| Literature DB >> 35168556 |
Chenggang Wang1,2,3, Mengyun Zhang1, Jiajie Zhou1, Xun Gao1, Shidong Zhu1,2,3, Lingyun Yuan1,2,3, Xilin Hou4, Tongkun Liu4, Guohu Chen1,2,3, Xiaoyan Tang1,2,3, Guolei Shan1,2, Jinfeng Hou5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wucai suffers from low temperature during the growth period, resulting in a decline in yield and poor quality. But the molecular mechanisms of cold tolerance in wucai are still unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica campestris; Cold stress; RNA-seq; α-linolenic acid metabolism
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35168556 PMCID: PMC8848729 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08311-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Measurement of plant physiological parameters in wucai seedlings at the 7-leaf stage subjected to 3-day cold stress. A: Phenotypic change under cold stress in six wucai genotypes, ws-1, ws-2, Sw-1, Sw-3, W18 and Ta2. B: MDA content under cold stress in six wucai genotypes. C: Relative electrical conductivity under cold stress in six wucai genotypes. D: PIabs under cold stress in six wucai genotypes. E: Vj under cold stress in six wucai genotypes. The data are presented as the mean ± SD of three replicates. Bars with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test)
Fig. 2Measurement of plant physiological parameters in wucai seedlings at the 7-leaf stage subjected to 24-h cold stress. A: Phenotypic change in W18 and Sw-1 under cold stress. B: Relative electrical conductivity in W18 and Sw-1 under control and cold stress conditions. C: MDA content in W18 and Sw-1 under control and cold stress conditions. D: H2O2 content in W18 and Sw-1 under control and cold stress conditions. E: O2·− generation rate in W18 and Sw-1 under control and cold stress conditions. F: T-AOC content in W18 and Sw-1 under control and cold stress conditions. G: PIabs in W18 and Sw-1 under control and cold stress conditions. The data are presented as the mean ± SD of three replicates. Bars with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test)
Fig. 3Analysis of DEGs in CT and CS. A: Number of DEGs in the pairwise group. The red indicates upregulated genes, while the blue indicates downregulated genes. B: Hierarchical clustering DEGs in CT (LT vs NT), each column represents a comparison group, and each row represents a gene
Fig. 4GO distribution of DEGs under 24-h cold stress in the two groups. The cold tolerance-related DEGs were based on GO categories that were grouped into three levels: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. the left y-axis shows the number of genes, and the x-axis indicates specific categories of genes
Fig. 5KEGG enrichment analysis with the 20 most enriched KEGG terms in CT (LT vs NT) (A) and CS (LT vs NT) (B). High and low P-values are represented by blue and red, respectively
Fig. 6DEGs relevant to the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway and carbohydrate content of the two wucai genotypes under cold stress. A: pathway diagram of starch and sucrose metabolism. B: The heat map of the expression of DEGs related to the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway in CT (LT vs NT) and CS (LT vs NT). C: Starch content of CT and CS under control and cold stress conditions. D: Sucrose content of CT and CS under control and cold stress conditions. E: Fructose content of CT and CS under control and cold stress conditions. F: Glucose content of CT and CS under control and cold stress conditions
Fig. 7DEGs relevant to the glutathione metabolism pathway and intermediate metabolites of the two wucai genotypes under cold stress. A: Pathway diagram of the glutathione metabolism. B: The heat map of the expression of DEGs related to glutathione metabolism pathway CT (LT vs NT) and CS (LT vs NT). C: GSH content under control and cold stress conditions. D: GSSG content under control and cold stress conditions. E: GSH/GSSG under control and cold stress conditions. F: Sum of the GSH and GSSG contents under control and cold stress conditions
Fig. 8DEGs relevant to the α-linolenic acid metabolism pathway and JA signal transduction pathway in CT (LT vs NT) and CS (LT vs NT). A: Pathway diagram of the α-Linolenic acid metabolism. B: Pathway diagram of jasmonic acid signal transduction. C: The heat map of the expression of DEGs related to α-Linolenic acid metabolism pathway and jasmonic acid signal transduction pathway. D: MeJA content of CT and CS under control and cold stress conditions
Fig. 9Statistical analysis of TFs under cold stress. A: Numbers of top 10 TF families in CT (LT vs NT) and CS (LT vs NT). B: The heatmap of TFs common to the two groups. C: The heatmap of TFs unique to CT (LT vs NT)
Fig. 10Validation of gene expression patterns in CT and CS under cold stress by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR analysis of 19 selected DEGs. Bars with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test)