Literature DB >> 30921048

Medicare Reimbursement for General Surgery Procedures: 2000 to 2018.

Jack M Haglin1, Adam E M Eltorai2, Kent R Richter1, Kristen Jogerst3, Alan H Daniels2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate monetary trends from 2000 to 2018 in Medicare reimbursement rates for the most common general surgery procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A complete understanding of financial trends in general surgery in the United States is lacking. As such, an evaluation of trends in reimbursement rates in general surgery is important for defining the specialty's current and future financial health.
METHODS: The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was queried for each of the 20 top codes top in general surgery. The total raw percent change in Medicare reimbursement rate for each procedure from 2000 to 2018 was calculated and averaged. All data was corrected for inflation. Both average annual and total percentage change were calculated based on these adjusted trends. Compound annual growth rate was calculated using the adjusted data.
RESULTS: After adjusting all data for inflation, the reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 24.4% throughout the study period. During this time, the adjusted reimbursement rate decreased by an average of 1.4% each year with an average compound annual growth rate of -1.6%.
CONCLUSION: After adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement rates in general surgery have steadily decreased from 2000 to 2018. It is important that these trends are understood and considered by surgeons, healthcare administrators, and policy-makers in order to develop and implement agreeable models of reimbursement while ensuring access to quality general surgery care in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30921048     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  6 in total

1.  Validity of operative information in Japanese administrative data: a chart review-based analysis of 1221 cases at a single institution.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Takako Yoshimoto; Michimasa Fujiogi; Hayato Yamana; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.540

2.  Orthopaedic Group Practice Size Is Increasing.

Authors:  Jordan R Pollock; M Lane Moore; Jacob S Hogan; Jack M Haglin; Joseph C Brinkman; Matthew K Doan; Anikar Chhabra
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-04

3.  Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement Has Decreased for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Procedures: Analysis From 2000 to 2020.

Authors:  Jordan R Pollock; Evan H Richman; Benzi I Estipona; M Lane Moore; Joseph C Brinkman; Nathaniel B Hinckley; Jack M Haglin; Anikar Chhabra
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-11

4.  Between 2000 and 2020, Reimbursement for Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery Decreased by 30.

Authors:  Jordan R Pollock; M Lane Moore; Jack M Haglin; Matthew P LeBlanc; Christian S Rosenow; Justin L Makovicka; David G Deckey; Jeffrey D Hassebrock; Joshua S Bingham; Karan A Patel
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-24

5.  Medicare Payment for Orthopaedic Oncology Procedures Over the Past 20 Years.

Authors:  Jordan R Pollock; Evan H Richman; Nicolas P Kuttner; Joseph C Brinkman; Nathaniel B Hinckley; Jack M Haglin; M Lane Moore; Sean V McGarry
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  What Is the Quality of Surgical Care for Patients with Hip Fractures at Critical Access Hospitals?

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; Janice M Bonsu; Megan Roser; Safdar N Khan; Laura S Phieffer; Thuan V Ly; Ryan K Harrison; Carmen E Quatman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.