Literature DB >> 16485344

Bayesian clinical trials.

Donald A Berry1.   

Abstract

Bayesian statistical methods are being used increasingly in clinical research because the Bayesian approach is ideally suited to adapting to information that accrues during a trial, potentially allowing for smaller more informative trials and for patients to receive better treatment. Accumulating results can be assessed at any time, including continually, with the possibility of modifying the design of the trial, for example, by slowing (or stopping) or expanding accrual, imbalancing randomization to favour better-performing therapies, dropping or adding treatment arms, and changing the trial population to focus on patient subsets that are responding better to the experimental therapies. Bayesian analyses use available patient-outcome information, including biomarkers that accumulating data indicate might be related to clinical outcome. They also allow for the use of historical information and for synthesizing results of relevant trials. Here, I explain the rationale underlying Bayesian clinical trials, and discuss the potential of such trials to improve the effectiveness of drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16485344     DOI: 10.1038/nrd1927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov        ISSN: 1474-1776            Impact factor:   84.694


  180 in total

1.  NCCN Working Group report: designing clinical trials in the era of multiple biomarkers and targeted therapies.

Authors:  Alan P Venook; Maria E Arcila; Al B Benson; Donald A Berry; David Ross Camidge; Robert W Carlson; Toni K Choueiri; Valerie Guild; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Razelle Kurzrock; Christine M Lovly; Amy E McKee; Robert J Morgan; Anthony J Olszanski; Mary W Redman; Vered Stearns; Joan McClure; Marian L Birkeland
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Early changes in clinical characteristics after emergency department therapy for acute heart failure syndromes: identifying patients who do not respond to standard therapy.

Authors:  Sean P Collins; Christopher J Lindsell; Alan B Storrow; Gregory J Fermann; Phillip D Levy; Peter S Pang; Neal Weintraub; W Frank Peacock; Douglas B Sawyer; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Shortcomings in the clinical evaluation of new drugs: acute myeloid leukemia as paradigm.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Frederick R Appelbaum; Martin S Tallman; Noel S Weiss; Richard A Larson; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Integrating predictive biomarkers and classifiers into oncology clinical development programmes.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman; Jason Clark; Cong Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Elacytarabine has single-agent activity in patients with advanced acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Susan O'Brien; David A Rizzieri; Norbert Vey; Farhad Ravandi; Utz O Krug; Mikkael A Sekeres; Mike Dennis; Adriano Venditti; Donald A Berry; Tove Flem Jacobsen; Karin Staudacher; Trygve Bergeland; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Bayesian adaptive randomized trial design for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Lorenzo Trippa; Eudocia Q Lee; Patrick Y Wen; Tracy T Batchelor; Timothy Cloughesy; Giovanni Parmigiani; Brian M Alexander
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival of patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a Bayesian model averaging approach.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Won Kang; Koon Ho Rha; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Jerome Cornfield's Bayesian approach to assessing interim results in clinical trials.

Authors:  James J Schlesselman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  A Tutorial on Adaptive Design Optimization.

Authors:  Jay I Myung; Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  Bayesian approach to estimate AUC, partition coefficient and drug targeting index for studies with serial sacrifice design.

Authors:  Tianli Wang; Kyle Baron; Wei Zhong; Richard Brundage; William Elmquist
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.