Literature DB >> 35174464

Control of Attention in Rhesus Monkeys Measured Using a Flanker Task.

Thomas C Hassett1, Robert R Hampton2.   

Abstract

At least three processes determine whether information we encounter is attended to or ignored. First, attentional capture occurs when attention is drawn automatically by "bottom up" processes, to distinctive, salient, rewarding, or unexpected stimuli when they enter our sensory field. Second, "top down" attentional control can direct cognitive processing towards goal-relevant targets. Third, selection history, operates through repeated exposure to a stimulus, particularly when associated with reward. Attentional control is measured using tasks that require subjects to selectively attend to goal-relevant stimuli in the face of distractions. In the Eriksen flanker task, human participants report which direction a centrally placed arrow is facing, while ignoring "flanking" arrows that may point in the opposite direction. Attentional control is evident to the extent that performance reflects only the direction of the central arrow. We describe four experiments in which we systematically assessed attentional control in rhesus monkeys using a flanker task. In Experiment 1, monkeys responded according to the identity of a central target, and accuracy and latency varied systematically with manipulations of flanking stimuli, validating our adaptation of the Eriksen flanker task. We then tested for converging evidence of attentional control across three experiments in which flanker performance was modulated by the distance separating targets from flankers (Experiment 2), luminance differences (Experiment 3), and differences in associative value (Experiment 4). The approach described is a new and reliable measure of attentional control in rhesus monkeys that can be applied to a wide range of situations with freely behaving animals.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional Control; Flanker Task; Rhesus Monkeys

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35174464     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02452-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  36 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Interactions between attention and visual short-term memory (VSTM): what can be learnt from individual and developmental differences?

Authors:  Duncan E Astle; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices.

Authors:  Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Self-Control in Chimpanzees Relates to General Intelligence.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Cingulate cortex: diverging data from humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Nick Yeung; Winrich A Freiwald; Matthew Botvinick
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 8.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Persistence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention capture in birds performing an auditory streaming task.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.