Literature DB >> 16001874

Effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and amino acid availability in foods.

G Sarwar Gilani1, Kevin A Cockell, Estatira Sepehr.   

Abstract

Digestibility of protein in traditional diets from developing countries such as India, Guatemala, and Brazil is considerably lower compared to that of protein in typical North American diets (54-78 versus 88-94%). The presence of less digestible protein fractions, high levels of insoluble fiber, and high concentrations of antinutritional factors in the diets of developing countries, which are based on less refined cereals and grain legumes as major sources of protein, are responsible for poor digestibility of protein. The effects of the presence of some of the important antinutritional factors on protein and amino digestibilities of food and feed products are reviewed in this chapter. Food and feed products may contain a number of antinutritional factors that may adversely affect protein digestibility and amino acid availability. Antinutritional factors may occur naturally, such as glucosinolates in mustard and rapeseed protein products, trypsin inhibitors and hemagglutinins in legumes, tannins in legumes and cereals, phytates in cereals and oilseeds, and gossypol in cottonseed protein products. Antinutritional factors may also be formed during heat/alkaline processing of protein products, yielding Maillard compounds, oxidized forms of sulfur amino acids, D-amino acids, and lysinoalanine (LAL, an unnatural amino acid derivative). The presence of high levels of dietary trypsin inhibitors from soybeans, kidney beans, or other grain legumes can cause substantial reductions in protein and amino acid digestibilities (up to 50%) in rats and pigs. Similarly, the presence of high levels of tannins in cereals, such as sorghum, and grain legumes, such as fababean (Vicia faba L.), can result in significantly reduced protein and amino acid digestibilities (up to 23%) in rats, poultry, and pigs. Studies involving phytase supplementation of production rations for swine or poultry have provided indirect evidence that normally encountered levels of phytates in cereals and legumes can reduce protein and amino acid digestibilities by up to 10%. D-amino acids and LAL formed during alkaline/heat treatment of proteins such as casein, lactalbumin, soy protein isolate, or wheat proteins are poorly digestible (less than 40%), and their presence can reduce protein digestibility by up to 28% in rats and pigs. A comparison of the protein digestibility determination in young (5-week) versus old (20-month) rats suggests greater susceptibility to the adverse effects of antinutritional factors in old rats than in young rats. Therefore, the inclusion of protein digestibility data obtained with young rats, as the recommended animal model, in the calculation of PDCAAS (Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score) may overestimate protein digestibility and quality of products, especially those containing antinutritional factors, for the elderly. For products specifically intended for the elderly, protein digestibility should be determined using more mature rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16001874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  46 in total

1.  Estimation of the metabolizable energy equivalence of dietary proteins.

Authors:  Raquel Ferrer-Lorente; José Antonio Fernández-López; Marià Alemany
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Nutritional properties of green gram germinated in mineral fortified soak water: I. Effect of dehulling on total and bioaccessible nutrients and bioactive components.

Authors:  Morteza Oghbaei; Jamuna Prakash
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 3.  GutSelf: Interindividual Variability in the Processing of Dietary Compounds by the Human Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Barbara Walther; Aaron M Lett; Alessandra Bordoni; Lidia Tomás-Cobos; Juan Antonio Nieto; Didier Dupont; Francesca Danesi; Danit R Shahar; Ana Echaniz; Roberta Re; Aida Sainz Fernandez; Amélie Deglaire; Doreen Gille; Alexandra Schmid; Guy Vergères
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.914

4.  Influence of rice, pea and oat proteins in attenuating glycemic response of sugar-sweetened beverages.

Authors:  Sze-Yen Tan; Phei Ching Siow; Elaine Peh; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Chemical composition, energy, and amino acid digestibility in 7 cottonseed co-products fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  D L Ma; X K Ma; L Liu; S Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Fortification of traditional egg pasta (erişte) with edible insects: nutritional quality, cooking properties and sensory characteristics evaluation.

Authors:  Burcu Çabuk; Burak Yılmaz
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  Soy protein prevents renal damage in a fructose-induced model of metabolic syndrome via inhibition of NF-kB in male rats.

Authors:  Nallasamy Palanisamy; Carani Venkataraman Anuradha
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Bactericidal effect of hydrolysable and condensed tannin extracts on Campylobacter jejuni in vitro.

Authors:  Robin C Anderson; Maša Vodovnik; Byeng R Min; William E Pinchak; Nathan A Krueger; Roger B Harvey; David J Nisbet
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Effect of popping on sorghum starch digestibility and predicted glycemic index.

Authors:  Sanddhya Nathakattur Saravanabavan; Meera Manchanahally Shivanna; Sila Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.701

10.  The Potential Use of Fermented Chickpea and Faba Bean Flour as Food Ingredients.

Authors:  Maria V Chandra-Hioe; Christina H M Wong; Jayashree Arcot
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.