Literature DB >> 35174250

Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement Has Decreased for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Procedures: Analysis From 2000 to 2020.

Jordan R Pollock1, Evan H Richman2, Benzi I Estipona2, M Lane Moore1, Joseph C Brinkman3, Nathaniel B Hinckley3, Jack M Haglin1, Anikar Chhabra3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decreases in Medicare reimbursement have been noted among many medical specialties. An in-depth analysis of the subspecialty of orthopaedic sports medicine is needed to determine changes in Medicare reimbursement in this field. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to elucidate the trends in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for orthopaedic sports medicine procedures between 2000 and 2020. It was hypothesized that Medicare reimbursement decreased substantially during the study period. STUDY
DESIGN: Economic decision and analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: The Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool was used to extract Medicare reimbursement information between 2000 and 2020 for 67 procedures related to orthopaedic sports medicine. These values were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated to measure the annual rate of change, and descriptive analyses were performed using the Student t test.
RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2020, inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for the 67 included procedures decreased by an average of 33% (CAGR = -2.2%; R 2 = 0.78). Reimbursement decreased for procedures related to the shoulder and elbow by 34% (CAGR = -2.3%; R 2 = 0.80), for hip-related procedures by 23% (CAGR = -1.4%; R 2 = 0.77), for knee-related procedures by 31% (CAGR = -2.0%; R 2 = 0.81), and for procedures relating to the foot and ankle by 38% (CAGR = -2.5%; R 2 = 0.79).
CONCLUSION: Study findings indicated that inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased substantially between 2000 and 2020 for orthopaedic sports medicine procedures, ranging from a 23% decrease for hip-related procedures to a 38% decrease for foot and ankle-related procedures. The results of this study could be used to provide further context for health care policy decisions and help ensure sustainable financial environments for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; Medicare reimbursement; orthopaedic sports medicine; orthopaedic sports surgeon

Year:  2022        PMID: 35174250      PMCID: PMC8842183          DOI: 10.1177/23259671211073722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med        ISSN: 2325-9671


Medicare was established in the United States to provide medical coverage for those aged >65 years and others with qualifying health conditions. It is currently the largest insurer in the United States. Since its inception, Medicare has been rapidly expanding alongside the growing elderly population. When Medicare was established in 1965, the median life expectancy in the United States was 70.11 years, whereas it is currently estimated to be 78.81 years. The increasing proportion of patients covered by Medicare provides an impetus for economic study. Within Medicare, orthopaedic surgeons are reimbursed a professional procedural fee based on the specific service performed. Each procedure carries a corresponding Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code that is specific to each medical procedure and service. Each CPT code has an assigned physician reimbursement according to the valuation of the relative value units (RVUs) determined by the relative value update committee (RUC). These payments are also adjusted by geographic region. Decreasing Medicare reimbursement has been noted among many specialties. Furthermore, many orthopaedic surgery subspecialties including total joint replacement, trauma, hand and wrist, and shoulder have reported decreases. While these subspecialties have been well defined, there is a paucity of literature regarding Medicare reimbursement in orthopaedic sports medicine. One such applicable study by Moore et al examined arthroscopic procedures and reported a 30% decrease in reimbursement for the included 20 procedures. Notwithstanding, Moore et al examined a limited number of specific arthroscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to further elucidate the trends in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement in the field of orthopaedic sports medicine between 2000 and 2020 and to provide subanalysis by anatomic location. The authors hypothesized that Medicare reimbursement for orthopaedic sports medicine procedures decreased by at least 20% across all anatomic locations during the study period.

Methods

Institutional review board approval was not required for this study, as only publicly available data were used in this analysis. The methods of this study were adapted from similar studies examining Medicare reimbursement trends. Orthopaedic sports medicine–specific procedures were obtained from the orthopaedic sports medicine Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log guidelines, which contain a comprehensive and categorized list of orthopaedic procedures and CPT codes related to orthopaedic sports medicine. Services not existing in 2000 or 2020 were excluded from this analysis (n = 13) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Reasons for Exclusion of 13 Procedures From This Study

CPT CodeDescription of CPT CodeReason for Exclusion
27412Autologous chondrocyte implantation, kneeDid not exist in 2000
27415Osteochondral allograft, knee, openDid not exist in 2000
29806Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; capsulorrhaphyDid not exist in 2000
29807Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; repair of SLAP lesionDid not exist in 2000
29824Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; distal claviculectomy including distal articular surface (Mumford)Did not exist in 2000
29827Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; with rotator cuff repairDid not exist in 2000
29828Treatment for arthroscopic surgical biceps tenodesisDid not exist in 2000
29866Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; osteochondral autograft (eg, mosaicplasty) (includes harvesting of the autograft)Did not exist in 2000
29867Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; osteochondral allograft (eg, mosaicplasty)Did not exist in 2000
29868Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; meniscal transplantation (includes arthrotomy for meniscal insertion)Did not exist in 2000
29873Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with lateral releaseDid not exist in 2000
24345Repair medial collateral ligament, elbow, with local tissueDid not exist in 2000
24346Reconstruction medial collateral ligament, elbow, with tendon graft (includes harvesting of graft)Did not exist in 2000

CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; SLAP, superior labrum anterior and posterior.

Reasons for Exclusion of 13 Procedures From This Study CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; SLAP, superior labrum anterior and posterior. Reimbursement data for each of the included CPT codes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website were obtained by 3 authors (J.R.P., E.H.R., B.I.E.) using the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. The pricing information for each geographic Medicare Administrative Contractor locality across the country between 2000 and 2020 was averaged to obtain a national average reimbursement for each code for each year. To adjust for substantial inflation between 2000 and 2020, the reimbursement averages for each CPT code were adjusted according to the change in Consumer Price Index from the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics website. We adjusted for inflation by multiplying the 2000 reimbursement of each code by the 2000 January inflation multiplier. This process was repeated for each year and each code. The average annual change and total percentage change between 2000 and 2020 were calculated after adjusting for inflation for each procedure and on average across all procedures. These same analyses were performed for each category of sports procedures according to their designation in the ACGME case log. These categories were shoulder and elbow, hip, knee, and foot and ankle. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated using the inflation-adjusted monetary data from 2020 and 2000. The CAGR is a common economic measure that is utilized to control for variability over stretches of time. CAGR also provides a more realistic and precise measure of annual rate of change. CAGR is calculated using the following formula: An R 2 regression value was also calculated to estimate the goodness of fit of the changing reimbursement values to a linear model. Additionally, a subanalysis was performed to compare the average change in reimbursement among all included procedures between 2000-2010 and 2011-2020. This subanalysis was carried out using a 2-tailed t test comparison of means. All statistics and calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel for Office 365 (Microsoft Corp). Alpha level was set at < 0.05.

Results

Overall, inflation-adjusted mean Medicare reimbursement for the included 67 CPT codes decreased from $1171 on average in 2000 to $783 on average in 2020. Additionally, the median inflation-adjusted reimbursement of all codes between 2000 and 2020 decreased by 33% (range, –15% to –84%). This analysis included 67 CPT codes after excluding 13 codes that did not exist in either 2000 or 2020 (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Differences in Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement Between Sports Medicine Procedures

Average Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement, USD
ProcedureNo. of CPT Codes20002020Change
Shoulder and elbow211190777–34%
Hip41043793–23%
Knee291259862–31%
Foot and ankle13984613–38%
Overall671171783–33%

CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars.

Differences in Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement Between Sports Medicine Procedures CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars. Foot and ankle sports medicine procedures had the lowest average reimbursement for all 20 years between 2000 and 2020, while knee procedures had the highest average Medicare reimbursement for all years. All categories experienced a similar downward trend in reimbursement from year to year, ranging from a mean decrease of 23% for hip to 38% for foot and ankle (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Summary of differences among orthopaedic sports medicine procedures between 2000 and 2020. USD, US dollars.

Summary of differences among orthopaedic sports medicine procedures between 2000 and 2020. USD, US dollars. The reimbursement for each individual code is shown in Appendix Table A1. Overall, the mean R 2 regression value for the 67 included orthopaedic sports medicine procedures was 0.78, which was reflective of a moderately strong constant linear decline in reimbursement between 2000 and 2020. The mean CAGR for all included procedures was –2.2%, which was also indicative of a consistent yearly decline in reimbursement between 2000 and 2020 (Appendix Table A1).
Appendix TABLE A1

All 67 Included Procedures and Their Inflation-Adjusted Reimbursement in 2000 and 2020, Sorted by Largest to Smallest Percentage Change

DescriptionReimbursement, USD
CPT Code20002020CAGR R 2 % Change
Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with or without coracoacromial release298261119184–9.1%0.87–84%
Open treatment of metatarsal fracture, with or without internal or external fixation, each284851067585–3.1%0.41–45%
Open treatment of knee dislocation, with or without internal or external fixation; without primary ligamentous repair or augmentation/reconstruction275561627927–2.9%0.83–43%
Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff), open; chronic234121575911–2.8%0.83–42%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscectomy (medial AND lateral), including any meniscal shaving298801024594–2.8%0.92–42%
Open treatment of knee dislocation, with or without internal or external fixation; with primary ligamentous repair2755718751106–2.7%0.85–41%
Repair, primary, open or percutaneous, ruptured Achilles tendon; with graft (includes obtaining graft)276521185704–2.7%0.89–41%
Repair, primary, disrupted ligament, ankle; collateral27695835502–2.6%0.75–40%
Arthroscopy, ankle (tibiotalar and fibulotalar joints), surgical; with removal of loose body or foreign29894876528–2.6%0.78–40%
Repair, secondary, disrupted ligament, ankle, collateral (eg, Watson-Jones procedure)276981118675–2.6%0.80–40%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscectomy (medial OR lateral, including any meniscal shaving)29881942572–2.6%0.92–39%
Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff), open; acute234101436877–2.6%0.52–39%
Repair, primary, disrupted ligament, ankle; both collateral ligaments27696959591–2.5%0.80–38%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; with labral repair (eg, Bankart procedure)2345516991050–2.5%0.79–38%
Repair, dislocating peroneal tendons; without fibular osteotomy27675832520–2.4%0.79–38%
Arthroscopically aided anterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction2988816431036–2.4%0.78–37%
Repair, primary, open or percutaneous, ruptured Achilles tendon276501102696–2.4%0.83–37%
Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty)2342016331036–2.4%0.83–37%
Repair, secondary, Achilles tendon, with or without graft276541188754–2.4%0.74–37%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with coracoid process transfer2346217531129–2.3%0.79–36%
Fasciectomy, plantar fascia; partial (separate procedure)28060592382–2.3%0.73–35%
Open treatment of knee dislocation, with or without internal or external fixation; with primary ligamentous repair, with augmentation/reconstruction2755819371260–2.2%0.84–35%
Arthroscopically aided repair of large osteochondritis dissecans lesion, talar dome fracture298921059690–2.2%0.87–35%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; Putti-Platt procedure or Magnuson-type operation2345015341001–2.2%0.77–35%
Repair, dislocating peroneal tendons; with fibular osteotomy27676966633–2.2%0.79–34%
Osteotomy, proximal tibia, including fibular excision or osteotomy (includes correction of genu varus)2745715321016–2.1%0.82–34%
Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; collateral and cruciate ligaments2740915371022–2.1%0.77–34%
Ligamentous reconstruction (augmentation), knee; extra-articular274271130752–2.1%0.79–33%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with bone block2346017291151–2.1%0.79–33%
Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, posterior, with or without bone block2346517721182–2.1%0.80–33%
Reconstruction of dislocating patella; with extensor realignment and/or muscle advancement or release (eg, Campbell, Goldwaite-type procedure)274221179787–2.1%0.78–33%
Reconstruction of dislocating patella (eg, Hauser-type procedure)274201175786–2.1%0.79–33%
Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; collateral274051067715–2.1%0.75–33%
Reconstruction of dislocating patella; with patellectomy274241175791–2.1%0.77–33%
Arthrotomy with meniscus repair, knee274031004680–2.0%0.78–32%
Open treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation, acute or chronic23550889606–2.0%0.76–32%
Resection or transplantation of long tendon of biceps234401169810–1.9%0.77–31%
Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, any type multidirectional instability2346616891173–1.9%0.76–31%
Tenodesis of long tendon of biceps234301142798–1.9%0.75–30%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; debridement, limited29837795557–1.8%0.80–30%
Arthroscopy, ankle, surgical; excision of osteochondral defect of talus and/or tibia, including drilling298911009709–1.8%0.83–30%
Acromioplasty or acromionectomy, partial, with or without coracoacromial ligament release23130939661–1.8%0.72–30%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscus repair (medial OR lateral)298821038732–1.8%0.73–30%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; synovectomy, partial29835760538–1.8%0.79–29%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; with removal of loose body or foreign body29834736520–1.8%0.80–29%
Arthroscopy, hip, surgical; with removal of loose body or foreign body298611072762–1.8%0.74–29%
Open treatment of patellar dislocation, with or without partial or total patellectomy/reconstruction275661327944–1.8%0.81–29%
Lateral retinacular release, open27425669476–1.8%0.69–29%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; debridement, extensive29838875626–1.7%0.81–28%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; synovectomy, complete29836862618–1.7%0.80–28%
Coracoacromial ligament release, with or without acromioplasty234151044748–1.7%0.81–28%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; abrasion arthroplasty (includes chondroplasty where necessary)29879972699–1.7%0.73–28%
Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; cruciate274071164840–1.7%0.73–28%
Open treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation, acute or chronic; with fascial graft (includes obtaining graft)23552955691–1.7%0.79–28%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; drilling for intact osteochondritis dissecans lesion with internal fixation298871097794–1.7%0.71–28%
Arthroscopy, elbow, diagnostic, with or without synovial biopsy (separate procedure)29830664483–1.7%0.78–27%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty)29877897656–1.6%0.72–27%
Ligamentous reconstruction (augmentation), knee; intra-articular (open)2742816051178–1.6%0.77–27%
Arthroscopy, hip, surgical; with debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty), abrasion arthroplasty, and/or resection of labrum298621150852–1.6%0.79–26%
Claviculectomy; partial23120842631–1.5%0.66–25%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; drilling for osteochondritis dissecans with bone grafting, with or without internal fixation (including debridement of base of lesion)298851054797–1.5%0.72–24%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; osteochondral autograft (eg, mosaicplasty) (includes harvesting of the autograft)29866884672–1.4%0.69–24%
Arthroscopy, hip, surgical; with synovectomy298631116855–1.4%0.73–23%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscus repair (medial AND lateral)298831128889–1.2%0.81–21%
Arthroscopically aided posterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction2988915901292–1.1%0.82–19%
Ligamentous reconstruction (augmentation), knee; intra-articular (open) and extra-articular2742916131325–1.0%0.80–18%
Arthroscopy, hip, diagnostic with or without synovial biopsy (separate procedure)29860833705–0.9%0.75–15%
Mean1171783–2.2%0.78–33%
Median1102748–2.1%0.79–33%

CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollar.

Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for the 21 shoulder and elbow procedures decreased from $1190 in 2000 to $777 in 2020 (34% decrease). The largest decrease (84% decrease) was seen for CPT code 29826, which represents subacromial space decompression with partial acromioplasty and coracoacromial release. The smallest decrease (25% decrease) was seen for CPT code 23120, which represents partial claviculectomy (Table 3).
TABLE 3

Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement Between 2000 and 2020 by Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Shoulder and Elbow CPT Code

Reimbursement, USD
DescriptionCPT Code20002020CAGR R 2 % Change
Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with or without coracoacromial release298261119184–9.1%0.88–84%
Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff), open; acute234101436877–2.6%0.58–39%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; with labral repair (eg, Bankart procedure)2345516991050–2.5%0.82–38%
Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty)2342016331036–2.4%0.85–37%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with coracoid process transfer2346217531129–2.3%0.82–36%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; Putti-Platt procedure or Magnuson-type operation2345015341001–2.2%0.80–35%
Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with bone block2346017291151–2.1%0.82–33%
Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, posterior, with or without bone block2346517721182–2.1%0.83–33%
Open treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation, acute or chronic23550889606–2.0%0.80–32%
Resection or transplantation of long tendon of biceps234401169810–1.9%0.79–31%
Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, any type multidirectional instability2346616891173–1.9%0.79–31%
Tenodesis of long tendon of biceps234301142798–1.9%0.77–30%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; debridement, limited29837795557–1.8%0.83–30%
Acromioplasty or acromionectomy, partial, with or without coracoacromial ligament release23130939661–1.8%0.75–30%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; synovectomy, partial29835760538–1.8%0.82–29%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; with removal of loose body or foreign body29834736520–1.8%0.83–29%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; debridement, extensive29838875626–1.7%0.83–28%
Arthroscopy, elbow, surgical; synovectomy, complete29836862618–1.7%0.83–28%
Open treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation, acute or chronic; with fascial graft (includes obtaining graft)23552955691–1.7%0.81–28%
Arthroscopy, elbow, diagnostic, with or without synovial biopsy (separate procedure)29830664483–1.7%0.81–27%
Claviculectomy; partial23120842631–1.5%0.67–25%
Mean1190777–2.3%0.80–34%
Median1119691–1.9%0.82–31%

CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars.

Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement Between 2000 and 2020 by Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Shoulder and Elbow CPT Code CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars. Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for the 4 hip procedures decreased from $1043 in 2000 to $793 in 2020 (23% decrease). The largest decrease (29% decrease) was seen for CPT code 29861, which is hip arthroscopy with removal of loose body or foreign body. The smallest decrease (15% decrease) was seen for CPT code 29860, which is diagnostic hip arthroscopy with or without synovial biopsy (Table 4).
TABLE 4

Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement, 2000-2020: Hip Codes

Reimbursement, USD
DescriptionCPT Code20002020CAGR R 2 % Change
Arthroscopy, hip, surgical; with removal of loose body or foreign body298611072762–1.8%0.77–29%
Arthroscopy, hip, surgical; with debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty), abrasion arthroplasty, and/or resection of labrum298621150852–1.6%0.81–26%
Arthroscopy, hip, surgical; with synovectomy298631116855–1.4%0.77–23%
Arthroscopy, hip, diagnostic with or without synovial biopsy (separate procedure)29860833705–0.9%0.74–15%
Mean1043793–1.4%0.77–23%
Median1094807–1.5%0.77–25%

CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars.

Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement, 2000-2020: Hip Codes CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars. Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for knee procedures decreased from $1259 in 2000 to $862 in 2020 (31% decrease). The largest decrease (43% decrease) was seen for CPT code 27556, which is open treatment of knee dislocation without primary ligamentous repair or augmentation/reconstruction. The smallest decrease (18% decrease) was seen for CPT code 27429, which is intra-articular and extra-articular ligamentous reconstruction (augmentation) of the knee (Table 5).
TABLE 5

Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement, 2000-2020: Knee Codes

Reimbursement, USD
DescriptionCPT code20002020CAGR R 2 % Change
Open treatment of knee dislocation, with or without internal or external fixation; without primary ligamentous repair or augmentation/reconstruction275561627927–2.9%0.85–43%
Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff), open; chronic234121575911–2.8%0.85–42%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscectomy (medial AND lateral, including any meniscal shaving298801024594–2.8%0.93–42%
Open treatment of knee dislocation, with or without internal or external fixation; with primary ligamentous repair2755718751106–2.7%0.87–41%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscectomy (medial OR lateral, including any meniscal shaving)29881942572–2.6%0.93–39%
Arthroscopically aided anterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction2988816431036–2.4%0.80–37%
Open treatment of knee dislocation, with or without internal or external fixation; with primary ligamentous repair, with augmentation/reconstruction2755819371260–2.2%0.86–35%
Osteotomy, proximal tibia, including fibular excision or osteotomy (includes correction of genu varus)2745715321016–2.1%0.84–34%
Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; collateral and cruciate ligaments2740915371022–2.1%0.80–34%
Ligamentous reconstruction (augmentation), knee; extra-articular274271130752–2.1%0.81–33%
Reconstruction of dislocating patella; with extensor realignment and/or muscle advancement or release (eg, Campbell, Goldwaite-type procedure)274221179787–2.1%0.81–33%
Reconstruction of dislocating patella (eg, Hauser-type procedure)274201175786–2.1%0.81–33%
Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; collateral274051067715–2.1%0.78–33%
Reconstruction of dislocating patella; with patellectomy274241175791–2.1%0.80–33%
Arthrotomy with meniscus repair, knee274031004680–2.0%0.81–32%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscus repair (medial OR lateral)298821038732–1.8%0.75–30%
Open treatment of patellar dislocation, with or without partial or total patellectomy/reconstruction275661327944–1.8%0.84–29%
Lateral retinacular release, open27425669476–1.8%0.73–29%
Coracoacromial ligament release, with or without acromioplasty234151044748–1.7%0.81–28%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; abrasion arthroplasty (includes chondroplasty where necessary)29879972699–1.7%0.76–28%
Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; cruciate274071164840–1.7%0.76–28%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; drilling for intact osteochondritis dissecans lesion with internal fixation298871097794–1.7%0.74–28%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty)29877897656–1.6%0.75–27%
Ligamentous reconstruction (augmentation), knee; intra-articular (open)2742816051178–1.6%0.80–27%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; drilling for osteochondritis dissecans with bone grafting, with or without internal fixation (including debridement of base of lesion)298851054797–1.5%0.76–24%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; osteochondral autograft (eg, mosaicplasty) (includes harvesting of the autograft)29866884672–1.4%0.73–24%
Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscus repair (medial AND lateral)298831128889–1.2%0.82–21%
Arthroscopically aided posterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction2988915901292–1.1%0.82–19%
Ligamentous reconstruction (augmentation), knee; intra-articular (open) and extra-articular2742916131325–1.0%0.81–18%
Mean1259862–2.0%0.81–31%
Median1164794–2.0%0.81–32%

CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars.

Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement, 2000-2020: Knee Codes CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars. Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for foot and ankle procedures decreased from $984 in 2000 to $613 in 2020 (38% decrease). The largest decrease (45% decrease) was seen for CPT code 28485, which is open treatment of a metatarsal fracture. The smallest decrease (30% decrease) was seen for CPT code 29891, which is ankle arthroscopy with excision of osteochondral defect of talus and/or tibia, including drilling (Table 6).
TABLE 6

Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement, 2000-2020: Foot and Ankle Codes

Reimbursement, USD
DescriptionCPT Code20002020CAGR R 2 % Change
Open treatment of metatarsal fracture, with or without internal or external fixation, each284851067.2585.5–3.1%0.39–45%
Repair, primary, open or percutaneous, ruptured Achilles tendon; with graft (includes obtaining graft)276521184.8703.7–2.7%0.90–41%
Repair, primary, disrupted ligament, ankle; collateral27695835.3502.1–2.6%0.78–40%
Arthroscopy, ankle (tibiotalar and fibulotalar joints), surgical; with removal of loose body or foreign29894875.6528.0–2.6%0.81–40%
Repair, secondary, disrupted ligament, ankle, collateral (eg, Watson-Jones procedure)276981117.7674.7–2.6%0.82–40%
Repair, primary, disrupted ligament, ankle; both collateral ligaments27696959.0591.0–2.5%0.82–38%
Repair, dislocating peroneal tendons; without fibular osteotomy27675831.7519.6–2.4%0.81–38%
Repair, primary, open or percutaneous, ruptured Achilles tendon276501102.1696.0–2.4%0.85–37%
Repair, secondary, Achilles tendon, with or without graft276541188.5754.3–2.4%0.77–37%
Fasciectomy, plantar fascia; partial (separate procedure)28060591.5381.6–2.3%0.75–35%
Arthroscopically aided repair of large osteochondritis dissecans lesion, talar dome fracture298921058.8690.0–2.2%0.88–35%
Repair, dislocating peroneal tendons; with fibular osteotomy27676966.3633.0–2.2%0.82–34%
Arthroscopy, ankle, surgical; excision of osteochondral defect of talus and/or tibia, including drilling298911008.7709.0–1.8%0.85–30%
Mean984613–2.5%0.79–38%
Median1009633–2.4%0.82–38%

CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars.

Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement, 2000-2020: Foot and Ankle Codes CAGR, compound annual growth rate; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; USD, US dollars. The subanalysis regarding the mean adjusted reimbursement values for all procedures between 2000-2010 and 2011-2020 revealed a statistically significant difference between the 2 time periods (P < .0001) (Table 7).
TABLE 7

Change in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Medicare Reimbursement: 2000-2010 Versus 2011-2020

2000-20102011-2020 P
Average % change in reimbursement–26.0%–12.0%<.0001
Change in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine–Related Medicare Reimbursement: 2000-2010 Versus 2011-2020

Discussion

We found that Medicare inflation-adjusted reimbursement decreased substantially between 2000 and 2020 for orthopaedic sports medicine procedures. There was a 33% mean decrease overall, ranging from a 23% decrease in reimbursement for orthopaedic sports medicine hip-related codes to 38% for orthopaedic sports medicine foot and ankle–related codes. Throughout this time period, the sports medicine codes with the highest reimbursement each year were related to knee procedures, while the codes associated with the lowest reimbursement each year were related to foot and ankle procedures. There was also evidence of a consistent yearly decline in reimbursement, which is reflected by an R 2 value of 0.78 and a CAGR of –2.2%. These decreases in reimbursement are compounded by a large increase of Medicare patients, with Medicare beneficiaries increasing from 13.5% of the US population in 2000 to nearly 18.1% in 2019. While the proportion of patients covered by Medicare in sports medicine orthopaedic practices remains unclear, changes in Medicare reimbursement have been shown to substantially affect private payors, and as such, changes to Medicare reimbursement have a far-reaching effect. The results of this study could be used to provide further context for health care policy decisions and help ensure sustainable financial environments for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons. Orthopaedic sports medicine has experienced a similar decrease in reimbursement to other fields of orthopaedic surgery, with the mean inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreasing 39% for hip and knee arthroplasty, 27% for shoulder and elbow surgeries, 22.6% for hand surgeries, 30% for commonly performed arthroscopy procedures, and 30% for orthopaedic trauma. Accordingly, this study corroborates the findings of decreasing reimbursement found in other subspecialties of orthopaedic surgery and further defines the reimbursement decrease in orthopaedic sports medicine (Appendix Table A2).
Appendix TABLE A2

Current Literature Relating to Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement in Orthopaedic Surgery

StudyProcedure TypeYears StudiedInflation-Adjusted Reimbursement ChangesNo. of CPT Codes in Study
Eltorai et al 13 General orthopaedics2000 to 2016Decreased by 10%-41%25
Walker et al 42 General orthopaedics2000 to 2015Decreased by 29%≥200
Malik et al 28 Shoulder and elbow2002 to 2018Decreased by 27%39
Lopez et al 25 Shoulder arthroplasty2012 and 2017Decreased by 7%-12%3
Thornburg et al 40 Hand (plastic surgery)2000 to 2019Decreased by 23%20
Malik et al 27 Hand surgery (orthopaedics)2002 to 2018Decreased by 21%20
Haglin et al 19 Trauma2000 to 2020Decreased by 30%20
Haglin et al 17 Hip and knee arthroplasty2000 to 2019Decreased by 39%7
Acuña et al 2 Revision hip arthroplasty2002 to 2019Decreased by 19%-28%8
Jella et al 23 Revision total knee arthroplasty2002 to 2019Decreased by 24%-33%6
Moore et al 29 Arthroscopy2000 to 2020Decreased by 30%20
Haglin et al 20 Spine (excluding cranial neurosurgery codes)2000 to 2018Decreased by 28%10
Lopez et al 26 Lumbar spine fusion and discectomy2012 and 2017Decreased by 7%-11%9

CPT, Current Procedural Terminology.

It is traditionally thought that Medicare reimbursement is significantly less than that of commercial payors. However, this difference varies by procedure. For example, the commercial payor average for “shoulder arthroscopy” in 2011 was more than double that of Medicare reimbursement, while commercial payment for “shoulder arthroscopy: capsulorrhaphy” was only 16% more than Medicare reimbursement. While both commercial and Medicare payments for orthopaedic surgeries were noted to decrease markedly between 2010 and 2018, Medicare payments decreased by an average of 1.5 times faster than commercial payments. This study also found that, on average, payments from Medicare for orthopaedic surgeries were 57% less than payments from commercial payors. The decreasing reimbursement trends seen in this study for orthopaedic sports medicine are likely similar to decreasing reimbursement trends by commercial payors, albeit to a lesser degree. Reimbursement trends of large, commercial payors warrant future analysis to further define these trends. Health care policy changes over the last 2 decades further contextualize the findings of decreasing Medicare reimbursement, such as the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), Medicare Access and Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), and bundled payment programs. The BBA was enacted in 1997 and created the sustainable growth rate (SGR), which cut payment for physicians, and by 2002, the SGR reduced overall payment rates by 4.8%. After years of physician payment cuts from the SGR, the BBA was subsequently replaced by MACRA in 2015 in an attempt to focus on quality of services rather than quantity of services. Under MACRA, 2 payment options were created in 2017 named Alternative Payment Models and Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). These models were designed to give positive or negative payment adjustments based on certain parameters of care. As a result of the changes brought about from these health care policy changes, investigations have aimed to help orthopaedic surgeons understand how to navigate these changes. In the context of these policies, this study found a statistically significant difference between 2000-2010 and 2011-2020 reimbursement differences. The average decrease in reimbursement for orthopaedic sports procedures was 26% between 2000 and 2010 and 12% between 2011 and 2020. Annual adjustments to CPT code pricing are made on an annual basis by the RUC, based on many factors, including physician work and time required to perform a service, practice expense, and malpractice costs. This committee consists of 32 volunteer physicians from various specialties, including 1 representative orthopaedic surgeon. These physicians alter the valuation of CPT codes by adjusting the associated RVUs. The 3 RVU components, which hold different weights, are work RVU, practice expense RVU, and malpractice RVU. These RVUs also have a geographic adjustment named the work geographic pricing cost index (GPCI), practice expense GPCI, and malpractice GPCI. These factors are multiplied together with the yearly conversion factor to determine physician payment. It has been reported that the RVUs and payment determined by the RUC may not accurately reflect work effort for certain procedures. A prominent example of this is septic revision total hip arthroplasty, in which the complexity and difficulty of the case are not reflected in the RVU and payments determined by the RUC. As a result, surgeons may limit or avoid performing certain procedures and ultimately limit access for patients to needed procedures. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that arthroscopic procedures generate more RVUs per hour than the same procedures performed using an open approach. These changes could influence surgical treatment decisions unnecessarily. Our study found heterogeneity between the rate of decreasing reimbursement between different procedure categories, with foot and ankle codes exhibiting the largest decrease. Awareness of these trends is necessary to ensure equitable reimbursement between subspecialties and procedures, all of which play a critical role in providing quality orthopaedic care in the United States. Future study is needed to explore possible solutions to decreasing Medicare reimbursement in orthopaedic sports medicine surgery. This study is not without limitations. This study only used the data from a single payor. Therefore, the trends observed in this study may not represent reimbursement by third-party payors. Further study is needed to elucidate trends in reimbursement amount from third-party payors between 2000 and 2020. The authors of this study understand that the limited number of codes included do not represent all the possible procedures and services performed by orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons. However, the authors believe that the CPT codes included in this analysis likely represent a balanced picture of a typical orthopaedic sports medicine surgical practice. Further study is needed to fully analyze the effects of decreased Medicare reimbursement in orthopaedic sports medicine on surgeons, patients, and hospitals.

Conclusion

Medicare reimbursement decreased substantially between 2000 and 2020 for orthopaedic sports medicine procedures, ranging from a 23% decrease in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for hip-related procedures to a 38% decrease for foot and ankle–related procedures. The results of this study could be used to provide further context for health care policy decisions and help ensure sustainable financial environments for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons.
  30 in total

1.  The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and the financial health of teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Robert L Phillips; George E Fryer; Frederick M Chen; Sarah E Morgan; Larry A Green; Ernest Valente; Thomas J Miyoshi
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Medicare Reimbursement to Physicians Decreased for Common Emergency Medicine Services From 2000 to 2020.

Authors:  Jordan R Pollock; Tanner R Bollig; Jack M Haglin; Benjamin J Sandefur; Douglas E Rappaport; Rachel A Lindor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Committee Representation and Medicare Reimbursements-An Examination of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

Authors:  Y Nina Gao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures.

Authors:  Cesar D Lopez; Venkat Boddapati; Joseph M Lombardi; Nathan J Lee; Comron Saifi; Marc D Dyrszka; Zeeshan M Sardar; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Septic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Adequately Compensated by Work Relative Value Units.

Authors:  Theodore Quan; Matthew J Best; Alex Gu; Seth Stake; Gregory J Golladay; Savyasachi C Thakkar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Temporal Analysis of Medicare Physician Reimbursement and Procedural Volume for all Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Billed to Medicare Part B From 2000 to 2019.

Authors:  Jack M Haglin; Jaymeson R Arthur; David G Deckey; Justin L Makovicka; Jordan R Pollock; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Quantifying and Predicting Surgeon Work Input in Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark J Isaacson; Kevin J Bunn; Philip C Noble; Sabir K Ismaily; Stephen J Incavo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Medicare Reimbursement for General Surgery Procedures: 2000 to 2018.

Authors:  Jack M Haglin; Adam E M Eltorai; Kent R Richter; Kristen Jogerst; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Decreasing physician Medicare reimbursement for dermatology services.

Authors:  Jordan R Pollock; Joyce Y Chen; Daniel A Dorius; Jack M Haglin; David L Swanson; Kyle Williams; Shawn G Kwatra; Shari A Ochoa; Aaron R Mangold
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Reimbursement for Orthopaedic Surgeries in Commercial and Public Payors: A Race to the Bottom.

Authors:  Kevin Y Wang; Adam Margalit; Savyasachi C Thakkar; Nigel N Hsu; Uma Srikumaran; James R Ficke; Amit Jain
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.000

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of a Non-Compete Clause on Patient Care and Orthopaedic Surgeons in the State of Louisiana: Afraid of a Little Competition?

Authors:  William F Sherman; Akshar H Patel; Bailey J Ross; Olivia C Lee; Claude S Williams; Felix H Savoie
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.