Literature DB >> 35169878

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication.

Hoover Wu1,2,3, Mikhail Attaar4,5, Harry J Wong4,5, Michelle Campbell4,5, Kristine Kuchta6, Woody Denham4, John Linn4, Michael B Ujiki4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) use during laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease is well described. However, there is a lack of data on FLIP measurements during magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA). This study aims to report our institutional experience in performing FLIP during MSA and to compare these measurements to those obtained during Nissen and Toupet fundoplication. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. Patients who underwent MSA or LF and had FLIP measurements between April 2018 and June 2021 were included. FLIP measurements at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) were recorded without pneumoperitoneum at 40 mL balloon fill after hernia reduction, cruroplasty, and MSA or fundoplication. Reflux symptom index (RSI), GERD-HRQL, and dysphagia score were collected up to 2 years. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ2 tests, with statistical significance of p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent MSA and 100 patients underwent LF (66% Toupet, 34% Nissen). Type III hiatal hernia was present in 3.7% of MSA patients versus over 50% for fundoplication patients. Minimum diameter, cross-sectional area, and distensibility index (DI) were lower after MSA device placement compared to Nissen or Toupet fundoplication (p < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up showed no differences in RSI, GERD-HRQL, and dysphagia score between MSA and Nissen fundoplication (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative impedance planimetry provided objective information regarding the geometry of the GEJ during MSA. The ring of magnetic beads restores the anti-reflux barrier and transiently opens with food bolus and belching. The magnetic force of the beads may explain why the DI after MSA is lower yet postoperative quality of life is no different than Nissen fundoplication.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EndoFLIP; GERD; Impedance planimetry; LINX; Nissen; Toupet

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35169878     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09128-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  21 in total

1.  Crural closure, not fundoplication, results in a significant decrease in lower esophageal sphincter distensibility.

Authors:  Mikhail Attaar; Bailey Su; Harry Wong; Zachary Callahan; Kristine Kuchta; Stephen Stearns; John G Linn; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Use of a magnetic sphincter for the treatment of GERD: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Robert A Ganz; Christopher J Gostout; Jerry Grudem; William Swanson; Todd Berg; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah J Switzer; Jerry Dang; Richdeep S Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Christopher de Gara; Daniel W Birch; Clarence Wong; Matthew M Hutter; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J C Lipham; P A Taiganides; B E Louie; R A Ganz; T R DeMeester
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Is that 'floppy' fundoplication tight enough?

Authors:  Brexton Turner; Melissa Helm; Emily Hetzel; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP).

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Ikuo Hirano; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication.

Authors:  Bailey Su; Stephanie Novak; Zachary M Callahan; Kristine Kuchta; JoAnn Carbray; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Use of Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) in Foregut Surgery Practice: Experience of More than 400 Cases.

Authors:  Bailey Su; Zachary M Callahan; Kristine Kuchta; John G Linn; Stephen P Haggerty; Woody Denham; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials to Compare Long-Term Outcomes of Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Zhi-chao Tian; Bin Wang; Cheng-xiang Shan; Wei Zhang; Dao-zhen Jiang; Ming Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.