Literature DB >> 35175391

Comparison of the Intestinal Bacteria Between Black Seabass Centropristis striata Reared in Recirculating Aquaculture System and Net Pen.

Cong Yu1, Chen Zhang1, Abba Salisu1,2, Yan Wang3.   

Abstract

Determination of diversity and function of the bacteria in fish gut is essential to understanding the interaction between intestinal bacteria and their host organism. This study compared intestinal bacterial community of black seabass (Centropristis striata) hatched by the same breeding farm but reared in different aquaculture systems, an indoor recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) and an inshore net pen (INP). The fish were fed with formulated feed manufactured by same feed company. Bacteria in fish gut, formulated feed and seawater were identified by 16S rRNA high throughout sequencing (HTS). Total 1484 OTUs, which belonged to 34 phyla and 79 genera, were identified from fish gut, formulated feed and seawater. In fish gut, 24 phyla and 43 genera were identified. Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Firmicutes dominated at the phylum level in fish gut in INP, while Proteobacteria and Firmicutes dominated in fish gut in RAS. Photobacterium, Vibrio, and Cetobacterium dominated at the genus level in fish gut in both INP and RAS. One OTU of Photobacterium occurred in all the fish gut samples, suggesting this bacterium might be the main component of the core microbiota. No significant difference was found in bacterial diversity in fish gut between INP and RAS, suggesting genetic background should be a primary factor determining intestinal bacterial community of black seabass. Bacterial diversity in seawater was high relative to that in fish gut and formulated feed, regardless in INP or RAS. The common OTU between fish gut and seawater was more than that between fish gut and formulated feed in INP, while the common OTU between fish gut and seawater was slightly less than that between fish gut and formulated feed in RAS. These results reveal that the bacteria in formulated feed and seawater could influence the bacteria in fish gut, and their priority in shaping intestinal bacterial community depended on the bacterial composition in feed and seawater. This study reveals that intestinal bacterial community of black seabass was influenced by both genetic background and environmental factors.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35175391     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-022-02789-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  27 in total

Review 1.  The gut flora as a forgotten organ.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hara; Fergus Shanahan
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Fish intestinal microbiome: diversity and symbiosis unravelled by metagenomics.

Authors:  A M Tarnecki; F A Burgos; C L Ray; C R Arias
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 3.  Master recyclers: features and functions of bacteria associated with phytoplankton blooms.

Authors:  Alison Buchan; Gary R LeCleir; Christopher A Gulvik; José M González
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 4.  Bacillus subtilis, an ideal probiotic bacterium to shrimp and fish aquaculture that increase feed digestibility, prevent microbial diseases, and avoid water pollution.

Authors:  Jorge Olmos; Manuel Acosta; Gretel Mendoza; Viviana Pitones
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.

Authors:  Evan Bolyen; Jai Ram Rideout; Matthew R Dillon; Nicholas A Bokulich; Christian C Abnet; Gabriel A Al-Ghalith; Harriet Alexander; Eric J Alm; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Francesco Asnicar; Yang Bai; Jordan E Bisanz; Kyle Bittinger; Asker Brejnrod; Colin J Brislawn; C Titus Brown; Benjamin J Callahan; Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez; John Chase; Emily K Cope; Ricardo Da Silva; Christian Diener; Pieter C Dorrestein; Gavin M Douglas; Daniel M Durall; Claire Duvallet; Christian F Edwardson; Madeleine Ernst; Mehrbod Estaki; Jennifer Fouquier; Julia M Gauglitz; Sean M Gibbons; Deanna L Gibson; Antonio Gonzalez; Kestrel Gorlick; Jiarong Guo; Benjamin Hillmann; Susan Holmes; Hannes Holste; Curtis Huttenhower; Gavin A Huttley; Stefan Janssen; Alan K Jarmusch; Lingjing Jiang; Benjamin D Kaehler; Kyo Bin Kang; Christopher R Keefe; Paul Keim; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Irina Koester; Tomasz Kosciolek; Jorden Kreps; Morgan G I Langille; Joslynn Lee; Ruth Ley; Yong-Xin Liu; Erikka Loftfield; Catherine Lozupone; Massoud Maher; Clarisse Marotz; Bryan D Martin; Daniel McDonald; Lauren J McIver; Alexey V Melnik; Jessica L Metcalf; Sydney C Morgan; Jamie T Morton; Ahmad Turan Naimey; Jose A Navas-Molina; Louis Felix Nothias; Stephanie B Orchanian; Talima Pearson; Samuel L Peoples; Daniel Petras; Mary Lai Preuss; Elmar Pruesse; Lasse Buur Rasmussen; Adam Rivers; Michael S Robeson; Patrick Rosenthal; Nicola Segata; Michael Shaffer; Arron Shiffer; Rashmi Sinha; Se Jin Song; John R Spear; Austin D Swafford; Luke R Thompson; Pedro J Torres; Pauline Trinh; Anupriya Tripathi; Peter J Turnbaugh; Sabah Ul-Hasan; Justin J J van der Hooft; Fernando Vargas; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Emily Vogtmann; Max von Hippel; William Walters; Yunhu Wan; Mingxun Wang; Jonathan Warren; Kyle C Weber; Charles H D Williamson; Amy D Willis; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Jesse R Zaneveld; Yilong Zhang; Qiyun Zhu; Rob Knight; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Environmental conditions and neutral processes shape the skin microbiome of European catfish (Silurus glanis) populations of Southwestern France.

Authors:  Marlène Chiarello; Ivan Paz-Vinas; Charlotte Veyssière; Frédéric Santoul; Géraldine Loot; Jessica Ferriol; Stéphanie Boulêtreau
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.541

Review 7.  The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis.

Authors:  John F Cryan; Kenneth J O'Riordan; Caitlin S M Cowan; Kiran V Sandhu; Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen; Marcus Boehme; Martin G Codagnone; Sofia Cussotto; Christine Fulling; Anna V Golubeva; Katherine E Guzzetta; Minal Jaggar; Caitriona M Long-Smith; Joshua M Lyte; Jason A Martin; Alicia Molinero-Perez; Gerard Moloney; Emanuela Morelli; Enrique Morillas; Rory O'Connor; Joana S Cruz-Pereira; Veronica L Peterson; Kieran Rea; Nathaniel L Ritz; Eoin Sherwin; Simon Spichak; Emily M Teichman; Marcel van de Wouw; Ana Paula Ventura-Silva; Shauna E Wallace-Fitzsimons; Niall Hyland; Gerard Clarke; Timothy G Dinan
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 9.  The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish.

Authors:  Sian Egerton; Sarah Culloty; Jason Whooley; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Environment shapes the fecal microbiome of invasive carp species.

Authors:  Jessica J Eichmiller; Matthew J Hamilton; Christopher Staley; Michael J Sadowsky; Peter W Sorensen
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.