Literature DB >> 35175432

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases at a Diverse Safety Net Hospital.

Howard S Herman1, Max P Rosenthaler2, Noon Elhassan3, Janice M Weinberg3, Venkata R Satyam4, Sharmeel K Wasan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and underrepresented minorities (URMs) historically have below average vaccination rates. URMs have increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. We surveyed IBD patients to assess COVID vaccination attitudes, particularly among URMs.
METHODS: In May and June 2021, all 822 adult patients with IBD, medically homed at a tertiary IBD referral center and safety net hospital, and with access to the electronic patient portal, were sent an electronic survey assessing their attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccination. An additional 115 without access to the patient portal were contacted by phone. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. The primary outcome was vaccination hesitancy, defined as: likely will become vaccinated later this year, but not immediately; unsure if they will get the vaccine; or do not want the vaccine. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of factors associated with vaccination intent.
RESULTS: The mean age was 46.6 years (SD 15.1). 210/1029 patients responded to the survey: 150/822 (18.2%) electronically and 60/115 (52.2%) by phone. Overall vaccine hesitancy rate was 11.9%, significantly higher in younger (aOR for 10-year increments, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.90, p = 0.011), Hispanic (aOR, 7.67; 95% CI, 2.99-21.3, p < 0.0002), and Black patients (aOR, 3.52; 95% CI 1.11-11.1, p = 0.050). Safety concerns were the most cited reasons for vaccine hesitancy.
CONCLUSIONS: URM patients were more vaccine hesitant. Future studies should further explore factors leading to lower vaccination rates among these groups and strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccination rates.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Healthcare disparities; IBD; Inflammatory bowel disease; SARS-CoV-2; Underrepresented minorities; Vaccine; Vaccine hesitancy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35175432      PMCID: PMC8853212          DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07413-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.487


Body of Paper

Background

The Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread throughout the USA and across the world. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) carry the same risk of infection as the general population but may be at increased risk of severe disease [1-4]. Vaccinations were authorized for emergency use in the USA in December 2020 and February 2021, with full approval for one issued in August 2021. The International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases recommends COVID-19 vaccination for all adults with IBD [5]. In a recent survey of patients with IBD, 81% of respondents received or were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine [6]. However, 89% had high educational attainment and 93% identified as White, while less than 5% were Black or of Hispanic ethnicity. In contrast, underrepresented minorities (URMs) historically have had lower vaccination rates due to higher prevalence of mistrust of healthcare institutions [7-14]. Notably, the CDC reported COVID vaccination rates from December 2020 to May 2021 were lower among socially vulnerable Americans such as non-Hispanic White persons, uninsured individuals, or people living in poverty [15]. Among patients with IBD, historical vaccination rates have also been below average, possibly due to concerns about vaccine efficacy and safety in patients on immunosuppressants [16-18]. URMs are also known to have higher rates of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 [19]. Such data suggest that URM patients with IBD will be among the most hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and consequently the most vulnerable to poor outcomes. To date, the rate of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among URM patients with IBD is unknown.

Methods

Patients were recruited from a local population of 1265 adult patients medically homed at the Boston Medical Center (Boston, MA) a tertiary IBD referral center and safety net hospital, identified by diagnosis codes for Crohn’s disease (ICD-10-CM K50), ulcerative colitis (ICD-10-CM K51), or indeterminate colitis (ICD-10-CM K52.3) obtained from the electronic medical record. In May and June 2021, while the COVID-19 vaccines were under Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA, 822 patients were sent an electronic survey assessing their attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccination via the electronic medical record’s patient portal, MyChart (Epic Systems Corp., Verona, WI). A total of 207 patients without access to the patient portal were contacted to complete the survey by phone. Respondents were not provided reimbursement or other incentivization for completing the survey. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record (EMR). Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Boston University, CTSI 1UL1TR001430.19 [20]. The primary outcome was vaccination hesitancy, defined as: likely will become vaccinated later this year, but not immediately; unsure if they will get the vaccine; or do not want the vaccine. Chi-squared analyses were performed to determine which variables were most likely to be significant for multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression was then used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of factors associated with vaccination intent. Odds ratios along with 95% confidence intervals are reported. Analyses were performed using R with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Boston University Medical Campus and Boston Medical Center.

Results

Two hundred and ten of out 1029 participants completed the survey, with 150 responding electronically and 60 by phone. The electronic response rate was 150/822 (18.2%). Due to staffing limitations and the urgency of the pandemic, 207 of the 433 patients without access to MyChart were contacted by phone to complete the survey, of whom 60 (52.2%) completed the survey, 55 declined to participate, and 92 were not reached. The mean age was 46.6 years (standard deviation, 15.1). Demographic and IBD characteristics are presented in Table 1. The overall vaccine hesitancy rate was 11.9%. Vaccine hesitancy was significantly higher in younger patients (aOR for 10-year increments, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46–0.90, p = 0.011), Hispanic patients (27.8% vs. 6.4%, aOR, 7.67; 95% CI, 2.99–21.3, p < 0.0002), and Black patients (15.9% vs. 11.3%, aOR, 3.52; 95% CI 1.11–11.1, p = 0.050). Out of the Black patients, 79.5% had already received the vaccine, 4.5% “wanted to as soon as possible,” 9.1% said “not right away, but likely later in the year,” 4.5% were “undecided,” and 2.3% said “no.” Out of the Hispanic patients, 68.5% had already received the vaccine, 3.7% “wanted to as soon as possible,” 18.5% said “not right away, but likely later in the year,” 5.6% were “undecided,” and 3.7% said “no.” COVID-19 vaccine attitudes are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Patients not on biologics or immunomodulators (15.1% vs. 9.6%) and patients with lower educational attainment (14.1% vs. 4.3%) tended to have higher rates of hesitancy, but these comparisons were not statistically significant. The most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy were “concerns about adverse reactions” (72%), “the vaccine didn’t undergo necessary scrutiny and safety checks” (64%), and “the long-term safety of the COVID vaccine is unknown” (52%).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

N = 210 (%)
Age (years, mean ± SD)46.6 ± 15.1
Male76 (36.2%)
Hispanic54 (25.7%)
Race
White160 (76.2%)
Black44 (21.0%)
Asian Pacific Islander or Native Hawaiian5 (2.4%)
Other1 (0.48%)
Education Level
No high school degree35 (16.7%)
High school graduate or GERD51 (24.3%)
Some college, vocational, or technical school30 (14.3%)
Graduated college47 (22.4%)
Not specified47 (22.4%)
Primary Language
English165 (78.6%)
Spanish44 (21.0)
Cape Verdean/Port Creole1 (0.48%)
Biologics or Immunomodulators104 (49.5%)
Vaccinated for Influenza154 (73.3%)
Table 2

COVID-19 vaccine attitudes

N = 210 (%)
Not Vaccine Hesitant185 (88.10%)
Already vaccinated179 (85.23%)
Want to be vaccinated as soon as possible6 (2.86%)
Vaccine Hesitant25 (11.90%)
Likely will become vaccinated later this year, but not immediately12 (5.71%)
Unsure if they will get the vaccine7 (3.33%)
Do not want the vaccine6 (2.86%)
Reasons for Vaccine Hesitancy
Concerned about adverse reaction18 (72%)
Concerned vaccine could interfere with IBD medication efficacy11 (44%)
Concerned IBD med might make vaccination ineffective9 (36%)
Already had COVID3 (12%)
Negative experiences with last vaccine2 (8%)
Generally don’t take vaccines5 (20%)
Long-term safety of the COVID vaccine is unknown13 (52%)
Concerned vaccine didn’t undergo necessary scrutiny and safety checks16 (64%)
Personal history of allergic reaction1 (4%)
Prefer to watch how others tolerate the vaccine12 (48%)
What can IBD providers do to better inform you about COVID vaccines?
Have a risk/benefit conversation about it11 (44%)
Provide handout information about the vaccine8 (32%)
Provide data about the efficacy among patients with IBD and other immune diseases10 (40%)
Provide data about vaccine efficacy/safety among patients with IBD9 (36%)
Nothing11 (44%)
Unsure2 (8%)
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses

% (fraction)ORb (95% CI)
Vaccine Hesitant11.9% (25/210)
Agea*0.64c (0.46, 0.90)
Vaccine Hesitant40.20
Not Hesitant47.55
Hesitancy by Ethnicity***7.67 (2.99, 21.3)
Hispanic27.8% (15/54)
Not Hispanic6.4% (10/156)
Hesitancy by Race*3.52 (1.12, 11.1)
Black15.9% (7/44)
White11.3% (18/160)
Hesitancy by Education
Associate’s or lower14.1% (23/163)
Bachelor’s or higher4.3% (2/47)
Hesitancy by Treatment Regimen
Taking Biologic or Immunomodulator15.1% (15/106)
Not Taking Biologic or Immunomodulator9.6% (10/104)

Multivariate regression including age, ethnicity, race, and education

aMean age, years

bOR: odds ratio

cOdds ratio for ten-year age differences

*p < 0.05 in univariate and multivariate analyses

***p < 0.00001 in univariate and multivariate analyses

Patient characteristics COVID-19 vaccine attitudes Univariate and multivariate analyses Multivariate regression including age, ethnicity, race, and education aMean age, years bOR: odds ratio cOdds ratio for ten-year age differences *p < 0.05 in univariate and multivariate analyses ***p < 0.00001 in univariate and multivariate analyses

Discussion

COVID vaccination rates in parts of the USA continue to trail stated targets [21]. Our study demonstrates a lower overall rate of COVID-19 hesitancy compared to the prior study of patients with IBD (11.9% vs. 19%) [6], though the prior study was performed when vaccines were first approved for emergency use, whereas our study occurred months later, with many patients already vaccinated. Encouragingly, both populations had lower rates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than the country overall, in which up to 30% of adults remain vaccine hesitant [22]. The above represents a reversal of previous studies for other vaccines in IBD patients [16-18], the reasons for which are not immediately clear. In our population, a relatively higher rate of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was observed among younger, Hispanic, and Black patients. Participants with lower educational attainment and those on biologics or immunomodulators also trended toward higher rates of hesitancy. The results are concordant with previous studies that showed higher vaccine hesitancy among URM patients [7-14]. Reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among URM patients with IBD appear to mirror those seen in non-IBD patients that self-identify with these groups. This distrust in healthcare institutions is due to current or prior negative experiences with health care providers, suspicion about prior racist study practices, belief that minority groups are underrepresented in validating research, and many other complex social and environmental factors. Study strengths include a diverse study population. Limitations include small sample size, survey response bias, and low response rate that may overestimate vaccination intent. Our study demonstrates higher rates of vaccine hesitancy among our URM population, mainly due to concerns about long-term safety. IBD providers should educate and advocate for their URM patients to ensure high uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among all their patients. A recent review provided a useful framework for addressing vaccine hesitancy, which employs an empathetic, informative, and decisive approach. Providers should validate concerns, reassuring that hesitancy is common; they should discuss the risks and benefits, using positive framing to emphasize the benefits of vaccination; and they should strongly recommend getting immunized [23]. The CDC also offers toolkits to help allay concerns and misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccines [24]. Future studies should explore the efficacy of various approaches to increasing COVID-19 vaccination, as well as other possible factors that lead to lower vaccination rates among these groups. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (Jpg 362 kb)
  20 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  The Role of Risk Perception in Flu Vaccine Behavior among African-American and White Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Vicki S Freimuth; Amelia Jamison; Gregory Hancock; Donald Musa; Karen Hilyard; Sandra Crouse Quinn
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Barrier to pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations in Black elderly communities: mistrust.

Authors:  LeWanza M Harris; Nancy P Chin; Kevin Fiscella; Sharon Humiston
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Determinants of trust in the flu vaccine for African Americans and Whites.

Authors:  Vicki S Freimuth; Amelia M Jamison; Ji An; Gregory R Hancock; Sandra Crouse Quinn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Ensuring High and Equitable COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Patients With IBD.

Authors:  Freddy Caldera; Sophie Balzora; Mary S Hayney; Francis A Farraye; Raymond K Cross
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.325

6.  Are Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease at an Increased Risk of Developing SARS-CoV-2 than Patients Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease? Results From a Nationwide Veterans' Affairs Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nabeel Khan; Dhruvan Patel; Dawei Xie; Tyler Pernes; James Lewis; Yu-Xiao Yang
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 12.045

7.  Exploring the Continuum of Vaccine Hesitancy Between African American and White Adults: Results of a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sandra Quinn; Amelia Jamison; Donald Musa; Karen Hilyard; Vicki Freimuth
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2016-12-29

8.  Corticosteroids, But Not TNF Antagonists, Are Associated With Adverse COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Results From an International Registry.

Authors:  Erica J Brenner; Ryan C Ungaro; Richard B Gearry; Gilaad G Kaplan; Michele Kissous-Hunt; James D Lewis; Siew C Ng; Jean-Francois Rahier; Walter Reinisch; Frank M Ruemmele; Flavio Steinwurz; Fox E Underwood; Xian Zhang; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Michael D Kappelman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a British Society of Gastroenterology Inflammatory Bowel Disease section and IBD Clinical Research Group position statement.

Authors:  James L Alexander; Gordon W Moran; Daniel R Gaya; Tim Raine; Ailsa Hart; Nicholas A Kennedy; James O Lindsay; Jonathan MacDonald; Jonathan P Segal; Shaji Sebastian; Christian P Selinger; Miles Parkes; Philip J Smith; Anjan Dhar; Sreedhar Subramanian; Ramesh Arasaradnam; Christopher A Lamb; Tariq Ahmad; Charlie W Lees; Liz Dobson; Ruth Wakeman; Tariq H Iqbal; Ian Arnott; Nick Powell
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-26

10.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: recommendations from an international consensus meeting.

Authors:  Corey A Siegel; Gil Y Melmed; Dermot Pb McGovern; Victoria Rai; Florian Krammer; David T Rubin; Maria T Abreu; Marla C Dubinsky
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  1 in total

1.  SARS-CoV-2-inactivated vaccine hesitancy and the safety in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a single-center study.

Authors:  Yubin Cao; Jiaming Feng; Shihao Duan; Yi Yang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.802

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.