| Literature DB >> 35163556 |
Ying-Hsien Huang1,2, Wei-Shiung Lian3,4, Feng-Sheng Wang3,4, Pei-Wen Wang3,5, Hung-Yu Lin6, Ming-Chao Tsai7, Ya-Ling Yang2,8.
Abstract
A high-fat diet is responsible for hepatic fat accumulation that sustains chronic liver damage and increases the risks of steatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MicroRNA-29a (miR-29a), a key regulator of cellular behaviors, is present in anti-fibrosis and modulator tumorigenesis. However, the increased transparency of the correlation between miR-29a and the progression of human HCC is still further investigated. In this study, we predicted HIF-1α and ANGPT2 as regulators of HCC by the OncoMir cancer database and showed a strong positive correlation with HIF-1α and ANGPT2 gene expression in HCC patients. Mice fed the western diet (WD) while administered CCl4 for 25 weeks induced chronic liver damage and higher HCC incidence than without fed WD mice. HCC section staining revealed signaling upregulation in ki67, severe fibrosis, and steatosis in WD and CCl4 mice and detected Col3a1 gene expressions. HCC tissues significantly attenuated miR-29a but increased in HIF-1α, ANGPT2, Lox, Loxl2, and VEGFA expression. Luciferase activity analysis confirms that miR-29a specific binding 3'UTR of HIF-1α and ANGPT2 to repress expression. In summary, miR-29a control HIF-1α and ANGPT2 signaling in HCC formation. This study insight into a novel molecular pathway by which miR-29a targeting HIF-1α and ANGPT2 counteracts the incidence of HCC development.Entities:
Keywords: ANGPT2; HIF-1α; hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-29a
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35163556 PMCID: PMC8835722 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Interpretation of miR-29a regulates HIF1A and ANGPT2 expression. The OncoMir database analysis delineates the miR-29a interaction edge that suppressed the expression of HIF1A, ANGPT2, and VEGFA.
Figure 2The HIF1A and ANGPT2 expression were committed on HCC patients. (A,B) The HIF–1 and ANGPT2 expression levels in human HCC and normal tissue by regained of TCGA cohort database. (C,D) The HIF–1 and ANGPT2 expression levels are significantly correlated with the probability of survival in HCC patients by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. *** p-value < 0.001 was comparative between the normal and HCC group.
Figure 3Western diet (WD) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) treatment promote HCC formation in the mouse. (A) Schematic diagram of establishing a mouse HCC process. (B,C) Observation of appearance and body shape of mice in HCC and the range of weight change in time course. (D) Representative liver tissue macroscopic images and WD/CCl4 group indicate the number of red arrow numbers. (E) Liver tissue section of the WD/CCl4 group showed ki67 positive immunostaining. Scale bar, 2mm, and 40μm indicated low and high magnificently. (F) Masson trichrome stained livers presence of hepatic fibrosis and steatohepatitis. Scale bar, 40 μm. (G) Col3a1 gene expression elevated in WD/CCl4 treated group. Data per group are expressed as mean ± SEM calculated from six to seven mice. * p-value < 0.05; *** p-value < 0.0001 between groups.
Figure 4Differential expression of tumorigenesis associated genes expression in liver tissue of ND/CCl4 and WD/CCl4 group. (A) The expression of miR-29a in the WD/CCl4 treatment group was significantly reduced, and (B–F) five related genes were significantly increased. Data per group are expressed as mean ± SEM calculated from five to six mice. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.001 between groups.
Figure 5Effect of miR-29a signaling on HIF-1a and ANGPT2 in hepatocytes. (A,B) Illustrated 3’UTR sequences of HIF-1a and ANGPT2 are specific for miR-29a binding. Overexpression of miR-29a decreased 3’UTR luciferase report activity (C,D) and protein activities (E,F) of HIF-1a and ANGPT2. Knocking down by mutant sequence of HIF-1a and ANGPT2 are diminished miR-29a-3′-UTR luciferase reporter activity. Data per group are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001 between groups.
Sequence of primers pairs.
| Gene Name | Forward Primers (5′➞3′) | Reverse Primers (5′➞3′) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ACGTAAGCACTGGTGGACAG | CAGGAGGGCCATAGCTGAAC |
|
| CGGAAACTCCAAAGCCACTT | GCTGGCTGATCTTGAATCTG G |
|
| CCGCGGGCAAAATAAGTAGC | CACATGCGTCAAACCACCAG |
|
| GACCACAGGGTACTGCTACG | TGGCTGAATTCGTCCATGCT |
|
| CTGACTTCCGCCCCAAGAAT | GTTGAGGCTCAGCAGGTCAT |
|
| CCCACGTCAGAGAGCAACAT | TGCGCTTTCGTTTTTGACCC |
|
| GCACAGTCAAGGCCGAGAAT | GCCTTCTCCATGGTGGTG |