| Literature DB >> 35156341 |
Chaocheng Zhou1,2, Tianju Zhang3,4, Chao Zhang2, Xiaolin Liu2, Jun Wang3,4,5, Jia Lin2, Xianfeng Chen1,6.
Abstract
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been propelled into the limelight over the past decade due to the rapid-growing power conversion efficiency (PCE). However, the internal defects and the interfacial energy level mismatch are detrimental to the device performance and stability. In this study, it is demonstrated that a small amount of indium (In3+ ) ions in mixed cation and halide perovskites can effectively passivate the defects, improve the energy-level alignment, and reduce the exciton binding energy. Additionally, it is confirmed that In3+ ions can significantly elevate the initial carrier temperature, slow down the hot-carrier cooling rate, and reduce the heat loss before carrier extraction. The device with 1.5% of incorporated In3+ achieves a PCE of 22.4% with a negligible hysteresis, which is significantly higher than that of undoped PSCs (20.3%). In addition, the unencapsulated PSCs achieve long-term stability, which retain 85% of the original PCE after 3,000 h of aging in dry air. The obtained results demonstrate and promote the development of practical, highly efficient, and stable hot-carrier-enhanced PSCs.Entities:
Keywords: defect passivation; energy-level alignment; exciton binding energy; hot-carrier relaxation; perovskite solar cells
Year: 2022 PMID: 35156341 PMCID: PMC9008790 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1XRD and XPS characterizations of M:In perovskite thin films. a,b) XRD patterns of M:In films with x = 0, 1.5, 3, 5, and 10. GIWAXS patterns of c) control and d) M:In1.5 films. XPS data for e) I 3d, f) N 1s, and g) In 3d core levels of control and M:In1.5 perovskite films. h) Derived energy band diagram of the control, M:In1.5, and M:In3 perovskite films.
Figure 2Optical characterizations of the M:In perovskite films. a) UV–Vis absorption and PL spectra. TRPL of b) glass/perovskite and c) glass/SnO2/perovskite. The contour plot of temperature‐dependent PL spectra of the d) control and g) M:In1.5 thin films. Integrated PL intensity and FWHM of e,f) the control and h,i) M:In1.5 thin films as a function of temperature, respectively.
Figure 3TA characterizations and hot‐carrier dynamics. a,b) TA measurements of the control and M:In1.5 perovskite films under excitation at 2.38 eV with a carrier density of 3.76 × 1017 cm−3. c) Average hot‐carrier temperature as a function of delay time, and d) energy loss rate as a function of carrier temperature of the control and M:In1.5 perovskite films at a pump photon energy of 2.38 eV and carrier densities of 3.76 × 1017 cm−3.
Figure 4Device characterizations. a,b) J–V curves of the control and M:In1.5 devices. c,d) SCLC of the electron‐only devices. e) Dependence of V OC with light intensity of the control and M:In1.5 devices. f) Stability of the control and M:In1.5 devices.