Literature DB >> 35176502

Two-sample survival probability curves: A graphical approach for the analysis of time to event data in clinical trials.

Sandra Castro-Pearson1, Chap T Le2, Xianghua Luo2.   

Abstract

With the aim to improve the communication of trial results, we introduce a novel graphical approach that complements the analysis of time to event outcomes in two-arm randomized trials. We define the so-called two-sample survival probability curve and propose a nonparametric estimator of the curve based on a random walk using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for the two arms. We then use the estimated curve to visualize treatment effect as well as potential effect modification of factors of interest. We also propose to estimate two-sample survival probability curves within the framework of the Cox model to graphically assess model fit. The proposed two-sample survival probability plot puts trials in a standardized [0,1] × [0,1] space, allowing for a simple visualization of the main effect, effect modification, and the adequacy of a model fit.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failure times; Hazard ratios; Kaplan-Meier; ROC; Survival analysis; Time to event

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35176502      PMCID: PMC9018539          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.261


  21 in total

1.  Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A solution for the most basic optimization problem associated with an ROC curve.

Authors:  Chap T Le
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression.

Authors:  Michael Schemper; Samo Wakounig; Georg Heinze
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Statistical principles for clinical trials.

Authors:  R Kay
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Evaluation of confounding effects in ROC studies.

Authors:  C T Le
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The 6-MP versus placebo clinical trial in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Edmund A Gehan; Emil J Freireich
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Graphical methods for assessing violations of the proportional hazards assumption in Cox regression.

Authors:  K R Hess
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Understanding and Communicating Measures of Treatment Effect on Survival: Can We Do Better?

Authors:  Everardo D Saad; John R Zalcberg; Julien Péron; Elisabeth Coart; Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc Buyse
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A practical divergence measure for survival distributions that can be estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves.

Authors:  Trevor F Cox; Gabriela Czanner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.