| Literature DB >> 35159297 |
Sonia Bellini1, Claudia Saraceno1, Luisa Benussi1, Rosanna Squitti1, Sara Cimini2, Martina Ricci2, Laura Canafoglia3, Cinzia Coppola4, Gianfranco Puoti4, Clarissa Ferrari5, Antonio Longobardi1, Roland Nicsanu1, Marta Lombardi6, Giulia D'Arrigo6, Claudia Verderio6, Giuliano Binetti7, Giacomina Rossi2, Roberta Ghidoni1.
Abstract
Cutting-edge research suggests endosomal/immune dysregulation in GRN/C9orf72-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). In this retrospective study, we investigated plasma small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) and complement proteins in 172 subjects (40 Sporadic FTLD, 40 Intermediate/Pathological C9orf72 expansion carriers, and 49 Heterozygous/Homozygous GRN mutation carriers, 43 controls). Plasma sEVs (concentration, size) were analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis; plasma and sEVs C1q, C4, C3 proteins were quantified by multiplex assay. We demonstrated that genetic/sporadic FTLD share lower sEV concentrations and higher sEV sizes. The diagnostic performance of the two most predictive variables (sEV concentration/size ratio) was high (AUC = 0.91, sensitivity 85.3%, specificity 81.4%). C1q, C4, and C3 cargo per sEV is increased in genetic and sporadic FTLD. C4 (cargo per sEV, total sEV concentration) is increased in Sporadic FTLD and reduced in GRN+ Homozygous, suggesting its specific unbalance compared with Heterozygous cases. C3 plasma level was increased in genetic vs. sporadic FTLD. Looking at complement protein compartmentalization, in control subjects, the C3 and C4 sEV concentrations were roughly half that in respect to those measured in plasma; interestingly, this compartmentalization was altered in different ways in patients. These results suggest sEVs and complement proteins as potential therapeutic targets to mitigate neurodegeneration in FTLD.Entities:
Keywords: C9orf72; GRN; biomarkers; complement proteins; endo-lysosomal pathway; extracellular vesicles; frontotemporal lobar degeneration; nanoparticle tracking analysis; neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis; plasma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35159297 PMCID: PMC8834212 DOI: 10.3390/cells11030488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Clinical, demographic, and biological characteristics of patients and controls included in the study.
| Ctrl | Sporadic FTLD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. | 43 | 9 | 31 | 46 | 3 | 40 | |
| Sex (% female) | 72.1 | 44.4 | 48.4 | 45.7 | 33.3 | 65.0 | 0.069 a |
| Age, years | 68.0 ± 10.6 | 67.2 ± 5.2 | 62.3 ± 9.9 | 61.4 ± 8.2 | 31.3 ± 6.8 | 67.7 ± 10.4 | <0.001 b |
| Onset, years | / | 64.1 ± 6.2 | 60.5 ± 9.9 | 59.8 ± 8.4 | 23.3 ± 1.5 | 64.4 ± 10.8 | <0.001 b |
| Education, years | 11.0 ± 3.7 | 8.6 ± 4.9 | 7.4 ± 2.9 | 7.9 ± 4.1 | n.a. | 8.0 ± 4.6 | <0.05 c |
| sEV Conc., sEVs/mL | 2.3 × 1011 ± 1.1 × 1011 | 1.5 × 1011 ± 7.1 × 1010 | 1.0 × 1011 ± 5.4 × 1010 | 9.7 × 1010 ± 4.9 × 1010 | 8.3 × 1010 ± 1.6 × 1010 | 1.1 × 1011 ± 6.3 × 1010 | <0.001 d |
| sEV Size, nm | 115.1 ± 14.5 | 137.4 ± 31.0 | 135.5 ± 11.5 | 147.6 ± 15.7 | 136.3 ± 14.3 | 135.1 ± 11.6 | <0.001 e |
| C1q, ng/sEV | 5.3 × 10−7 ± 5.4 × 10−7 | 6.2 × 10−7 ± 4.5 × 10−7 | 1.0 × 10−6 ± 1.0 × 10−6 | 1.1 × 10−6 ± 1.0 × 10−6 | 1.6 × 10−6 ± 3.4 × 10−7 | 1.0 × 10−6 ± 6.8 × 10−7 | <0.001 d |
| C4, ng/sEV | 6.7 × 10−7 ± 4.9 × 10−7 | 1.4 × 10−6 ± 9.5 × 10−7 | 2.0 × 10−6 ± 1.5 × 10−6 | 1.5 × 10−6 ± 8.3 × 10−7 | 6.9 × 10−7 ± 3.7 × 10−7 | 2.4 × 10−6 ± 1.6 × 10−6 | <0.001 d |
| C3, ng/sEV | 8.5 × 10−7 ± 6.2 × 10−7 | 2.2 × 10−6 ± 1.8 × 10−6 | 2.8 × 10−6 ± 2.9 × 10−6 | 3.3 × 10−6 ± 3.0 × 10−6 | 1.8 × 10−6 ± 2.3 × 10−6 | 3.0 × 10−6 ± 1.9 × 10−6 | <0.001 d |
| C1q Plasma, ng/mL | 9.6 × 104 ± 2.5 × 104 | 1.0 × 105 ± 2.7 × 104 | 7.9 × 104 ± 1.7 × 104 | 8.3 × 104 ± 3.0 × 104 | 7.0 × 104 ± 1.8 × 103 | 9.4 × 104 ± 2.6 × 104 | 0.439 d |
| C4 Plasma, ng/mL | 4.2 × 105 ± 1.6 × 105 | 4.6 × 105 ± 3.5 × 105 | 3.9 × 105 ± 1.4 × 105 | 4.7 × 105 ± 1.4 × 105 | 3.7 × 105 ± 1.4 × 105 | 3.7 × 105 ± 1.2 × 105 | 0.072 d |
| C3 Plasma, ng/mL | 5.3 × 105 ± 5.5 × 105 | 8.6 × 105 ± 5.6 × 105 | 1.3 × 106 ± 6.5 × 105 | 1.1 × 106 ± 9.0 × 105 | 8.9 × 105 ± 1.1 × 106 | 3.2 × 105 ± 4.1 × 105 | <0.001 d |
Ctrl = controls; C9orf72 Int. = C9orf72 intermediate expansion carriers; C9orf72 Pat. = C9orf72 pathological expansion carriers; GRN+ Het. = GRN heterozygous null and missense mutation carriers; GRN+ Homo. = GRN homozygous null mutation carriers; Sporadic FTLD = patients with sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration. a Chi-squared test (or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate); b one-way ANOVA test; c Kruskal–Wallis test; d generalized linear model (adjusted for age); e linear model (adjusted for age). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Analysis of plasma sEV concentration and size by NTA in patient and control groups. (a) sEV concentration (sEVs/mL), (b) sEV size (nm), and (c) sEV concentration/sEV size ratio in Ctrl, C9orf72 Int., C9orf72 Pat., GRN+ Het., GRN+ Homo., and Sporadic FTLD groups. Mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 obtained by generalized linear model (adjusted for age) for non-normally distributed variables (sEV concentration and sEV concentration/sEV size ratio) or by linear model (adjusted for age) for normally distributed variable (sEV size).
Figure 2C1q, C4, and C3 proteins (a) concentration per sEV (ng/sEV); (b) total concentration in sEVs (ng/mL), not normalized values; (c) concentration in plasma (ng/mL); and (d) total complement protein concentration in sEVs (ng/mL)/complement protein concentration in plasma (ng/mL) ratio in Ctrl, C9orf72 Int., C9orf72 Pat., GRN+ Het., GRN+ Homo., and Sporadic FTLD. Mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 obtained by the generalized linear model (adjusted for age) for non-normally distributed variables.
Figure 3Classification tree and ROC curves. (a) Classification obtained with dichotomized group variables, controls (Ctrl) vs. all patients (C9orf72 Int., C9orf72 Pat., GRN+ Het., GRN+ Homo., and Sporadic FTLD), based on the most predictive variables: sEV concentration and size, out of all biological variables associated with the groups. (b) Diagnostic capacity of sEV concentration/sEV size ratio to discriminate Ctrl from all patients. AUC comparison with DeLong test, ns p > 0.087.