| Literature DB >> 35161075 |
Wenfei Zhou1, Huiling Du1, Le Kang1, Xian Du1, Yupu Shi1, Xiaojing Qiang1, Haodong Li1, Jing Zhao1.
Abstract
The resource and large-scale utilization of waste ceramic materials, magnesium slag, and coal gangue are one of the important ways for the sustainable development in metallurgy, coal, and other related enterprises. In this paper, waste ceramic materials were used as aggregates; coal gangue and magnesium slag were used as mixed binder; and the all solid-waste-based permeable bricks with excellent performance were prepared by forming pressure at 5 MPa. The mechanical properties and water permeability of the all-solid-waste-based permeable bricks were evaluated. The results proved that the porous channel of permeable brick is mainly composed of waste ceramic materials with a particle size of 2-3 mm. Pore structures below 200 μm were mainly composed of fine aggregate and mixed binder. Using 60% coarse aggregate, 20% fine aggregate, 10% coal gangue, and 10% magnesium slag as raw materials, the all-solid-waste-based permeable bricks were obtained by pressing at 6 MPa and sintering at 1200 °C, which exhibited the best performance, and its water permeability, compressive strength, and apparent porosity were 1.56 × 10-2 cm/s, 35.45 MPa, and 13.15%, respectively. Excellent water permeability, compressive strength, and apparent porosity of the all solid-waste-based permeable bricks were ascribed to the high content of connecting open pores, and closely adhesive force were ascribed to the porous microstructure constructed by the grading of waste ceramic materials and the tight conjoined points of the liquid phases in coal gangue and magnesium slag at a high sintering temperature.Entities:
Keywords: coal gangue; magnesium slag; permeability; sintered brick; waste ceramic materials
Year: 2022 PMID: 35161075 PMCID: PMC8838147 DOI: 10.3390/ma15031130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The mix proportion of permeable bricks.
| Sample | Fine Aggregate/% | Coarse Aggregate/% | CG/% | MS/% | °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-1 | 80 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 1200 |
| A-2 | 60 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1200 |
| A-3 | 40 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1200 |
| A-4 | 20 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 1200 |
| A-5 | 0 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 1200 |
| B-1 | 60 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 1200 |
| B-2 | 60 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 1200 |
| B-3 | 60 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 1200 |
| B-4 | 60 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1200 |
| B-5 | 60 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 1200 |
| B-6 | 60 | 20 | 16 | 4 | 1200 |
| B-7 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 1200 |
| C-1 | 60 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 1125 |
| C-2 | 60 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 1150 |
| C-3 | 60 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 1175 |
| C-4 | 60 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 1200 |
| C-5 | 60 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 1225 |
Figure 1The preparation process of permeable bricks.
The chemical composition of raw materials (mass fraction, %).
| Samples | CaO | MgO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | TiO2 | K2O | Na2O | Loss on Ignition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | 39.57 | 1.18 | 6.64 | 16.51 | 1.77 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.46 | 17.03 |
| CG | 0.82 | 1.57 | 61.39 | 23.76 | 4.14 | 0.79 | 2.82 | 1.62 | 2.11 |
| CW | 1.17 | 0.64 | 39.10 | 12.2 | 1.28 | 0.34 | 2.18 | 2.09 | 40.02 |
Figure 2XRD pattern of samples: (a) raw materials; (b) mixing binder with different CG content sintered at 1200 °C; and (c) samples under different sintering temperatures with 8% CG in mixing binder.
Figure 3Optical images of the sample at 1200 °C with different content of coarse aggregate: (a) 0%; (b) 50%; and (c) 100%.
Figure 4SEM morphologies of samples sintered at 1200 °C with different CG contents: (a) 0%; (b) 8%; (c) 12%; and (d) 20%.
Figure 5SEM photographs of samples at different temperatures: (a) 1125 °C; (b) 1150 °C; (c) 1175 °C; (d) 1200 °C; (e) 1225 °C; and (f) the brick sintered at 1225 °C.
EDS analysis of samples at different sintering temperatures: (a) 1125 °C; (b) 1150 °C; (c) 1175 °C; (d) 1200 °C; and (e) 1225 °C.
| Elements | O | Si | Al | Ca | Fe | Mg | Na | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | 39.49 | 10.73 | 10.94 | 38.84 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| (b) | 24.04 | 18.87 | 12.94 | 40.30 | 2.71 | 1.13 | 0 | 100 |
| (c) | 18.42 | 23.50 | 14.27 | 39.67 | 2.69 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 100 |
| (d) | 19.84 | 26.27 | 14.62 | 31.53 | 4.94 | 1.63 | 0 | 100 |
| (e) | 16.00 | 27.51 | 17.37 | 30.89 | 2.90 | 3.48 | 0.5 | 100 |
Figure 6(a) The influence of radius on the velocity of water flow; (b) the trend f permeability, apparent porosity, and compressive strength with different fine aggregate content; and (c) fitting curves of compressive strength and permeability with apparent porosity.
Figure 7The trend of permeability coefficient, apparent porosity, and compressive strength with different CG contents at 1200 °C.
Figure 8(a) The trend of permeability and compressive strength in the sample sintered at different temperatures; (b) the comparison of this work with bricks in other references.