| Literature DB >> 35155258 |
Gisela María Suárez1, Mauricio Catalá2, Yadira Peña2, Susana Portela2, Ana Laura Añé-Kourí1, Amnely González1, Patricia Lorenzo-Luaces1, Manuel Díaz3, María de Los A Molina2, Karla Pereira1, Jenysbel de la C Hernández1, Raúl Ramos4,5, Mary Carmen Reyes6, Nuris Ledón1, Zaima Mazorra1, Tania Crombet1, Agustin Lage1, Danay Saavedra1.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the second cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy represent the current standard of care for advanced NSCLC. Platinum-based chemotherapy expands late-differentiated T cell populations. Therefore, immune restoration after chemotherapy to adjuvate the immunotherapeutic potential could be crucial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Biomodulina T (BT), a thymic polypeptide fraction, on peripheral lymphocytes subpopulations in the context of cancer disease. Additionally, whether these effects might induce a better response to CIMAvax-EGF, an epidermal growth factor (EGF) depleting immunotherapy. Eighteen advanced NSCLC patients were evaluated after being treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. We found that the frequency of terminally differentiated effector T cells re-expressing CD45RA (EMRA) CD4+ (p=0.0031) and CD8+ (p=0.0372) T cells decreased with the administration of BT, whereas CD4+ naive T cells increase in more than 70% of the patients. Remarkably, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes expressing programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD1) significantly decreased after BT administration (p=0.0005 and p<0.0001, respectively). We also found an enhancement of the anti-EGF antibody response with a large percentage of patients treated with CIMAvax-EGF reaching the good antibody response condition after four vaccine doses. Moreover, the median overall survival of patients treated with CIMAvax-EGF was 16.09 months. In conclusion, our results suggest that the immunorestoration generated by the administration of BT after first-line chemotherapy may induce a better immune response to CIMAvax-EGF that could translate into the clinical benefit of patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC.Entities:
Keywords: CIMAvax-EGF; PD-1; biomodulina T; naive T cells; non-small-cell lung cancer; terminally differentiated T cells
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155258 PMCID: PMC8828575 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.823287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Sequential combination of BT and CIMAvax-EGF in patients diagnosed with advanced Non-small cell lung cancer.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients.
| No | % | |
|---|---|---|
| n | 18 | 100 |
| Male | 12 | 66.67 |
| Female | 6 | 33.33 |
| Age mean (range) | 62.64 (53-80) | – |
|
| ||
| ECOG status 0 | 5 | 27.8 |
| ECOG status 1 | 11 | 61.1 |
| ECOG status 2 | 2 | 11.1 |
|
| ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 11 | 61.1 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 4 | 22.2 |
| NSCLC | 3 | 16.7 |
|
| ||
| Complete response | 2 | 11.11 |
| Partial response | 4 | 22.2 |
| Stable disease | 11 | 61.1 |
| Progressive disease | 1 | 5.6 |
|
| ||
| After-chemotherapy | 18 | 100 |
| After Biomodulina T | 18 | 100 |
|
| ||
| CIMAvax-EGF month 3 | 18 | 100 |
Proportion of patients in each category indicated were calculated of the total absolute number of patients included. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; NSCLC, Non-small cell lung cancer.
Figure 2CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets before and after the treatment with BT. (A) Gating strategy for single CD3+ T cells, then gated on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and subsets: naive (Naive, CD45RA+CCR7+), central memory (CM, CD45RA−CCR7+), effector memory (EM, CD45RA−CCR7−) and terminally differentiated effector T cells re-expressing CD45RA (EMRA, CD45RA+CCR7−). (B) Stages of cell differentiation in CD4+ T lymphocytes after chemotherapy and at the end of BT treatment. (C) Stages of cell differentiation in CD8+ T lymphocytes after chemotherapy and at the end of BT treatment. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences among the groups (*p<0.05; **p<0.01); using Paired t test or Wilcoxon test.
Figure 3Percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing PD1 before and after the treatment with BT. (A) Percentage of PD1+ in CD4 and CD8+ T cells after chemotherapy and at the end of Biomodulina T treatment. (B) Relative percentages of CD8+CD28-PD1+ T lymphocytes after chemotherapy and at the end of BT treatment. (C) Relative percentages of CD8+CD45RA+CD28-PD1+ T cells after chemotherapy and at the end of BT administration. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences among the groups (*p<0.05; ***p<0.001) using Wilcoxon test. Before BT, Before treatment with BT; End BT, At the end of BT administration; NSCLC, Non-small cell lung cancer.
Figure 4Kinetics of the anti-EGF antibody titers and serum EGF concentration in vaccinated patients. D0, baseline CIMAvax-EGF evaluation; M3, month 3 of evaluation; M6, month 6 of evaluation; M9, month 9 of evaluation; M12, month 12 of evaluation; c, concentration.
Figure 5Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival analysis of patients diagnosed with NSCLC, treated with the sequential combination of BT and CIMAvax-EGF (used as switch-maintenance strategy), after platinum-based chemotherapy. (A) Overall Survival of patients diagnosed with NSCLC, treated with BT immediately after platinum-based chemotherapy and then CIMAvax-EGF as switch-maintenance strategy. (B) Progression-Free Survival of patients diagnosed with NSCLC, treated with BT immediately after platinum-based chemotherapy and then CIMAvax-EGF as switch-maintenance strategy. OS, Overall survival; PFS, Progression-Free Survival; CI, confident interval.
Figure 6Survival analysis of patients diagnosed with NSCLC stratified according to the difference of the percentage of CD4+PD1+ T cells before and after BT administration. (A) Overall survival curves. Median OS for patients with CD4+PD1+ difference >0.18% was 24 months (95% CI not estimated) versus 6 months (95% CI 0.0-12.36 months) for patients with CD4+PD1+ difference <0.18%, p<0.0001 (B) Progression-free survival curves. Median progression-free survival time for patients with CD4+PD1+ difference >0.18% was 12.88 months (95% CI 7.5-18.19 months) versus 6.05 months (95% CI 1.38-7.56 months) for patients with CD4+PD1+ difference <0.18%, p<0.0001.