Literature DB >> 35166601

In Vitro Analysis of Nasal Interface Options for High-Efficiency Aerosol Administration to Preterm Infants.

Connor Howe1, Mohammad A M Momin2, Karl Bass1, Ghali Aladwani1, Serena Bonasera2, Michael Hindle2, Philip Worth Longest1,2.   

Abstract

Background: An infant air-jet dry powder inhaler (DPI) platform has recently been developed that in combination with highly dispersible spray-dried powder formulations can achieve high-efficiency aerosolization with low actuation air volumes. The objective of this study was to investigate modifications to the nasal interface section of this platform to improve the aerosol delivery performance through preterm nose-throat (NT) models.
Methods: Aerosol delivery performance of multiple nasal interface flow pathways and prong configurations was assessed with two in vitro preterm infant NT models. Two excipient-enhanced growth (EEG) dry powder formulations were explored containing either l-leucine or trileucine as the dispersion enhancer. Performance metrics included aerosol depositional loss in the nasal interface, deposition in the NT models, and tracheal filter deposition, which was used to estimate lung delivery efficiency.
Results: The best performing nasal interface replaced the straight flexible prong of the original gradual expansion design with a rigid curved prong (∼20° curvature). The prong modification increased the lung delivery efficiency by 5%-10% (absolute difference) depending on the powder formulation. Adding a metal mesh to the flow pathway, to dissipate the turbulent jet, also improved lung delivery efficiency by ∼5%, while reducing the NT depositional loss by a factor of over twofold compared with the original nasal interface. The platform was also found to perform similarly in two different preterm NT models, with no statistically significant difference between any of the performance metrics. Conclusions: Modifications to the nasal interface of an infant air-jet DPI improved the aerosol delivery through multiple infant NT models, providing up to an additional 10% lung delivery efficiency (absolute difference) with the lead design delivering ∼57% of the loaded dose to the tracheal filter, while performance in two unique preterm airway geometries remained similar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air-jet DPI; high-dose DPI; infant DPI; nasal prong; nose-to-lung aerosol delivery; rapid aerosol administration; trans-nasal aerosol delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35166601      PMCID: PMC9416545          DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2021.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1941-2711            Impact factor:   3.440


  49 in total

1.  Efficiency of aerosol medication delivery from a metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  T F Fok; S Monkman; M Dolovich; S Gray; G Coates; B Paes; F Rashid; M Newhouse; H Kirpalani
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1996-05

Review 2.  Idealhalers Versus Realhalers: Is It Possible to Bypass Deposition in the Upper Respiratory Tract?

Authors:  Jeffry G Weers; Yoen-Ju Son; Mark Glusker; Alfred Haynes; Daniel Huang; Nani Kadrichu; John Le; Xue Li; Richard Malcolmson; Danforth P Miller; Thomas E Tarara; Keith Ung; Andy Clark
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.849

3.  In vitro tests for aerosol deposition II: IVIVCs for different dry powder inhalers in normal adults.

Authors:  Renishkumar Delvadia; Michael Hindle; P Worth Longest; Peter R Byron
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.849

4.  Targeting aerosol deposition to and within the lung airways using excipient enhanced growth.

Authors:  Geng Tian; P Worth Longest; Xiang Li; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.849

5.  Degree of throat deposition can explain the variability in lung deposition of inhaled drugs.

Authors:  Lars Borgström; Bo Olsson; Lars Thorsson
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2006

6.  High-Efficiency Nose-to-Lung Aerosol Delivery in an Infant: Development of a Validated Computational Fluid Dynamics Method.

Authors:  Karl Bass; Susan Boc; Michael Hindle; Kelley Dodson; Worth Longest
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.849

7.  Pulmonary deposition of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer in mechanically ventilated rabbits.

Authors:  T F Fok; M Al-Essa; S Monkman; M Dolovich; L Girard; G Coates; H Kirpalani
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Effects of condensate in the exhalation limb of neonatal circuits on airway pressure during bubble CPAP.

Authors:  Tiffany M Youngquist; C Peter Richardson; Robert M Diblasi
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.258

9.  Optimizing Aerosolization Using Computational Fluid Dynamics in a Pediatric Air-Jet Dry Powder Inhaler.

Authors:  Karl Bass; Dale Farkas; Worth Longest
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.246

10.  Performance of Low Air Volume Dry Powder Inhalers (LV-DPI) when Aerosolizing Excipient Enhanced Growth (EEG) Surfactant Powder Formulations.

Authors:  Susan Boc; Mohammad A M Momin; Dale R Farkas; Worth Longest; Michael Hindle
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.246

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development of a High-Dose Infant Air-Jet Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) with Passive Cyclic Loading of the Formulation.

Authors:  Connor Howe; Mohammad A M Momin; Ghali Aladwani; Michael Hindle; P Worth Longest
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 2.  Aerosol Delivery of Lung Surfactant and Nasal CPAP in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Frans J Walther; Alan J Waring
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  In Vitro Anatomical Models for Nasal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Gerallt Williams; Julie D Suman
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.525

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.