Literature DB >> 3516949

Potential methods for predicting tumor radiocurability.

L J Peters, W A Brock, T Johnson, R E Meyn, P J Tofilon, L Milas.   

Abstract

Several predictors of tumor radiocurability are already integrated into clinical practice, for example, tumor size, gross morphology (that is, infiltrative or exophytic), histologic type and grade. These are nonspecific and relatively imprecise. The aim of research into predictive assays is not only to refine the discrimination of existing predictors, but also to suggest specific experimental approaches for overcoming tumor radioresistance in individual patients. Two broad categories of predictive assays can be defined: direct and indirect measurement of tumor cell survival and/or repair capability following irradiation, and measurement of cellular and extracellular parameters affecting radiosensitivity. The ongoing research at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital is overviewed to illustrate potential methods for predicting radiocurability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3516949     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90053-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Role of transfection and clonal selection in mediating radioresistance.

Authors:  F S Pardo; R G Bristow; A Taghian; A Ong; C Borek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Oxygen distributions partly explain the radiation response of human squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  P Okunieff; J de Bie; E P Dunphy; D J Terris; M Höckel
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1996-07

Review 3.  Programmed cell death and radioresistance.

Authors:  R E Meyn; L C Stephens; L Milas
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Comparison of the response of human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma in nude mice after hypofractionated-accelerated regimens and "curative" fractionation schedules.

Authors:  S Appold; M Baumann; C Petersen; K Horn; F Eichhorn
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Micronucleus formation in human tumour cells: lack of correlation with radiosensitivity.

Authors:  C Bush; T J McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Growth and radiosensitivity testing of human tumour cells using the adhesive tumour cell culture system.

Authors:  C S Parkins; G G Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations.

Authors:  M Fenech
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Competitive exclusion of clonal subpopulations in heterogeneous tumours after stromal injury.

Authors:  J T Leith; S Michelson; A S Glicksman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Assessment of the proliferative activity and radiosensitivity of human tumours using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Y Shibamoto; T Shibata; S Miyatake; Y Oda; T Manabe; G Ohshio; K Yagi; C Streffer; M Takahashi; M Abe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Radiation responses of subrenally transplanted syngeneic and allogeneic mouse fibrosarcomas.

Authors:  S Sato; A Ootsuyama; H Tanooka
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1988-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.