| Literature DB >> 35164321 |
Xiangna Chang1, Xuefeng Chen1, Yuxi Guo1, Pin Gong1, Shuya Pei1, Danni Wang1, Peipei Wang1, Mengrao Wang1, Fuxin Chen2.
Abstract
Astragali Radix (AR) is one of the well-known traditional Chinese medicines with a long history of medical use and a wide range of clinical applications. AR contains a variety of chemical constituents which can be classified into the following categories: polysaccharides, saponins, flavonoids, amino acids, and trace elements. There are several techniques to extract these constituents, of which microwave-assisted, enzymatic, aqueous, ultrasonic and reflux extraction are the most used. Several methods such as spectroscopy, capillary electrophoresis and various chromatographic methods have been developed to identify and analyze AR. Meanwhile, this paper also summarizes the biological activities of AR, such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antitumor and antiviral activities. It is expected to provide theoretical support for the better development and utilization of AR.Entities:
Keywords: Astragali Radix; analytical methods; biological activity; chemical constituents; extraction technologies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35164321 PMCID: PMC8839891 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27031058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1A. membranaceus and A. var. mongholicu and their commercial application.
Information regarding the polysaccharides identified from AR.
| No. | Name | Molecular Weight (Da) | Identification Method | Classification | Structure | Source | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AG-1 | - | 400 M NMR | Glucan | - |
| [ |
| 2 | AG-2 | - | 400 M NMR | Glucan | - |
| [ |
| 3 | AH-1 | - | 400 M NMR | Heteropolysaccharide | - |
| [ |
| 4 | AH-2 | - | 400 M NMR | Heteropolysaccharide | - |
| [ |
| 5 | APS-I | 1.7 × 106 | HPLC (C18), TLC | Heteropolysaccharide | - |
| [ |
| 6 | APS-II | 1.2 × 106 | HPLC (C18), TLC | D-Glucan | Dextran bonded mainly with-(1 → 4)- |
| [ |
| 7 | APS-III | 3.5 × 104 | 400 M NMR | D-Glucan | Dextran bonded mainly with -(1 → 4)- |
| [ |
Figure 2Chemical structures of major saponins identified from AR.
Detailed information of major saponins identified from AR.
| No. | Compound Name | Molecular Formula | Molecular Weight | ESI–MS | APCI–MS | Source | Refs. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent Ion ( | Fragment Ion ( | Parent Ion ( | Fragment Ion ( | ||||||
| 1 | Astragaloside I | C45H72O16 | 869.04 | - | - | 867.7 [M − H]− | 807.5 [M − H-Ac]− |
| [ |
| 2 | Isoastragaloside I | C45H72O16 | 869.04 | - | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 3 | Acetylastragaloside I | C47H74O17 | 911.08 | - | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 4 | Astragaloside II | C43H70O15 | 827.00 | - | - | 825.7 [M − H]− | 765.5 [M − H-Ac]− |
| [ |
| 5 | Isoastragaloside II | C43H70O15 | 827.00 | - | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 6 | Astragaloside IV | C41H68O14 | 784.97 | - | - | 783.7 [M − H]− | 651.4 [M − H−(Xyl-H2O)]− |
| [ |
| 7 | Astragaloside IV isomer/III | C41H68O14 | 784.97 | - | - | 783.7 [M − H]− | 651.7 [M − H-(Xyl-H2O)]− |
| [ |
| 8,9,10 | Astragaloside V/VI/VII | C47H78O19 | 947.11 | - | - | 945.6 [M − H]− | 783.6 [M − H-(Glu-H2O)]− |
| [ |
| 11 | Soyasaponin II | C47H76O17 | 913.10 | 914 | 457.4 | - | - |
| [ |
| 12 | Soyasaponin I | C48H78O18 | 943.12 | 944 | 617.4 | - | - |
| [ |
| 13 | Agroastragaloside III | C51H82O21 | 1031.18 | - | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 14 | Agroastragaloside IV | C49H80O20 | 989.14 | - | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 15 | Agroastragaloside I | C45H74O16 | 871.06 | - | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 16 | Alexandroside | C36H62O10 | 654.87 | - | - | - | - |
| [ |
Figure 3Chemical structures of major flavonoids.
Detailed information of major flavonoids identified from AR.
| No. | Compounds Name | Molecular Formula | Molecular Weight | ESI–MS | APCI–MS | Source | Refs. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent Ion ( | Fragment Ion ( | Parent Ion ( | Fragment Ion ( | ||||||
| 1 | Formononetin | C16H12O4 | 268.27 | 269 | 254 | - | - | both | [ |
| 2 | Ononin | C22H22O9 | 430.40 | 431 | 269 | - | - | both | [ |
| 3 | Calycosin | C16H12O5 | 284.26 | 285 | 275 | - | - | both | [ |
| 4 | formononetin-7- | C24H24O10 | 472.44 | - | - | 473 | 269 | both | [ |
| 5 | Formononetin-7- | C25H24O12 | 516.45 | 517 | 269 | - | - |
| [ |
| 6 | Calycosin-7- | C22H22O10 | 446.40 | 447 | 285 | - | - | both | [ |
| 7 | Calycosin-7- | C25H24O13 | 532.45 | 533 | 285 | - | - |
| [ |
| 8 | Calycosin-7- | C24H24O11 | 488.44 | - | - | 489 | 285 | both | [ |
| 9 | Pratensein | C16H12O6 | 300.26 | - | - | 301 | 269 | both | [ |
| 10 | Pratensein-7- | C22H22O11 | 462.40 | - | - | 463 | 301 | both | [ |
| 11 | Biochanin-A | C16H12O5 | 284.30 | - | - | 285 | - |
| [ |
| 12 | (3R)-7,2′-Dihydroxy-3′,4′-dimethoxyisoflavan | C17H18O5 | 302.32 | - | - | 303 | 167 | both | [ |
| 13 | (6a,llaR)-3-Hydroxy-9,10-Dimethoxypterocarpan | C17H16O5 | 300.31 | 301 | 152 | - | - |
| [ |
| 14 | (6a,llaR)-3-Hydroxy-9,10-Dimethoxypterocarpan-3- | C23H26O10 | 462.15 | 463 | 301 | - | - |
| [ |
| 15 | Astraisoflavanglucoside-6”- | C26H30O13 | 550 | 551 | 303 | - | - |
| [ |
| 16 | Wogonin | C16H12O5 | 284.27 | 285.1 | 270.2 | - | - |
| [ |
| 17 | 3-Hydroxyflavanone | C15H12O3 | 240.25 | 241 | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 18 | Medicarpin | C16H14O4 | 270.28 | 271 | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 19 | Isorhamnetin | C16H12O7 | 316.26 | 317 | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 20 | Mangiferin | C19H18O11 | 422.34 | 423 | - | - | - |
| [ |
| 21 | Naringin | C27H32O14 | 580.53 | 603 | - | - | - |
| [ |
Figure 4Chemical structures of the other 10 active components identified from AR.
Advantages and disadvantages of extraction methods for AR studies.
| Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|
| Water extraction | Simple operation and low production costs (maximal extraction rate of AP was 16.32%) | Large energy consumption and low extraction rate |
| Ethanol Reflux extraction | Wide range of applications, simple equipment, good extraction effect | Long extraction time, solvent residue |
| Microwave-assisted Extraction | Penetrating heating, time saving, high efficiency, energy saving (maximal extraction rate of AP was 32%, 49% improvement compared to conventional water extraction) | Volatile components gradually dissipate as the extraction time increases. |
| Ultrasonic extraction | Simple operation, high efficiency, time saving and energy saving (maximal extraction rate of AP was 30.28%, 46.23% improvement compared to conventional water extraction) | Sound pollution |
| Enzyme extraction | High specificity and efficiency (maximal extraction rate of AP was 29.96%, 45.52% improvement compared to conventional water extraction) | High production costs |
Figure 5Biological activities of AR.
Figure 6The anti-inflammatory activity mechanism of AR in cell and animal models.
Figure 7The antioxidant activity mechanism of AR in cell and animal models.
Figure 8Several mechanisms linking AR treatment of cancer. Arrows and bar-headed lines represent signaling activation and inhibition, respectively [53].