Amanda Mb Doty1, Kristin L Rising2, TingAnn Hsiao3, Grace Amadio4, Alexzandra T Gentsch3, Venise J Salcedo3, Ian McElwee3, Kenzie A Cameron5, David H Salzman6, Dimitrios Papanagnou4, Danielle M McCarthy7. 1. Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA. Electronic address: Amanda.Doty@jefferson.edu. 2. Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA. 3. Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA; Research Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA. 6. Department of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe how emergency medicine resident physicians discuss diagnostic uncertainty during a simulated ED discharge discussion. METHODS: A secondary content analysis of simulated clinical encounter audiotapes completed by emergency medicine residents across two sites. RESULTS: When discussing lack of diagnosis, residents explained the evaluation revealed no cause for symptoms, noted concerning diagnoses that were excluded, and acknowledged both symptoms and patients' feelings. Residents used explicit and implicit language to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with similar frequency. Almost half of the residents discussed the ED role as focused on emergent illness to give patients context for their uncertain diagnoses. However, 28% of residents in this study did not discuss diagnostic uncertainty in any form. All residents provided reassurance. CONCLUSION: Residents use a range of approaches to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with patients at the time of a simulated ED discharge, with some residents omitting discussion of uncertainty entirely. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings represent the current state of communication, which needs improvement. These findings do not immediately transfer to clinical practice recommendations, but rather support a need for both further study and development of formal communication training on this topic.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how emergency medicine resident physicians discuss diagnostic uncertainty during a simulated ED discharge discussion. METHODS: A secondary content analysis of simulated clinical encounter audiotapes completed by emergency medicine residents across two sites. RESULTS: When discussing lack of diagnosis, residents explained the evaluation revealed no cause for symptoms, noted concerning diagnoses that were excluded, and acknowledged both symptoms and patients' feelings. Residents used explicit and implicit language to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with similar frequency. Almost half of the residents discussed the ED role as focused on emergent illness to give patients context for their uncertain diagnoses. However, 28% of residents in this study did not discuss diagnostic uncertainty in any form. All residents provided reassurance. CONCLUSION: Residents use a range of approaches to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with patients at the time of a simulated ED discharge, with some residents omitting discussion of uncertainty entirely. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings represent the current state of communication, which needs improvement. These findings do not immediately transfer to clinical practice recommendations, but rather support a need for both further study and development of formal communication training on this topic.
Authors: Samuel Vaillancourt; M Bianca Seaton; Michael J Schull; Amy H Y Cheng; Dorcas E Beaton; Andreas Laupacis; Katie N Dainty Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kristin L Rising; Rhea E Powell; Kenzie A Cameron; David H Salzman; Dimitrios Papanagnou; Amanda M B Doty; Lori Latimer; Katherine Piserchia; William C McGaghie; Danielle M McCarthy Journal: Acad Med Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Danielle M McCarthy; Rhea E Powell; Kenzie A Cameron; David H Salzman; Dimitrios Papanagnou; Amanda Mb Doty; Benjamin E Leiby; Katherine Piserchia; Matthew R Klein; Xiao C Zhang; William C McGaghie; Kristin L Rising Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.463