Literature DB >> 35163120

In Vivo Biocompatibility Investigation of an Injectable Calcium Carbonate (Vaterite) as a Bone Substitute including Compositional Analysis via SEM-EDX Technology.

Ronald E Unger1, Sanja Stojanovic2,3, Laura Besch4, Said Alkildani5,6, Romina Schröder4, Ole Jung6, Caroline Bogram5, Oliver Görke7, Stevo Najman2,3, Wolfgang Tremel4, Mike Barbeck7.   

Abstract

Injectable bone substitutes (IBS) are increasingly being used in the fields of orthopedics and maxillofacial/oral surgery. The rheological properties of IBS allow for proper and less invasive filling of bony defects. Vaterite is the most unstable crystalline polymorph of calcium carbonate and is known to be able to transform into hydroxyapatite upon contact with an organic fluid (e.g., interstitial body fluid). Two different concentrations of hydrogels based on poly(ethylene glycol)-acetal-dimethacrylat (PEG-a-DMA), i.e., 8% (w/v) (VH-A) or 10% (w/v) (VH-B), were combined with vaterite nanoparticles and implanted in subcutaneous pockets of BALB/c mice for 15 and 30 days. Explants were prepared for histochemical staining and immunohistochemical detection methods to determine macrophage polarization, and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) to analyze elemental composition was used for the analysis. The histopathological analysis revealed a comparable moderate tissue reaction to the hydrogels mainly involving macrophages. Moreover, the hydrogels underwent a slow cellular infiltration, revealing a different degradation behavior compared to other IBS. The immunohistochemical detection showed that M1 macrophages were mainly found at the material surfaces being involved in the cell-mediated degradation and tissue integration, while M2 macrophages were predominantly found within the reactive connective tissue. Furthermore, the histomorphometrical analysis revealed balanced numbers of pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages, demonstrating that both hydrogels are favorable materials for bone tissue regeneration. Finally, the EDX analysis showed a stepwise transformation of the vaterite particle into hydroxyapatite. Overall, the results of the present study demonstrate that hydrogels including nano-vaterite particles are biocompatible and suitable for bone tissue regeneration applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDX mapping; biomaterial-induced multinucleated giant cells; bone tissue engineering; calcium carbonate; guided bone regeneration; injectable bone substitutes; vaterite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35163120      PMCID: PMC8835873          DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  51 in total

Review 1.  Multinucleated giant cells.

Authors:  J M Anderson
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.284

Review 2.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.

Authors:  James M Anderson; Analiz Rodriguez; David T Chang
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 11.130

3.  Sinus Floor Elevation Using the Lateral Approach and Window Repositioning and a Xenogeneic Bone Substitute as a Grafting Material: A Histologic, Histomorphometric, and Radiographic Analysis.

Authors:  Georges Tawil; Mike Barbeck; Ronald Unger; Peter Tawil; Franck Witte
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  High-Temperature Sintering of Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes Leads to Increased Multinucleated Giant Cell Formation: In Vivo and Preliminary Clinical Results.

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Samuel Udeabor; Jonas Lorenz; Markus Schlee; Marzellus Grosse Holthaus; Nina Raetscho; Joseph Choukroun; Robert Sader; C James Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Monocyte preseeding leads to an increased implant bed vascularization of biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitutes via vessel maturation.

Authors:  M Barbeck; R E Unger; P Booms; E Dohle; R A Sader; C J Kirkpatrick; S Ghanaati
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 6.  Specialized Histological and Histomorphometrical Analytical Methods for Biocompatibility Testing of Biomaterials for Maxillofacial Surgery in (Pre-) Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Carolin Lindner; Annica PrÖhl; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck; Manuel Abels; Tom LÖffler; Milijana Batinic
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Macrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Patricia J Brooks; Oriyah Barzilay; Noah Fine; Michael Glogauer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  An actin-based protrusion originating from a podosome-enriched region initiates macrophage fusion.

Authors:  James J Faust; Arnat Balabiyev; John M Heddleston; Nataly P Podolnikova; D Page Baluch; Teng-Leong Chew; Tatiana P Ugarova
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Analysis of the in vitro degradation and the in vivo tissue response to bi-layered 3D-printed scaffolds combining PLA and biphasic PLA/bioglass components - Guidance of the inflammatory response as basis for osteochondral regeneration.

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Tiziano Serra; Patrick Booms; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Elisabeth Engel; Robert Sader; Charles James Kirkpatrick; Melba Navarro; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.