Literature DB >> 35156205

Effects of Medicare advantage on patterns of end-of-life care among Medicare decedents.

Sungchul Park1, Joan M Teno2, Lindsay White3, Norma B Coe4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment on patterns of end-of-life care. DATA SOURCES: We used data from the Master Beneficiary Summary File, the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review, hospice claims, the Minimum Data Set, the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, the Area Health Resources File, and Geographic Variation Public Use File for 2012-2014. STUDY
DESIGN: To address selective enrollment into MA, we exploited a discontinuity in payment rates by county population (urban floor payments) as an instrument. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We identified Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled in MA or TM during their last year of life between 2012 and 2014 using Medicare administrative data. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We did not find evidence that MA enrollment led to a change in hospital admissions in the last 30 days of life, but MA enrollment decreased hospital as the site of death by 11.0 (95% CI: -13.9 to -8.1) percentage points. Once hospitalized, however, MA enrollment increased use of intensive care by 6.7 (95% CI: 0.3 to 13.1) percentage points and non-invasive mechanical ventilation by 9.2 (95% CI: 5.5 to 12.9) percentage points. MA enrollment increased hospice use by 6.2 (95% CI: 2.3 to 10.1) percentage points at time of death and 7.7 (95% CI: 3.8 to 11.6) percentage points in the last 30 days of life. Particularly, MA enrollment increased hospice admissions among those who were admitted to the hospital within 30 days prior to hospice admission by 18.8 (95% CI: 13.8 to 23.8) percentage points. However, MA enrollment decreased hospice admissions among those who were admitted to home health within 30 days prior to hospice admission by 18.6 (95% CI: -21.9 to -15.2) percentage points.
CONCLUSIONS: MA plans may improve end-of-life care by reducing hospital death while also improving access to hospice, especially among recently hospitalized persons.
© 2022 Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare advantage; end-of-life care; hospice; traditional Medicare

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35156205      PMCID: PMC9264456          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.734


  28 in total

1.  Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.

Authors:  David J Meyers; Emmanuelle Belanger; Nina Joyce; John McHugh; Momotazur Rahman; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Site of Death, Place of Care, and Health Care Transitions Among US Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000-2015.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro Gozalo; Amal N Trivedi; Jennifer Bunker; Julie Lima; Jessica Ogarek; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Association of Medicare Advantage Penetration With Per Capita Spending, Emergency Department Visits, and Readmission Rates Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries With High Comorbidity Burden.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Brent A Langellier; Robert E Burke; Jose F Figueroa; Norma B Coe
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Bereaved family member perceptions of quality of end-of-life care in U.S. regions with high and low usage of intensive care unit care.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Vincent Mor; Nicholas Ward; Jason Roy; Brian Clarridge; John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Patterns of Cost for Patients Dying in the Intensive Care Unit and Implications for Cost Savings of Palliative Care Interventions.

Authors:  Nita Khandelwal; David Benkeser; Norma B Coe; Ruth A Engelberg; Joan M Teno; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Effect of Medicare Advantage on health care use and care dissatisfaction in mental illness.

Authors:  Sungchul Park
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.734

7.  HOW MUCH FAVORABLE SELECTION IS LEFT IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2015

8.  Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Julie P W Bynum; Natalie E Leland; Susan C Miller; Nancy E Morden; Thomas Scupp; David C Goodman; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Service use at the end-of-life in Medicare advantage versus traditional Medicare.

Authors:  David G Stevenson; John Z Ayanian; Alan M Zaslavsky; Joseph P Newhouse; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Differences in Health Care Utilization, Process of Diabetes Care, Care Satisfaction, and Health Status in Patients With Diabetes in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Eric B Larson; Paul Fishman; Lindsay White; Norma B Coe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.178

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of Medicare advantage on patterns of end-of-life care among Medicare decedents.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Joan M Teno; Lindsay White; Norma B Coe
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.734

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.