Literature DB >> 35165892

Bayes optimal informer sets for early-stage drug discovery.

Peng Yu1, Spencer Ericksen2, Anthony Gitter1,3, Michael A Newton1,2.   

Abstract

An important experimental design problem in early-stage drug discovery is how to prioritize available compounds for testing when very little is known about the target protein. Informer-based ranking (IBR) methods address the prioritization problem when the compounds have provided bioactivity data on other potentially relevant targets. An IBR method selects an informer set of compounds, and then prioritizes the remaining compounds on the basis of new bioactivity experiments performed with the informer set on the target. We formalize the problem as a two-stage decision problem and introduce the Bayes Optimal Informer SEt (BOISE) method for its solution. BOISE leverages a flexible model of the initial bioactivity data, a relevant loss function, and effective computational schemes to resolve the two-step design problem. We evaluate BOISE and compare it to other IBR strategies in two retrospective studies, one on protein-kinase inhibition and the other on anticancer drug sensitivity. In both empirical settings BOISE exhibits better predictive performance than available methods. It also behaves well with missing data, where methods that use matrix completion show worse predictive performance.
© 2022 The Authors. Biometrics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes decision rule; Dirichlet process mixture model; experimental design; high-throughput screening; matrix completion; ranking

Year:  2022        PMID: 35165892      PMCID: PMC9376199          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   1.701


  10 in total

Review 1.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: Into the Great Wide Open.

Authors:  Jürgen Bajorath; Steven Kearnes; W Patrick Walters; Nicholas A Meanwell; Gunda I Georg; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Bayesian clinical trials.

Authors:  Donald A Berry
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.

Authors:  Stefano Forli; Ruth Huey; Michael E Pique; Michel F Sanner; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  The Use of Informer Sets in Screening: Perspectives on an Efficient Strategy to Identify New Probes.

Authors:  Paul A Clemons; Joshua A Bittker; Florence F Wagner; Allison Hands; Vlado Dančík; Stuart L Schreiber; Amit Choudhary; Bridget K Wagner
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.341

6.  Practical Model Selection for Prospective Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Shengchao Liu; Moayad Alnammi; Spencer S Ericksen; Andrew F Voter; Gene E Ananiev; James L Keck; F Michael Hoffmann; Scott A Wildman; Anthony Gitter
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells.

Authors:  Wanjuan Yang; Jorge Soares; Patricia Greninger; Elena J Edelman; Howard Lightfoot; Simon Forbes; Nidhi Bindal; Dave Beare; James A Smith; I Richard Thompson; Sridhar Ramaswamy; P Andrew Futreal; Daniel A Haber; Michael R Stratton; Cyril Benes; Ultan McDermott; Mathew J Garnett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Seeding collaborations to advance kinase science with the GSK Published Kinase Inhibitor Set (PKIS).

Authors:  David H Drewry; Timothy M Willson; William J Zuercher
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  PubChem 2019 update: improved access to chemical data.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim; Jie Chen; Tiejun Cheng; Asta Gindulyte; Jia He; Siqian He; Qingliang Li; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Paul A Thiessen; Bo Yu; Leonid Zaslavsky; Jian Zhang; Evan E Bolton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets.

Authors:  Huikun Zhang; Spencer S Ericksen; Ching-Pei Lee; Gene E Ananiev; Nathan Wlodarchak; Peng Yu; Julie C Mitchell; Anthony Gitter; Stephen J Wright; F Michael Hoffmann; Scott A Wildman; Michael A Newton
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.