| Literature DB >> 35162095 |
Paula Wittels1, Tess Kay2, Louise Mansfield1.
Abstract
Socioeconomic status (SES) is known to influence strongly both life expectancy and healthy life expectancy. Whilst there are multiple factors with complex interactions that provide the explanation for this observation, differences in the uptake of physical activity between high and low SES groups play a role. This in-depth qualitative study set out to understand the response of a group of mothers with young children living in a low SES area of a London (UK) borough to the current physical activity guidance and to investigate whether existing and established interventions based on behavior change are appropriate for this group. A series of three in depth interviews was carried out with the mothers (n = 20) over a period of 16 months, and the data collected were analyzed thematically. Four main themes were identified: (1) mothering comes before exercise; (2) mothers are a special case; (3) alone or together; and (4) facilities fail mothers. The mothers were unsure about the benefits of exercise, whether it was relevant for them and how to accommodate exercise alongside their mothering responsibilities. Family and peer group could be both a barrier and a facilitator to participation in physical activity. Without an in depth understanding of the role of physical activity in the lives of mothers of young children, behavior change-based public interventions are likely to fail to meet the needs of this group. A reduction in the current health inequities will only be possible when the needs of the mothers are acknowledged and used as the basis of appropriate public health guidance.Entities:
Keywords: behavior change; ethic of care; motherhood; physical activity; public health guidance; qualitative; socioeconomic status
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35162095 PMCID: PMC8833933 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Participant demographics.
| Interviewee (Number of Interviews) | Age | Ethnicity | No of Children | Living with Partner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sumi (2) | 39 | Indian British | 1 | yes |
| Fatima (3) | 25 | North African | 1 | yes |
| Naseem (3) | 40 | Pakistani Danish | 3 | yes |
| Vicki (2) | 32 | White South African | 1 | yes |
| Radhika (2) | 31 | Indian | 1 | yes |
| Aahna (1) | 29 | Indian | 1 | yes |
| Eva (2) | 31 | White Eastern European | 1 | yes |
| Christine (2) | 42 | Filipino | 2 | yes |
| Jade (3) | 37 | Indian British | 2 | yes |
| Rozina (1) | 32 | Indian | 1 | yes |
| Shabnam (3) | 44 | Pakistani British | 2 | yes |
| Eisha (3) | 24 | North African | 1 | yes |
| Nori (3) | 29 | Pakistani British | 3 | yes |
| Kirti (3) | 37 | Indian British | 3 | yes |
| Lilly (1) | 34 | Sri Lankan British | 1 | yes |
| Meenakshi (3) | 32 | Indian British | 1 | yes |
| Rachel (3) | 41 | White British | 1 | no |
| Jaswinder (2) | 29 | Indian British | 1 | yes |
| Alison (3) | 43 | White British | 1 | yes |
| Yasmine (1) | 43 | Pakistani British | 1 | yes |