| Literature DB >> 35159443 |
Goldy De Bhowmick1, Maria Hayes1.
Abstract
Seaweed biomass is considered a valuable and potential, alternative protein source but it is currently under-exploited. Seaweed or Macroalgae do not require arable land and freshwater for their cultivation, they are fast growing and contain several health ingredients and beneficial macronutrients. In this study, we determined the in vitro k-Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (k-PDCAAS) values of six different, Irish seaweeds using the rapid k-PDCAAS method. Based on the amino acid profile and protein content of each seaweed, the in vitro protein digestibility and k-PDCAAS scores were calculated. In addition, the limiting amino acid(s) for each of the six seaweeds was/were determined. Results suggest that although the in vitro digestibility was quite similar for all analyzed seaweeds, their k-PDCAAS scores varied significantly. The red seaweed Palmaria palmata had a k-PDCAAS score of 0.69 ± 0.014, while Fucus serratus had a value of 0.63 ± 0.084 and Alaria esculenta a value of 0.59 ± 0.021. The seaweeds were found to be rich in essential amino acids and taurine. Overall, the amino acid composition of the seaweeds studied suggests that they are suitable alternative protein sources for use in human nutrition providing both essential and non-essential amino acids to the consumer.Entities:
Keywords: essential amino acids; in vitro protein digestibility; k-PDCAAS; limiting amino acids; seaweeds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35159443 PMCID: PMC8834047 DOI: 10.3390/foods11030289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
In vitro digestibility, k-PDCAAS, percentage protein and amino acid score values for six Irish seaweeds.
| Sample Name | In Vitro Digestibility | Amino Acid Score | K-PDCAAS | Crude Protein (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown seaweeds | ||||
|
| 0.78 ± 0.002 | 0.751 ± 0.022 | 0.59 ± 0.021 | 9.96 ± 0.51 |
|
| 0.77 ± 0.001 | 0.825 ± 0.108 | 0.63 ± 0.084 | 6.122 ± 1.18 |
|
| 0.82 ± 0.001 | 0.101 ± 0.002 | 0.08 ± 0.013 | 9.02 ± 0.26 |
| Green seaweed | ||||
|
| 0.79 ± 0.003 | 0.184 ± 0.012 | 0.15 ± 0.014 | 5.37 ± 0.74 |
| Red seaweeds | ||||
|
| 0.78 ± 0.002 | 0.883 ± 0.019 | 0.69 ± 0.014 | 7.78 ± 0.42 |
|
| 0.79 ± 0.001 | 0.393 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 7.523 ± 0.02 |
All average values are represented with standard deviation based on two individual analyses. Significant difference between samples were observed for amino acid score and K-PDCAAS, p < 0.05; p value: 0.00435, 0.00128.
Amino acid profiles of the six seaweeds and ratios of the amino acid corresponding to the reference protein.
| Amino Acids |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total AA (g/100 g CP) | Ratio | Total AA (g/100 g CP) | Ratio | Total AA (g/100 g CP) | Ratio | Total AA (g/100 g CP) | Ratio | Total AA (g/100 g CP) | Ratio | Total AA (g/100 g CP) | Ratio | |
| L-Cys + L-Met | 0.35 ± 0.001 | 1.18 ± 0.001 | 0.15 ± 0.0001 | 0.92 ± 0.0001 | 0.89 ± 0.009 | 3.30 ± 0.009 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.11 ± 0.001 | 0.49 ± 0.002 | 1.55 ± 0.002 | 0.07 ± 0.0002 | 0.25 ± 0.0002 |
| L-Trp | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| L-Hydroxy Pro | 0.0 ± 0.0 | - | 0.0 ± 0.0 | - | 0.0 ± 0.0 | - | 0.08 ± 0.001 | - | 0.0 ± 0.0 | - | 0.0 ± 0.0 | - |
| L-Asp | 0.99 ± 0.002 | - | 0.98 ± 0.03 | - | 0.47 ± 0.02 | - | 0.94 ± 0.05 | - | 1.03 ± 0.006 | - | 1.50 ± 0.10 | - |
| L-Thr | 0.46 ± 0.009 | 1.15 ± 0.009 | 0.50 ± 0.005 | 2.19 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.013 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.002 | 1.63 ± 0.001 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.034 | 1.88 ± 0.034 |
| L-Ser | 0.51 ± 0.02 | - | 0.63 ± 0.012 | - | 0.07 ± 0.0007 | - | 0.66 ± 0.001 | - | 0.51 ± 0.001 | - | 1.02 ± 0.048 | - |
| L-Glu | 1.41 ± 0.001 | - | 0.57 ± 0.01 | - | 1.71 ± 0.01 | - | 0.78 ± 0.003 | - | 1.52 ± 0.013 | - | 1.27 ± 0.05 | - |
| L-Pro | 0.48 ± 0.006 | - | 0.36 ± 0.017 | - | 0.34 ± 0.001 | - | 0.44 ± 0.01 | - | 0.44 ± 0.004 | - | 0.62 ± 0.008 | - |
| L-Gly | 0.53 ± 0.001 | - | 1.40 ± 0.08 | - | 0.17 ± 0.005 | - | 1.39 ± 0.05 | - | 0.58 ± 0.031 | - | 2.09 ± 0.02 | - |
| L-Ala | 0.63 ± 0.009 | - | 1.42 ± 0.02 | - | 0.46 ± 0.03 | - | 1.50 ± 0.04 | - | 0.63 ± 0.003 | - | 2.01 ± 0.06 | - |
| L-Val | 0.54 ± 0.002 | 1.31 ± 0.002 | 0.56 ± 0.018 | 2.43 ± 0.017 | 0.12 ± 0.001 | 0.32 ± 0.001 | 0.60 ± 0.004 | 2.02 ± 0.003 | 0.62 ± 0.008 | 1.40 ± 0.008 | 0.95 ± 0.024 | 2.29 ± 0.02 |
| L-Ile | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 1.85 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.001 | 0.39 ± 0.001 | 0.33 ± 0.006 | 1.39 ± 0.006 | 0.36 ± 0.001 | 1.04 ± 0.001 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 1.87 ± 0.01 |
| L-Leu | 0.71 ± 0.004 | 0.91 ± 0.004 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 1.30 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.001 | 0.08 ± 0.001 | 0.58 ± 0.008 | 1.03 ± 0.008 | 0.59 ± 0.002 | 0.71 ± 0.002 | 0.91 ± 0.02 | 1.16 ± 0.02 |
| L-Tyr + L-Phe | 0.47 ± 0.001 | 0.63 ± 0.001 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 0.85 ± 0.01 | 1.24 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.009 | 0.58 ± 0.009 | 0.43 ± 0.006 | 0.55 ± 0.006 | 0.46 ± 0.006 | 0.62 ± 0.006 |
| L-Lys | 0.53 ± 0.002 | 0.77 ± 0.002 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.08 | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 0.29 ± 0.009 | 0.58 ± 0.009 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.01 |
| L-His | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 2.25 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.0002 | 0.76 ± 0.0002 | 0.57 ± 0.002 | 2.77 ± 0.002 | 0.08 ± 0.002 | 0.47 ± 0.002 | 0.47 ± 0.015 | 1.95 ± 0.015 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.48 ± 0.01 |
| L-Arg | 0.70 ± 0.015 | - | 0.25 ± 0.009 | - | 0.12 ± 0.031 | - | 0.27 ± 0.002 | - | 0.60 ± 0.001 | - | 0.38 ± 0.014 | - |
All average values are represented with standard deviation based on two individual analyses. Significant difference between samples were observed for amino acid profile, p < 0.05; p value: 0.020.
Comparison of k-PDCAAS values referenced for plants compared to tested seaweeds.
| Food Materials | PDCAAS | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Vegetables | 0.73 | [ |
| Fresh and dry fruits | 0.64 | [ |
| Soy | 0.91 | [ |
| Wheat | 0.42 | [ |
| Rice | 0.81 | [ |
| Chickpeas | 0.62–0.65 | [ |
| Barley | 0.44–0.53 | [ |
| 0.327 | [ | |
| 0.69 | In this study | |
| 0.31 | In this study | |
| 0.59 | In this study | |
| 0.63 | In this study | |
| 0.08 | In this study | |
| 0.15 | In this study |