Literature DB >> 35165421

Rapid development of an updated mRNA vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

Na-Na Zhang1,2, Rong-Rong Zhang1, Yi-Fei Zhang1,3, Kai Ji4, Xiao-Chuan Xiong1,5, Qian-Shan Qin4, Peng Gao4, Xi-Shan Lu4, Hang-Yu Zhou6, Hai-Feng Song4, Bo Ying7, Cheng-Feng Qin8,9.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35165421      PMCID: PMC8853430          DOI: 10.1038/s41422-022-00626-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   46.297


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Since the declaration of public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the WHO, the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to over 300 million confirmed cases with more than 5 million deaths in the past 2 years. On top of that, SARS-CoV-2 continues evolving into many variants, and many of these variants with evidence to enhance viral transmissibility, adaptiveness, infectivity, and/or to escape from host immune response are classified as variants of concerns (VOC).[1] Since the outbreak of the pandemic, five VOCs, including Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron have been verified by the WHO. The newest SARS-CoV-2 VOC, Omicron (also known as B.1.1.529) designated by WHO was first reported in South Africa in November 2021. In a few weeks, Omicron has thrived throughout the world and became the predominantly circulating strain in most continents. Remarkably, Omicron carries an unprecedented number of mutations/deletions/insertion (over 30) in the spike (S) protein as well as the receptor binding domain (RBD), the main target of the host immune responses and vaccine development. Many of these mutations, e.g., K417Y, E484A, N501Y, D614G, P681H, have been identified in other VOCs and are predicted to affect neutralization epitopes.[2,3] Indeed, accumulated evidence has demonstrated that the Omicron variant can largely escape from vaccination, convalescent sera and most approved monoclonal antibodies.[4,5] For example, the most potent mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 from Pfizer-BioNTech and mRNA-1273 from Moderna, also showed significant reduction in neutralization antibody titers against the Omicron variant.[6-8] Previously, we have developed a Lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated mRNA vaccine ARCoV,[9] which is at the final stage of a multi-regional phase 3 clinical trial (NCT04847102). Distinct from BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, the two full-length S proteins-based mRNA vaccines, ARCoV encodes the RBD of the wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 S protein. As there are 15 variant mutations in Omicron RBD (Fig. 1a), it is interesting to assess the neutralizing activity of serum samples from vaccinees of ARCoV against the Omicron variant. To do so, a panel of serum samples (n = 11) from participants in the phase 1 clinical trial[10] were analyzed for their neutralizing Ab titers using VSV-based pseudovirus. All samples were collected on day 14 post two-dose immunization with 15 µg of ARCoV. As shown in Fig. 1b, most samples (8/11, 72.7%) retained low but detectable neutralization activity against Omicron, with a 47-fold reduction in geometric mean titers (GMTs) against Omicron compared to the WT strain (GMT 1440.87 to 30.67). This observation is consistent with other studies with convalescent or vaccinee sera,[5-8] suggesting the immune escape capability of Omicron.
Fig. 1

Development and characterization of an updated RBD-based mRNA vaccine against Omicron.

a Structural model of amino acid mutations in the Spike protein of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. The model was built using SWISS-MODEL[15] with a structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (PDB: 6 ZGE[16]) as the template model and visualized with PyMOL(v2.5.0). The RBD, NTD, and S2 region of Spike protein were colored by red, blue and green, respectively. All mutations in the RBD were highlighted in darker color, and mutations or deletions in other region of Spike protein were colored in gray. b The 50% neutralization titer of sera from ARCoV vaccinees (n = 11) were analyzed using VSV-based pseudovirus for WT and Omicron, respectively. The red dashed lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using unpaired t-test (***P < 0.001). c Neutralization assay after a booster ARCoV vaccination in mice. Groups of 8–9-month female BALB/c mice were intramuscularly immunized and boosted with 10 μg ARCoV (n = 3), and sera were detected at the indicated time points. The red dashed lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (n.s., not significant). d Schematic representation of the mRNA construct encoding Omicron RBD. The mutation sites were indicated with red lines. e Omicron RBD protein expression from mRNA in Huh-7 cells. Cells were transfected with Omicron RBD-encoding mRNAs, and the supernatants was detected by Western blotting assay 24 h after transfection. f In vivo expression of ARCoV-Omicron in mice. Groups of 6–8-week female ICR mice (n = 5) were intravenously inoculated with ARCoV-Omicron, and PBS (n = 4) was used as Placebo. The serum concentration of Omicron RBD was measured by ELISA. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (n.s., not significant; ***P < 0.001). g, h The immunogenicity of ARCoV-Omicron in mice. Groups of 6–8-week female ICR mice (n = 5) were immunized intramuscularly with two doses of 10 μg of ARCoV-Omicron at 7-day interval. Sera were collected at 14 days after initial immunization and subjected to IgG and neutralization antibody assays. The red dashed lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). i Timeline for the rapid development of ARCoV-Omicron mRNA vaccine.

Development and characterization of an updated RBD-based mRNA vaccine against Omicron.

a Structural model of amino acid mutations in the Spike protein of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. The model was built using SWISS-MODEL[15] with a structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (PDB: 6 ZGE[16]) as the template model and visualized with PyMOL(v2.5.0). The RBD, NTD, and S2 region of Spike protein were colored by red, blue and green, respectively. All mutations in the RBD were highlighted in darker color, and mutations or deletions in other region of Spike protein were colored in gray. b The 50% neutralization titer of sera from ARCoV vaccinees (n = 11) were analyzed using VSV-based pseudovirus for WT and Omicron, respectively. The red dashed lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using unpaired t-test (***P < 0.001). c Neutralization assay after a booster ARCoV vaccination in mice. Groups of 8–9-month female BALB/c mice were intramuscularly immunized and boosted with 10 μg ARCoV (n = 3), and sera were detected at the indicated time points. The red dashed lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (n.s., not significant). d Schematic representation of the mRNA construct encoding Omicron RBD. The mutation sites were indicated with red lines. e Omicron RBD protein expression from mRNA in Huh-7 cells. Cells were transfected with Omicron RBD-encoding mRNAs, and the supernatants was detected by Western blotting assay 24 h after transfection. f In vivo expression of ARCoV-Omicron in mice. Groups of 6–8-week female ICR mice (n = 5) were intravenously inoculated with ARCoV-Omicron, and PBS (n = 4) was used as Placebo. The serum concentration of Omicron RBD was measured by ELISA. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (n.s., not significant; ***P < 0.001). g, h The immunogenicity of ARCoV-Omicron in mice. Groups of 6–8-week female ICR mice (n = 5) were immunized intramuscularly with two doses of 10 μg of ARCoV-Omicron at 7-day interval. Sera were collected at 14 days after initial immunization and subjected to IgG and neutralization antibody assays. The red dashed lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Data are shown as means ± SEM and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). i Timeline for the rapid development of ARCoV-Omicron mRNA vaccine. A third dose of mRNA vaccination (booster) has been widely used and well evidenced to induce more robust antibody response and improve vaccine efficacy against VOCs.[11-13] To make sure the potential impact of a homologous booster of ARCoV, groups of 8–9-month female BALB/c mice that have received two doses of ARCoV were further boosted with a third dose ARCoV at day 300 post prime immunization (Fig. 1c). Remarkably, a booster immunization readily induced the production of neutralization antibody, and the GMTs against WT and Omicron increased to 28387.66 and 17206.32, respectively. Interestingly, only 1.65-fold reduction in GMTs against WT and Omicron was observed, and the difference is not statistically significant (Fig. 1c). This result highlights the invaluable benefits of a homologous booster vaccination and supports further validation in clinical trials. Considering the reduced neutralizing activities of sera from ARCoV vaccinees against Omicron variant, a new mRNA vaccine that directly targets the Omicron RBD will be critical. We therefore took an immediate action to start the effort of developing an Omicron mRNA vaccine based on our established LNP-mRNA vaccine platform. Briefly, the mRNAs encoding the Omicron RBD (Fig. 1d) were prepared and processed into the final LNP formulation as previously described.[9] The most potent two mRNA constructs, named Omicron/1 and Omicron/2, were selected from a total of 18 mRNAs with different untranslated regions (UTRs) and codon optimizations based on their in vitro expression levels detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Supplementary information, Fig. S1). Western blotting results demonstrated that recombinant Omicron RBD proteins were expressed and secreted in the supernatants of Huh-7 cells transfected with both mRNAs (Fig. 1e). Immunofluorescence staining results further confirmed that both RBD proteins could be recognized by an Omicron RBD-reactive monoclonal antibody (Supplementary information, Fig. S2). Upon intravenous injection, both LNP-formulated mRNAs, ARCoV-Omicrons, are potent in producing Omicron RBDs in mouse sera (Fig. 1f). After two doses of intramuscularly immunizations at 7-day interval, robust IgG antibodies as well as neutralization antibodies were readily induced by the two ARCoV-Omicrons (Fig. 1g, h) at 14 days post initial immunization. The antibody titers induced by ARCoV-Omicrons were comparable to the original mRNA vaccine ARCoV. It should be mentioned that a 0,7-immunization schedule was utilized in this study to accelerate research and development process, and a more robust antibody response can be expected with a regular 0,14-immunization schedule. The final clinical grade mRNA vaccine is currently being manufactured in a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) factory. Overall, our data presented here clearly demonstrate that a third dose of ARCoV would probably lead to a sharp increasement in neutralization antibodies not only against the WT SARS-CoV-2 but also the newly Omicron variant. Homologous booster vaccination with ARCoV represents a rational strategy in response to the Omicron emergency. More importantly, the continuously evolving SARS-CoV-2 calls for the most flexible and deployable mRNA vaccine platform. Starting from the Omicron RBD sequence, it took 32 days to obtain the first set of immunogenicity results from animal studies (Fig. 1i), and clinical grade vaccine will be ready in less than 3 weeks. As ARCoV-Omicron was produced under the same procedure and release specification as its original version ARCoV,[14] ARCoV-Omicron can be stored at refrigerator temperature for at least 6 months. To our knowledge, this is the first mRNA vaccine candidate against the Omicron variant that has been validated in animals. We are approaching to clinical trials to test the safety and efficacy of ARCoV-Omicron. Supplementary Methods Supplementary information, Fig. S1 Supplementary information, Fig. S2
  9 in total

1.  Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization.

Authors:  Timothée Bruel; Etienne Simon-Lorière; Felix A Rey; Olivier Schwartz; Delphine Planas; David Veyer; Artem Baidaliuk; Isabelle Staropoli; Florence Guivel-Benhassine; Maaran Michael Rajah; Cyril Planchais; Françoise Porrot; Nicolas Robillard; Julien Puech; Matthieu Prot; Floriane Gallais; Pierre Gantner; Aurélie Velay; Julien Le Guen; Najiby Kassis-Chikhani; Dhiaeddine Edriss; Laurent Belec; Aymeric Seve; Laura Courtellemont; Hélène Péré; Laurent Hocqueloux; Samira Fafi-Kremer; Thierry Prazuck; Hugo Mouquet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes.

Authors:  Andrew Waterhouse; Martino Bertoni; Stefan Bienert; Gabriel Studer; Gerardo Tauriello; Rafal Gumienny; Florian T Heer; Tjaart A P de Beer; Christine Rempfer; Lorenza Bordoli; Rosalba Lepore; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  The variant gambit: COVID-19's next move.

Authors:  Jessica A Plante; Brooke M Mitchell; Kenneth S Plante; Kari Debbink; Scott C Weaver; Vineet D Menachery
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 31.316

4.  Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.

Authors:  Gui-Ling Chen; Xiao-Feng Li; Xia-Hong Dai; Nan Li; Meng-Li Cheng; Zhen Huang; Jian Shen; Yu-Hua Ge; Zhen-Wei Shen; Yong-Qiang Deng; Shu-Yuan Yang; Hui Zhao; Na-Na Zhang; Yi-Fei Zhang; Ling Wei; Kai-Qi Wu; Meng-Fei Zhu; Cong-Gao Peng; Qi Jiang; Shou-Chun Cao; Yu-Hua Li; Dan-Hua Zhao; Xiao-Hong Wu; Ling Ni; Hua-Hao Shen; Chen Dong; Bo Ying; Guo-Ping Sheng; Cheng-Feng Qin; Hai-Nv Gao; Lan-Juan Li
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2022-01-24

5.  Recombinant protein subunit vaccine booster following two-dose inactivated vaccines dramatically enhanced anti-RBD responses and neutralizing titers against SARS-CoV-2 and Variants of Concern.

Authors:  Jingwen Ai; Haocheng Zhang; Qiran Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ke Lin; Zhangfan Fu; Jieyu Song; Yuanhan Zhao; Mingxiang Fan; Hongyu Wang; Chao Qiu; Yang Zhou; Wenhong Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 25.617

6.  SARS-CoV-2 and bat RaTG13 spike glycoprotein structures inform on virus evolution and furin-cleavage effects.

Authors:  Antoni G Wrobel; Donald J Benton; Pengqi Xu; Chloë Roustan; Stephen R Martin; Peter B Rosenthal; John J Skehel; Steven J Gamblin
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  A Thermostable mRNA Vaccine against COVID-19.

Authors:  Na-Na Zhang; Xiao-Feng Li; Yong-Qiang Deng; Hui Zhao; Yi-Jiao Huang; Guan Yang; Wei-Jin Huang; Peng Gao; Chao Zhou; Rong-Rong Zhang; Yan Guo; Shi-Hui Sun; Hang Fan; Shu-Long Zu; Qi Chen; Qi He; Tian-Shu Cao; Xing-Yao Huang; Hong-Ying Qiu; Jian-Hui Nie; Yuhang Jiang; Hua-Yuan Yan; Qing Ye; Xia Zhong; Xia-Lin Xue; Zhen-Yu Zha; Dongsheng Zhou; Xiao Yang; You-Chun Wang; Bo Ying; Cheng-Feng Qin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Effectiveness of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine.

Authors:  Yaki Saciuk; Jennifer Kertes; Naama Shamir Stein; Anat Ekka Zohar
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Long-term stability and protection efficacy of the RBD-targeting COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Tie-Cheng Wang; Xiao-Feng Li; Na-Na Zhang; Liang Li; Chao Zhou; Yong-Qiang Deng; Tian-Shu Cao; Guan Yang; Rui-Ting Li; Yi-Jiao Huang; Yuan-Guo Li; Yi-Ming Zhang; Fang-Xu Li; Yu-Ren Zhou; Yu-Hang Jiang; Xi-Shan Lu; Shi-Hui Sun; Meng-Li Cheng; Kai-Ping Gu; Mei Zhang; Qing-Qing Ma; Xiao Yang; Bo Ying; Yu-Wei Gao; Cheng-Feng Qin
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-12-24
  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of the novel omicron receptor AXL in cancers.

Authors:  Wei-Na Zhang; Xue-Ping Li; Peng-Fei Wang; Lu Zhu; Xin-Hua Xiao; Yu-Jun Dai
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.155

2.  SARS-CoV-2 Spike mutations modify the interaction between virus Spike and human ACE2 receptors.

Authors:  Pushpendra Mani Mishra; Farhan Anjum; Vladimir N Uversky; Chayan Kanti Nandi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.322

3.  Omicron-specific mRNA vaccination alone and as a heterologous booster against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Zhenhao Fang; Lei Peng; Renata Filler; Kazushi Suzuki; Andrew McNamara; Qianqian Lin; Paul A Renauer; Luojia Yang; Bridget Menasche; Angie Sanchez; Ping Ren; Qiancheng Xiong; Madison Strine; Paul Clark; Chenxiang Lin; Albert I Ko; Nathan D Grubaugh; Craig B Wilen; Sidi Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  In-Person Schooling Amidst Children's COVID-19 Vaccination: Exploring Parental Perceptions Just after Omicron Variant Announcement.

Authors:  Fadi Aljamaan; Ali Alhaboob; Basema Saddik; Rolan Bassrawi; Rasha Assiri; Elshazaly Saeed; Khalid Alhasan; Shuliweeh Alenezi; Mohammed Alarabi; Abdulkarim Alrabiaah; Yazed Alkriadees; Nora Al-Saud; Badi Alenazi; Ali A Rabaan; Rabih Halwani; Fahad AlZamil; Mazin Barry; Ziad A Memish; Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Mohamad-Hani Temsah
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  mRNA based vaccines provide broad protection against different SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Authors:  Haomeng Wang; Zhao Chen; Zhenghua Wang; Jin Li; Zhihong Yan; Jinbo Yuan; Airu Zhu; Lan Chen; Ye Liu; Chenlong Hu; Ali Zhu; Guowei Li; Yuehu Li; Jie Deng; Liqiao Ma; Xiuwen Sui; Wei Miao; Junqiang Li; Xiuyu Zheng; Jinhua Piao; Yanfeng Yao; Juhong Rao; Chao Shan; Zhiming Yuan; Jincun Zhao; Tao Zhu
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 19.568

Review 6.  SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: Immune escape and vaccine development.

Authors:  Danyi Ao; Tianxia Lan; Xuemei He; Jian Liu; Li Chen; Daniel T Baptista-Hon; Kang Zhang; Xiawei Wei
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-03-16

7.  Omicron-specific mRNA vaccination alone and as a heterologous booster against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Zhenhao Fang; Lei Peng; Renata Filler; Kazushi Suzuki; Andrew McNamara; Qianqian Lin; Paul A Renauer; Luojia Yang; Bridget Menasche; Angie Sanchez; Ping Ren; Qiancheng Xiong; Madison Strine; Paul Clark; Chenxiang Lin; Albert I Ko; Nathan D Grubaugh; Craig B Wilen; Sidi Chen
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2022-02-28

8.  Antigenicity comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages with other variants contained multiple mutations in RBD.

Authors:  Qianqian Li; Mengyi Zhang; Ziteng Liang; Li Zhang; Xi Wu; Chaoying Yang; Yimeng An; Jincheng Tong; Shuo Liu; Tao Li; Qianqian Cui; Jianhui Nie; Jiajing Wu; Weijin Huang; Youchun Wang
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-04-09

Review 9.  Nanoparticles in clinical trials of COVID-19: An update.

Authors:  Abdur Rauf; Tareq Abu-Izneid; Anees Ahmed Khalil; Nabia Hafeez; Ahmed Olatunde; Mominur Rahman; Prabhakar Semwal; Yahya Saleh Al-Awthan; Omar Salem Bahattab; Ishaq N Khan; Muhammad Arslan Khan; Rohit Sharma
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 13.400

10.  An updated RBD-Fc fusion vaccine booster increases neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants.

Authors:  Deyan Luo; Xiaolan Yang; Tao Li; Nianzhi Ning; Song Jin; Zhuangzhuang Shi; Hongjing Gu; Deyu Li; Yuwei Gao; Hui Wang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.