVR was nearly double the rate for the tissue surgical aortic valve replacement group. Nearly 68% of Medicare beneficiaries experienced at least one in-hospital adverse event during their index hospitalization. Medicare beneficiaries undergoing TAVR had the lowest observed adverse events rates among the aortic valve procedures in 2015.
CONCLUSIONS: The total number of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing isolated aortic valve procedures increased from 47.5 to 88.9 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries during the study period. Aortic valve procedures increased significantly during this study period primarily due to the increase in TAVR, with clinical outcomes improving as well. Although long-term outcomes of TAVR are still under investigation, these results are promising.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29394992     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

1.  Association of Hospital Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Quality With 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Harun Kundi; Jeffrey J Popma; Kamal R Khabbaz; Louis M Chu; Jordan B Strom; Linda R Valsdottir; Changyu Shen; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 2.  Current status of cardiovascular surgery in Japan, 2015 and 2016, a report based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database. 3-Valvular heart surgery.

Authors:  Tomonobu Abe; Kiyoharu Nakano; Norimichi Hirahara; Noboru Motomura; Hiroaki Miyata; Shinichi Takamoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-03

3.  Substitution of Transcatheter for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Sarah Palmer; Devraj Sukul; Nicholas M Moloci; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Parth K Modi; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Aortic valve replacement among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Rodney L Dunn; Devraj Sukul; Parth K Modi; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Ananda Sen; Julie P Bynum
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 7.538

5.  Validation of an indirect linkage algorithm to combine registry data with Medicare claims.

Authors:  Jialin Mao; Kayla O Moore; Jesse A Columbo; Kunal S Mehta; Philip P Goodney; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 6.  Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Richard L Li; Jonathan Russ; Costas Paschalides; Giovanni Ferrari; Haim Waisman; Jeffrey W Kysar; David Kalfa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Episode Payments for Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Devraj A Sukul; Mary Oerline; Michael P Thompson; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Chad Ellimoottil; Vahakn B Shahinian; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-12-13

Review 8.  Disparities in Cardiac Care of Women: Current Data and Possible Solutions.

Authors:  Rosalyn O Adigun; Amber N Boler; Rekha Mankad
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-09-21

9.  Antithrombotic Strategies After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joel N Papak; Joseph C Chiovaro; North Noelck; Laura D Healy; Michele Freeman; Jacquelyn A Quin; Robin Paynter; Allison Low; Karli Kondo; Owen J T McCarty; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  Global epidemiology of valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Sean Coffey; Ross Roberts-Thomson; Alex Brown; Jonathan Carapetis; Mao Chen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Liesl Zühlke; Bernard D Prendergast
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.