S Appold1, M Baumann, C Petersen, K Horn, F Eichhorn. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technischen Universität Dresden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that tumors respond differently after irradiation with 10 or more fractions than with less fractionated regimens and that extrapolation from experiments with only a few fractions to "curative" regimens may be invalid. To test this hypothesis, we compared hypofractionated-accelerated treatments with "curative" fractionation schedules in human squamous cell carcinoma in nude mice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: FaDu tumors were transplanted subcutaneously into the hindleg of NMRI nu/nu mice. TCD50 values, i.e., the dose necessary to control 50% of the tumors locally, were determined after irradiation under ambient blood flow conditions with 5 and 10 fractions in 5 days, 10 fractions in 10 days, and 30 fractions in 15 days, 6 weeks or 10 weeks. RESULTS: TCD50 values of the hypofractionated regimens were not significantly different and varied from 41 to 46 Gy. The number of fractions given in the same overall time had no measurable effect on local tumor control. The TCD50 after 30 fractions in 6 weeks was 30 Gy higher than after the hypofractionated regimens. This effect was caused by a substantial increase of TCD50 with overall treatment time, the dose recovered per day was 0.82 Gy (95% CI 0.66; 0.96). alpha/beta eff determined from all data was 58 Gy (13; infinite). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study compare well with our previous findings after different "curative" fractionation schedules in the same tumor. Thus, our study does not support that tumors respond differently after application of 10 or more fractions compared to less fractionated regimens. The biological mechanisms that govern the radiation response of FaDu tumors appear to be the same for hypofractionated-accelerated and "curative" regimens. Since only one tumor was investigated, these results cannot be generalized at the present time.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that tumors respond differently after irradiation with 10 or more fractions than with less fractionated regimens and that extrapolation from experiments with only a few fractions to "curative" regimens may be invalid. To test this hypothesis, we compared hypofractionated-accelerated treatments with "curative" fractionation schedules in humansquamous cell carcinoma in nude mice. MATERIAL AND METHODS:FaDu tumors were transplanted subcutaneously into the hindleg of NMRI nu/nu mice. TCD50 values, i.e., the dose necessary to control 50% of the tumors locally, were determined after irradiation under ambient blood flow conditions with 5 and 10 fractions in 5 days, 10 fractions in 10 days, and 30 fractions in 15 days, 6 weeks or 10 weeks. RESULTS: TCD50 values of the hypofractionated regimens were not significantly different and varied from 41 to 46 Gy. The number of fractions given in the same overall time had no measurable effect on local tumor control. The TCD50 after 30 fractions in 6 weeks was 30 Gy higher than after the hypofractionated regimens. This effect was caused by a substantial increase of TCD50 with overall treatment time, the dose recovered per day was 0.82 Gy (95% CI 0.66; 0.96). alpha/beta eff determined from all data was 58 Gy (13; infinite). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study compare well with our previous findings after different "curative" fractionation schedules in the same tumor. Thus, our study does not support that tumors respond differently after application of 10 or more fractions compared to less fractionated regimens. The biological mechanisms that govern the radiation response of FaDu tumors appear to be the same for hypofractionated-accelerated and "curative" regimens. Since only one tumor was investigated, these results cannot be generalized at the present time.