Literature DB >> 35156881

Financial strain moderates genetic influences on self-rated health: support for diathesis-stress model of gene-environment interplay.

Deborah Finkel1,2, Catalina Zavala3, Carol E Franz4, Shandell Pahlen5, Margaret Gatz6, Nancy L Pedersen3,7, Brian K Finch8, Anna Dahl Aslan2,7, Vibeke S Catts9, Malin Ericsson7, Robert F Krueger10, Nicholas G Martin11, Adith Mohan9, Miriam A Mosing7,12, Carol A Prescott3, Keith E Whitfield13.   

Abstract

Data from the Interplay of Genes and Environment across Multiple Studies (IGEMS) consortium were used to examine predictions of different models of gene-by-environment interaction to understand how genetic variance in self-rated health (SRH) varies at different levels of financial strain. A total of 11,359 individuals from 10 twin studies in Australia, Sweden, and the United States contributed relevant data, including 2,074 monozygotic and 2,623 dizygotic twin pairs. Age ranged from 22 to 98 years, with a mean age of 61.05 (SD = 13.24). A factor model was used to create a harmonized measure of financial strain across studies and items. Twin analyses of genetic and environmental variance for SRH incorporating age, age2, sex, and financial strain moderators indicated significant financial strain moderation of genetic influences on self-rated health. Moderation results did not differ across sex or country. Genetic variance for SRH increased as financial strain increased, matching the predictions of the diathesis-stress and social comparison models for components of variance. Under these models, environmental improvements would be expected to reduce genetically based health disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35156881      PMCID: PMC9038652          DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2022.2037069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol        ISSN: 1948-5565


  39 in total

1.  Heritability of self-reported health.

Authors:  J C Romeis; J F Scherrer; H Xian; S A Eisen; K Bucholz; A C Heath; J Goldberg; M J Lyons; W G Henderson; W R True
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Self-rated health in a longitudinal perspective: a 9-year follow-up twin study.

Authors:  Pia Svedberg; Margaret Gatz; Paul Lichtenstein; Sven Sandin; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Defining the environment in gene-environment research: lessons from social epidemiology.

Authors:  Jason D Boardman; Jonathan Daw; Jeremy Freese
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old.

Authors:  G E McClearn; B Johansson; S Berg; N L Pedersen; F Ahern; S A Petrill; R Plomin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.

Authors:  E L Idler; Y Benyamini
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1997-03

6.  State of disparities in cardiovascular health in the United States.

Authors:  George A Mensah; Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Kurt J Greenlund; Janet B Croft
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Data Harmonization in Aging Research: Not so Fast.

Authors:  Margaret Gatz; Chandra A Reynolds; Deborah Finkel; Chris J Hahn; Yan Zhou; Catalina Zavala
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  A registry of adult African American twins: the Carolina African American Twin Study of Aging.

Authors:  Keith E Whitfield
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 1.587

9.  Facets of Subjective Health From Early Adulthood to Old Age.

Authors:  Carol E Franz; Deborah Finkel; Matthew S Panizzon; Kelly Spoon; Kaare Christensen; Margaret Gatz; William S Kremen; Robert Krueger; Jenae Neiderhiser; Chandra Reynolds; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2016-07-08

10.  Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status?

Authors:  Archana Singh-Manoux; Michael G Marmot; Nancy E Adler
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.