| Literature DB >> 35163587 |
Katerina Honkova1, Andrea Rossnerova1, Irena Chvojkova1, Alena Milcova1, Hasmik Margaryan1, Anna Pastorkova2, Antonin Ambroz2, Pavel Rossner2, Vitezslav Jirik3, Jiri Rubes4, Radim J Sram1, Jan Topinka1.
Abstract
DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mechanism that regulates gene expression, and it can serve as a useful biomarker of prior environmental exposure and future health outcomes. This study focused on DNA methylation profiles in a human cohort, comprising 125 nonsmoking city policemen (sampled twice), living and working in three localities (Prague, Ostrava and Ceske Budejovice) of the Czech Republic, who spent the majority of their working time outdoors. The main characterization of the localities, differing by major sources of air pollution, was defined by the stationary air pollution monitoring of PM2.5, B[a]P and NO2. DNA methylation was analyzed by a genome-wide microarray method. No season-specific DNA methylation pattern was discovered; however, we identified 13,643 differentially methylated CpG loci (DML) for a comparison between the Prague and Ostrava groups. The most significant DML was cg10123377 (log2FC = -1.92, p = 8.30 × 10-4) and loci annotated to RPTOR (total 20 CpG loci). We also found two hypomethylated loci annotated to the DNA repair gene XRCC5. Groups of DML annotated to the same gene were linked to diabetes mellitus (KCNQ1), respiratory diseases (PTPRN2), the dopaminergic system of the brain and neurodegenerative diseases (NR4A2). The most significant possibly affected pathway was Axon guidance, with 86 potentially deregulated genes near DML. The cluster of gene sets that could be affected by DNA methylation in the Ostrava groups mainly includes the neuronal functions and biological processes of cell junctions and adhesion assembly. The study demonstrates that the differences in the type of air pollution between localities can affect a unique change in DNA methylation profiles across the human genome.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; air pollution; environment; epigenetics; molecular epidemiology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35163587 PMCID: PMC8915177 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031666
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Basic characteristics of subjects grouped according to the study locality.
| Study Locality | Ostrava | Prague | CB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples/subjects | 108/54 | 110/55 | 32/16 |
| Age (years) | 40.4; 9.3 | 39.3; 9.2 | 38.0; 6.4 |
| Mean; SD (median; min–max) | |||
| BMI | 28.6; 4.1 | 28.4; 3.9 | 28.2; 3.7 |
| Mean; SD (median; min–max) | |||
| Occupation duration (years) | 13.9; 7.9 | 11.8; 6.7 | 10.2; 7.5 |
| Mean; SD (median; min–max) |
(A) Concentrations of selected air pollutants in study cities during the three-month period before sampling. (B) A comparison of annual mean concentrations of PM2.5, B[a]P and NO2 in all study cities in 2016–2019.
| (A) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ostrava | Prague | CB | |||||
| Winter | Summer | Winter | Summer | Winter | Summer | ||
|
| Mean; SD | 24.4; 19.1 | 11.3; 5.3 | 15.0; 13.4 | 9.1; 4.2 | 15.4; 11.9 | 9.7; 4.2 |
| µg/m3 | Median | 19.8 | 10.3 | 10.4 | 8.3 | 12.3 | 9.1 |
|
| Mean; SD | 4.1; 3.3 | 0.3; 0.3 | 3.6; 3.0 | 0.1; 0.1 | 2.00; 1.01 | 0.1; 0.1 |
| ng/m3 | Median | 2.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0.0 |
|
| Mean; SD | 19.9; 9.4 | 10.9; 3.70 | 19.5; 8.9 | 17.9; 5.5 | 17.6; 8.2 | 9.8; 2.6 |
| µg/m3 | Median | 19.0 | 10.3 | 16.9 | 18.3 | 14.1 | 9.8 |
| ( | |||||||
|
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |||
| Ostrava | Mean; SD | 22.2; 18.3 | 21.7; 15.9 | 22.9; 18.2 | 17.4; 14.4 | ||
| Prague | 16.5; 13.8 | 16.7; 12.2. | 18.0; 15.2 | 12.3; 9.9 | |||
| CB | 18.5; 14.8 | 14.6; 10.4 | 16.0; 13.6 | 12.8; 10.4 | |||
|
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |||
| Ostrava | Mean; SD | 2.2; 0.9 | 2.5; 0.7 | 2.9; 0.9 | 2.0; 0.6 | ||
| Prague * | 0.8; 0.3 | 0.9; 0.3 | 0.8; 0.2 | 0.7; 0.2 | |||
| CB | 1.5; 0.5 | 1.3; 0.5 | 1.1; 0.3 | 1.2; 0.4 | |||
|
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |||
| Ostrava | Mean; SD | 16.4; 15.0 | 16.2; 13.6 | 17.2; 15.4 | 15.2; 13.5 | ||
| Prague # | 25.6; 24.0 | 31.0; 29.1 | 33.0; 31.8 | 28.6; 27.5 | |||
| CB | 15.7; 14.2 | 15.4; 13.7 | 14.9; 13.8 | 12.9; 6.9 | |||
*# Due to incomplete data from the Prague 5 station, we used information from other stations in other districts: Prague 4 (B[a]P)—a 50 m distance from a main road; Prague 1 (NO2)—the main square in the city center.
Figure A1T lymphocytes—Th helper cells; CD8 T lymphocytes—Tc cytotoxic cells; NK cells—natural killer cells (between CB, Ostrava and Prague samples).
Figure 1PCA shows no differences between the spring and autumn sampling periods.
Figure 2General DNA methylation profiling represented by PCA and heatmaps for comparison: (a) Ostrava–Prague; (b) Ostrava–CB; (c) Prague–CB. In the heatmap, hierarchical clustering for all samples (represented by columns) for the most significant DML are shown (n = 10, n = 10, n = 3, respectively).
Description of the 10 (or 3) most DML in samples from (a) Ostrava–Prague, (b) Ostrava–CB and (c) Prague–CB.
| CpG Locus | Chromosome | Relation to Island * | Gene | log2FC | Adj | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| cg10123377 | 3 | Open Sea |
| −1.92 | 8.30 × 10−4 |
| cg24851651 | 11 | S Shelf |
| −1.21 | 8.53 × 10−3 | |
| cg11173636 | 10 | Open Sea |
| −1.19 | 4.04 × 10−3 | |
| cg27210166 | 17 | Open Sea |
| −0.90 | 2.55 × 10−3 | |
| cg08584759 | 10 | Island |
| −0.87 | 8.30 × 10−4 | |
| cg12088417 | 17 | Open Sea |
| −0.86 | 7.05 × 10−4 | |
| cg02783661 | 12 | S Shelf |
| −0.78 | 2.91 × 10−3 | |
| cg11478607 | 22 | Island |
| 0.76 | 8.62 × 10−3 | |
| cg26946806 | 22 | S Shore |
| 0.81 | 8.37 × 10−3 | |
| cg12797548 | 1 | Open Sea |
| 0.83 | 6.69 × 10−4 | |
|
| cg13092766 | 2 | Island |
| −0.91 | 7.49 × 10−3 |
| cg13369607 | 19 | Island |
| −0.63 | 5.44 × 10−3 | |
| cg03275306 | 15 | Open Sea |
| −0.53 | 3.63 × 10−3 | |
| cg00344443 | 11 | Island |
| 0.53 | 7.49 × 10−3 | |
| cg25358315 | 2 | Island |
| 0.57 | 3.63 × 10−3 | |
| cg14807682 | 8 | Island | -- | 0.57 | 7.49 × 10−3 | |
| cg17734803 | 1 | Island |
| 0.62 | 7.49 × 10−3 | |
| cg26608883 | 11 | Island |
| 0.71 | 7.49 × 10−3 | |
| cg07019285 | 10 | Open Sea |
| 0.87 | 9.86 × 10−3 | |
| cg18843803 | 19 | Open Sea |
| 1.95 | 3.63 × 10−3 | |
|
| cg17265515 | 8 | Open Sea |
| −1.59 | 5.05 × 10−3 |
| cg10380095 | 7 | Open Sea | -- | −0.31 | 5.05 × 10−3 | |
| cg26953288 | 8 | S Shore |
| 0.55 | 1.48 × 10−3 |
Abbreviations: CCS (copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase), RP11-170M17.1 (NA), RPTOR (regulatory-associated protein of MTOR complex 1), C10orf47 (also known as PROSER2, proline- and serine-rich 2), CCDC77 (coiled-coil domain containing 77), GSTT1 (glutathione S-transferase theta 1), NME7 (NME/NM23 family member 7), BCL2L11 (BCL2-like 11), SAFB2 (scaffold attachment factor B2), BCL2A1 (bcl-2-related protein A1), AP000797.3 (NA), CAPG (capping actin protein), FOXD3-AS1 (FOXD3 antisense RNA 1), CALCB (calcitonin-related polypeptide beta), CALML3-AS1 (CALML3 antisense RNA 1), TSHZ3 (teashirt zinc finger homeobox 3), ERICH1 (glutamate-rich 1), BAI1 (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor B1); --- (out of gene).* Gene transcription is dependent on location of the CpG loci in the genome [28]. Islands are densely covered by CpG sites, mostly situated in promoters of housekeeping genes. Shores are tissue-specific regions with lower density of CpG sites, 2 kb distance from CpG islands. Shelves (2–4 kb from CpG island) and Open sea (>4 kb from CpG island) are more dynamic regions [29].
Figure 3A proportion of annotated CpG loci according to distance from CpG islands for differentially methylated sites for the Ostrava–Prague group compared to all evaluated CpG loci (A), where the highest representation of loci is in Open Sea. A resolution to hypomethylated and hypermethylated sites is comparable (B). A proportion of annotated methylated genomic regions to gene position shows a higher proportion of promoters in Ostrava–Prague annotated genomic regions than in all genomic regions (C).
(A) Selected DMG with high relevance to health impacts discussed in Section 3. The main importance is adopted from the Human Gene Database (genecards.org). N = number of DLM; chr = chromosome; Hypo = hypomethylated loci; Hyper = hypermethylated loci. All parameters for these DMG are shown in Table S2. (B) Selected DMG with more than 15 loci in one annotated gene.
| (A) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| CpG Probes | Adj. | Importance |
| 5.62 × 10−3, | DNA repair–non homologous end joining (NHEJ) | ||
| 4.61 × 10−3 | Autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases | ||
| 7.40 × 10−4 | Reduction in cell proliferation, Cell cycle termination | ||
| ( | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 7.05 × 10−4 | RPTOR encodes part of a signaling pathway regulating cell growth which responds to nutrient and insulin levels. | ||
| 1.16 × 10−3 | COL23A1 encodes a transmembrane nonfibrillar collagen. This kind of collagen has a single pass hydrophobic transmembrane domain. | ||
| 4.62 × 10−3 | This gene encodes a voltage-gated potassium channel required for the repolarization phase of the cardiac action potential. | ||
| 2.35 × 10−3 | Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type N2 encodes a major islet autoantigen in type-1 diabetes. PTPRN2 plays an important role in the epigenetic regulation of metabolic diseases and cancers. | ||
Abbreviations: XRCC5 (X-Ray Repair Cross-Complementing 5), NR4A2 (Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4 Group A Member 2), CDK2AP1 (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2-Associated Protein 1), RPTOR (regulatory-associated protein of MTOR complex 1), COL23A1 (Collagen Type-XXIII Alpha 1 Chain), KCNQ1 (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 1), PTPRN2 (Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type N2).
Figure 4Gene ontology characterized by KEGG-affected pathways for genes annotated to significant CpG loci (A). The gene set enrichment map based on the distance of each gene in biological processes (B).