Literature DB >> 25252390

Use of CAHPS patient experience surveys to assess the impact of health care innovations.

Robin M Weinick, Denise D Quigley, Lauren A Mayer, Clarissa D Sellers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys are the standard for collecting information about patient experience of care in the United States. However, despite their widespread use, including in pay-for-performance and public reporting efforts and various provisions of the Affordable Care Act, knowledge about the use of CAHPS in assessing the impact of quality improvement efforts is limited. A study was conducted to examine the use of patient experience surveys in assessing the impact of innovations implemented in health care settings.
METHODS: Innovation profiles identified on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Health Care Innovations Exchange website that included patient experience (including patient satisfaction) as an outcome (N = 201), were analyzed with a variety of qualitative analysis methods.
RESULTS: Fewer than half of the innovations used a patient experience measure, most commonly employing global measures such as an overall rating. Most innovations assessed patient experience at a single time point, with only one third using techniques such as pre-post comparisons, time trends, or comparisons to control groups. Ten domains of measures addressed reports of patient experience, all of which could be assessed by existing CAHPS instruments. Similarly, CAHPS measures are available to assess all of the organizational processes that are addressed by innovations in the profiles and for which patients are the best source of information. While 120 of the innovations that use patient experience measures report using surveys to collect these data, only 6 reported using a CAHPS measure.
CONCLUSIONS: Although innovations targeting quality improvement are often evaluated using surveys, there is considerable untapped potential for using CAHPS measures or surveys to assess their effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25252390     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40054-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  9 in total

1.  Usual Primary Care Provider Characteristics of a Patient-Centered Medical Home and Mental Health Service Use.

Authors:  Audrey L Jones; Susan D Cochran; Arleen Leibowitz; Kenneth B Wells; Gerald Kominski; Vickie M Mays
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient Experience with the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Michigan's Statewide Multi-Payer Demonstration: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Issidoros Sarinopoulos; Diane L Bechel-Marriott; Jean M Malouin; Shaohui Zhai; Jason C Forney; Clare L Tanner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Content and Actionability of Recommendations to Providers After Shadow Coaching.

Authors:  Denise D Quigley; Nabeel Qureshi; Alina Palimaru; Chau Pham; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 1.147

4.  Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care.

Authors:  Marisja Scheerhagen; Henk F van Stel; Dominique J C Tholhuijsen; Erwin Birnie; Arie Franx; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Measuring clients' experiences with antenatal care before or after childbirth: it matters.

Authors:  Marisja Scheerhagen; Erwin Birnie; Arie Franx; Henk F van Stel; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Does care in a specialised stroke prevention clinic improve poststroke blood pressure control: a protocol for a randomised comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Anjail Z Sharrief; Evelyn Hinojosa; Gail Cooksey; Munachi N Okpala; Elenir B Avritscher; Claudia Pedroza; Mary Carter Denny; Joshua Samuels; Jon E Tyson; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Findings From a Commercial ACO Patient Experience Survey.

Authors:  Joanne M Graham; David W Cowling; Hui Zhang
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-04-07

8.  Insurance Coverage, and Having a Regular Provider, and Utilization of Cancer Follow-up and Noncancer Health Care Among Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Michael R Cousineau; Sue E Kim; Ann S Hamilton; Kimberly A Miller; Joel Milam
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Using patient-reported measures to drive change in healthcare: the experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy.

Authors:  Sabina De Rosis; Domenico Cerasuolo; Sabina Nuti
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.