| Literature DB >> 35177035 |
Xinxin Yang1,2, Matthew F Wipperman1,3, Sharon Nachman4, Nicole S Sampson5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current TB diagnostic methods available have been developed for adults and development efforts have neglected the differences in disease and sampling that occur between adults and children. Diagnostic challenges are even greater in HIV co-infected children and infants. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Childhood TB; Diagnosis; HIV co-infection; Lipoprotein; Low-density lipoprotein; Sandwich ELISA; apoB
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35177035 PMCID: PMC8851740 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07140-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1TLP is different from MDA-LDL. A an agarose gel electrophoresis showing TLP is larger in size and more positively charged than native LDL. B Immunoblots showing TLP is recognized by anti- apolipoprotein B (apoB) antibodies (top) but not anti- MDA-LDL antibodies (bottom). Images of the entire gel and blots are in Additional file 1: Figure S1
Fig. 2TLP induces lipid body accumulation in macrophages. Microscopic images of Oil Red O-hematoxylin stained THP-1 macrophage culture treated with PBS control (A), LDL (B), MDA-LDL (C) and TLP (D) at 200 μg/mL for 2 days
Fig. 3Retrospective analysis of P1041 HIV positive plasma samples. A Plasma levels of TLP in HIV positive subjects clinically diagnosed probably having active stage tuberculosis disease (TB) and not having TB (noTB). Individual patients are depicted as dots with group mean. The dashed line represents the detection limit of the assay. *** p < 0.001. B ROC curve of TLP concentration for active TB versus control subjects of HIV positive patients. AUC, area under curve. The dashed line represents the no-discrimination line from the left bottom to the top right corners