Oscar Arrieta1, Feliciano Barrón1, Laura Alejandra Ramírez-Tirado1, Zyanya Lucia Zatarain-Barrón1, Andrés F Cardona2,3,4, Diego Díaz-García1, Masao Yamamoto Ramos1, Beatriz Mota-Vega1, Amir Carmona1, Marco Polo Peralta Álvarez1, Yolanda Bautista5, Fernando Aldaco6, Raquel Gerson7, Christian Rolfo8, Rafael Rosell9. 1. Thoracic Oncology Unit, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, National Cancer Institute (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico. 2. Clinical and Translational Oncology Group, Clínica del Country, Bogotá, Colombia. 3. Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia. 4. Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (G-FOX), Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia. 5. Hospital de Oncología, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico. 6. Servicio de Oncología Médica, Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, Mexico City, Mexico. 7. Departamento de Oncología, Centro Médico ABC, Mexico City, Mexico. 8. Thoracic Medical Oncology and Early Clinical Trials, Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. 9. Molecular and Cellular Oncology Laboratory, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute and Hospital (IGTP), Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
Importance: Because of socioeconomic factors, many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not receive immunotherapy in the first-line setting. It is unknown if the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy can provide clinical benefits in immunotherapy-naive patients with disease progression after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC following platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of EGFR variants or programmed cell death ligand 1 status. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (PROLUNG) trial randomized 78 patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive eitherpembrolizumab plus docetaxel or docetaxelalone from December 2016 through May 2019. Interventions: The experimental arm received docetaxel on day 1 (75 mg/m2) plus pembrolizumab on day 8 (200 mg) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles followed by pembrolizumab maintenance until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The control arm received docetaxel monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Results: Among 78 recruited patients, 32 (41%) were men, 34 (44%) were never smokers, and 25 (32%) had an EGFR/ALK alteration. Forty patients were allocated to receive pembrolizumab plus docetaxel, and 38 were allocated to receive docetaxel. A statistically significant difference in ORR, assessed by an independent reviewer, was found in patients receiving pembrolizumab plus docetaxel vs patients receiving docetaxel (42.5% vs 15.8%; odds ratio, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.34-11.54; P = .01). Patients without EGFR variations had a considerable difference in ORR of 35.7% vs 12.0% (P = .06), whereas patients with EGFR variations had an ORR of 58.3% vs 23.1% (P = .14). Overall, PFS was longer in patients who received pembrolizumab plus docetaxel (9.5 months; 95% CI, 4.2-not reached) than in patients who received docetaxel (3.9 months; 95% CI, 3.2-5.7) (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.46; P < .001). For patients without variations, PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-not reached) vs 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.3) (P < .001), whereas in patients with EGFR variations, PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-not reached) vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.2) (P = .04). In terms of safety, 23% (9 of 40) vs 5% (2 of 38) of patients experienced grade 1 to 2 pneumonitis in the pembrolizumab plus docetaxel and docetaxel arms, respectively (P = .03), while 28% (11 of 40) vs 3% (1 of 38) experienced any-grade hypothyroidism (P = .002). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 2 study, the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel was well tolerated and substantially improved ORR and PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC who had previous progression after platinum-based chemotherapy, including NSCLC with EGFR variations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02574598.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Because of socioeconomic factors, many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not receive immunotherapy in the first-line setting. It is unknown if the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy can provide clinical benefits in immunotherapy-naive patients with disease progression after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC following platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of EGFR variants or programmed cell death ligand 1 status. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (PROLUNG) trial randomized 78 patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either pembrolizumab plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone from December 2016 through May 2019. Interventions: The experimental arm received docetaxel on day 1 (75 mg/m2) plus pembrolizumab on day 8 (200 mg) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles followed by pembrolizumab maintenance until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The control arm received docetaxel monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Results: Among 78 recruited patients, 32 (41%) were men, 34 (44%) were never smokers, and 25 (32%) had an EGFR/ALK alteration. Forty patients were allocated to receive pembrolizumab plus docetaxel, and 38 were allocated to receive docetaxel. A statistically significant difference in ORR, assessed by an independent reviewer, was found in patients receiving pembrolizumab plus docetaxel vs patients receiving docetaxel (42.5% vs 15.8%; odds ratio, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.34-11.54; P = .01). Patients without EGFR variations had a considerable difference in ORR of 35.7% vs 12.0% (P = .06), whereas patients with EGFR variations had an ORR of 58.3% vs 23.1% (P = .14). Overall, PFS was longer in patients who received pembrolizumab plus docetaxel (9.5 months; 95% CI, 4.2-not reached) than in patients who received docetaxel (3.9 months; 95% CI, 3.2-5.7) (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.46; P < .001). For patients without variations, PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-not reached) vs 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.3) (P < .001), whereas in patients with EGFR variations, PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-not reached) vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.2) (P = .04). In terms of safety, 23% (9 of 40) vs 5% (2 of 38) of patients experienced grade 1 to 2 pneumonitis in the pembrolizumab plus docetaxel and docetaxel arms, respectively (P = .03), while 28% (11 of 40) vs 3% (1 of 38) experienced any-grade hypothyroidism (P = .002). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 2 study, the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel was well tolerated and substantially improved ORR and PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC who had previous progression after platinum-based chemotherapy, including NSCLC with EGFR variations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02574598.
Authors: Oscar Arrieta; Andrés F Cardona; Claudio Martín; Luis Más-López; Luis Corrales-Rodríguez; Guillermo Bramuglia; Omar Castillo-Fernandez; Matthew Meyerson; Eduardo Amieva-Rivera; Alma Delia Campos-Parra; Hernán Carranza; Juan Carlos Gómez de la Torre; Yanina Powazniak; Fernando Aldaco-Sarvide; Carlos Vargas; Mariana Trigo; Manuel Magallanes-Maciel; Jorge Otero; Roberto Sánchez-Reyes; Mauricio Cuello Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Achim Rittmeyer; Fabrice Barlesi; Daniel Waterkamp; Keunchil Park; Fortunato Ciardiello; Joachim von Pawel; Shirish M Gadgeel; Toyoaki Hida; Dariusz M Kowalski; Manuel Cobo Dols; Diego L Cortinovis; Joseph Leach; Jonathan Polikoff; Carlos Barrios; Fairooz Kabbinavar; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Filippo De Marinis; Hande Turna; Jong-Seok Lee; Marcus Ballinger; Marcin Kowanetz; Pei He; Daniel S Chen; Alan Sandler; David R Gandara Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kathryn C Arbour; Laura Mezquita; Niamh Long; Hira Rizvi; Edouard Auclin; Andy Ni; Gala Martínez-Bernal; Roberto Ferrara; W Victoria Lai; Lizza E L Hendriks; Joshua K Sabari; Caroline Caramella; Andrew J Plodkowski; Darragh Halpenny; Jamie E Chaft; David Planchard; Gregory J Riely; Benjamin Besse; Matthew D Hellmann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Massimo Di Maio; Francesco Perrone; Paolo Chiodini; Ciro Gallo; Carlos Camps; Wolfgang Schuette; Elisabeth Quoix; Chun-Ming Tsai; Cesare Gridelli Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martin Reck; Tony S K Mok; Makoto Nishio; Robert M Jotte; Federico Cappuzzo; Francisco Orlandi; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Naoyuki Nogami; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Christian A Thomas; Fabrice Barlesi; Gene Finley; Anthony Lee; Shelley Coleman; Yu Deng; Marcin Kowanetz; Geetha Shankar; Wei Lin; Mark A Socinski Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Diego de Miguel-Perez; Alessandro Russo; Oscar Arrieta; Murat Ak; Feliciano Barron; Muthukumar Gunasekaran; Priyadarshini Mamindla; Luis Lara-Mejia; Christine B Peterson; Mehmet E Er; Vishal Peddagangireddy; Francesco Buemi; Brandon Cooper; Paolo Manca; Rena G Lapidus; Ru-Ching Hsia; Andres F Cardona; Aung Naing; Sunjay Kaushal; Fred R Hirsch; Philip C Mack; Maria Jose Serrano; Vincenzo Adamo; Rivka R Colen; Christian Rolfo Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-06-02