| Literature DB >> 35173380 |
Raouf Hammami1,2, Javier Gene-Morales3,4, Fathi Abed1,2, Mohamed Amin Selmi1,5, Jason Moran6, Juan C Colado3,7, Hait Hem Rebai2.
Abstract
The main aim was to evaluate the changes in dynamic, reactive, and power strength, and balance (as volleyball performance-related parameters) in pubertal volleyball players when a part of their normal inseason training regimen was replaced by an elastic band training (EBT). 27 male elite volleyball players were randomly allocated to intervention (N = 14; 14.86 ± 0.52 years) or control group (N = 13; 14.74 ± 0.36 years). The intervention consisted of an 8-week EBT program focused on the training of the lower limb, with different volumes and intensities. Countermovement jump (CMJ) and standing long jump (SLJ) were used to assess the power strength, squat one repetition-maximum, and reactive strength index to assess dynamic and reactive strength, respectively. Also, the balance was assessed through different parameters of the foot centre of pressure (CoP) displacements obtained with a force platform. An ANOVA of repeated measurements and post-hoc tests evaluated differences between groups and between baseline and post-intervention. Dynamic and power (CMJ and SLJ) strength, and anteroposterior displacement of the CoP were improved after the intervention. The control group only improved the dynamic strength. No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) were found in the rest of the variables. EBT improves jump performance and other volleyball performance-related parameters in adolescent male athletes and should be considered to complement regular volleyball in-season training.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Balance; Dynamic and power strength; Lower extremity; Reactive strength; Variable resistance exercise
Year: 2021 PMID: 35173380 PMCID: PMC8805364 DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.101601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sport ISSN: 0860-021X Impact factor: 2.806
Characteristics of the study participants.
| Characteristic | EBTG | CG |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 14.86 | 0.52 | 14.74 | 0.36 | 0.29 |
|
| 182.14 | 7.19 | 179.08 | 3.12 | 0.52 |
|
| 70.93 | 12.46 | 68.15 | 6.14 | 0.43 |
|
| 14.29 | 4.03 | 14.39 | 1.87 | 0.74 |
|
| 1.55 | 0.67 | 1.32 | 0.45 | 0.28 |
|
| 13.30 | 0.40 | 13.40 | 0.30 | 0.96 |
Notes: Values are presented as mean (M) and standard deviations (SD), and level of significance (p-value) of the comparison between groups. BM: body mass; BF%: body fat percentage, PHV: peak height velocity, APHV: predicted age at PHV, EBTG: elastic band training group, CG: control group. Previous research on the calculations of PHV and APHV can be consulted [21–23].
Details of elastic band resistance training performed by the experimental group over the 8-week intervention.
| Exercises | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squat | 2 × 10 | 2 × 12 | 3 × 10 | 3 × 12 | 4 × 10 | 4 × 12 | 4 × 15 | 4 × 15 |
| FL | 2 × 10 | 2 × 12 | 3 × 10 | 3 × 12 | 4 × 10 | 4 × 12 | 4 × 15 | 4 × 15 |
| LL | 2 × 10 | 2 × 12 | 3 × 10 | 3 × 12 | 4 × 10 | 4 × 12 | 4 × 15 | 4 × 15 |
| SFL | 2 × 10 | 2 × 12 | 3 × 10 | 3 × 12 | 4 × 10 | 4 × 12 | 4 × 15 | 4 × 15 |
Notes: Displayed values are sets and repetitions.
weeks 1–4 black band (Heavy), with a 60-second rest period between sets
weeks 5–6 silver band (Hard), with a 90-second rest period between sets; and
weeks 7–8 gold band (Very hard), with a 90-second rest period between sets. FL: forward lunge; LL: lateral lunge; SFL: standing frontal stabilisation. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) at the beginning of each set performed was of about 4, and it was always immediately stopped the set if RPE exceeded the value of 6. Each one of the repetitions, of each concentric phase of each set, was always performed at a volitional maximum speed.
Between and within groups differences in experimental and control groups before and after the 8-week intervention.
| Variable | Group | Pre | Post | Δ% | ANOVA (group x time) | Bonferroni post-hoc (time) p-value (ES: | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| EBTG | 99.14 | 21.60 | 124.36 | 26.86 |
| ||
|
| EBTG | 1.35 | 0.15 | 1.57 | 0.16 | F(1, 25) = 2.40, | ||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| EBTG | 33.36 | 3.70 | 36.83 | 4.00 | |||
|
| EBTG | 201.29 | 24.93 | 220.00 | 26.02 | |||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| EBTG | 465.18 | 265.21 | 483.24 | 310.11 | 2.88 | F(1, 25) = 0.05, | 0.99 (0.003) |
|
| EBTG | 533.97 | 211.61 | 498.47 | 212.94 | -6.65 | F(1, 25) = 2.18, | 0.19 (0.37) |
|
| EBTG | 637.21 | 234.58 | 526.31 | 200.38 | - | ||
|
| EBTG | 17.84 | 6.02 | 16.48 | 5.53 | -7.62 | F(1, 25) = 2.31, | 0.09 (0.49) |
Statistically significant difference between experimental and control group in post-intervention values. Numbers in bold type highlight statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Values are presented as mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and percentage of variation from baseline to follow up (Δ%); F values, level of significance (p-value), and effect sizes (ES; eta partial squared (ƞp²); Cohen’s d (d)) in brackets of the between and within groups comparison are also displayed. EBTG: elastic band training group; CG: control group; 1RM: one repetition maximum; reactive strength index (RSI) was calculated as a ratio of the jump height (m) divided by the contact time with the ground (s); CMJ: countermovement jump; SLJ: standing long jump; CoP SA: centre of pressure sway area (representing the ellipse area covered by the trajectory of the CoP); CoP X: centre of pressure displacement in the mediolateral plane; CoP Y: centre of pressure displacement in the anteroposterior plane; V: velocity of the displacement of the CoP. For all the balance parameters (CoP), the lower the value the better the result.