Chaoxu Liu1, Jin Zhou1, Cai Chang1, Wenxiang Zhi1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters for assessing the biological behavior of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 224 breast cancer lesions in 216 female patients were examined by B-mode ultrasound and shear wave elastography in sequence. The maximum size (Smax) of the lesion was measured by B-mode ultrasound, and then shear wave elastography was performed on this section to obtain relevant parameters, including maximum elasticity (Emax), mean elasticity (Emean), standard deviation of elasticity (SD), and the area ratio of shear wave elastography to B-mode ultrasound (AR). The relationship between SWE parameters and pathological type, histopathological classification, histological grade, lymphovascular invasion status (LVI), axillary lymph node status (ALN), and immunohistochemistry of breast cancer lesions was performed according to postoperative pathology. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the pathological type and histopathological classification of breast cancer were not significantly associated with SWE parameters; with an increase in the histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), SD (p = 0.016) and Smax (p = 0.000) values increased. In the ALN-positive group, Smax (p = 0.004) was significantly greater than in the ALN-negative group; Smax (p = 0.003), Emax (p = 0.034), and SD (p = 0.045) were significantly higher in the LVI-positive group than in the LVI-negative group; SD (p = 0.043, p = 0.047) and Smax (p = 0.000, p = 0.000) were significantly lower in the ER+ and PR+ groups than in the ER- and PR- groups, respectively; AR (p = 0.032) was significantly higher in the ER+ groups than in the ER- groups, and Smax (p = 0.002) of the HER2+ group showed higher values than that of the HER2- group; Smax (p = 0.000), SD (p = 0.006), and Emax (p = 0.004) of the Ki-67 high-expression group showed significantly higher values than those of the Ki-67 low-expression group. In the multivariate analysis, Ki-67 was an independent factor of Smax (p = 0.005), Emax (p = 0.004), and SD (p = 0.006); ER was an independent influencing factor of Smax (p = 0.000) and AR (p = 0.032). LVI independently influences Smax (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The SWE parameters Emax, SD, and AR can be used to evaluate the biological behavior of breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters for assessing the biological behavior of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 224 breast cancer lesions in 216 female patients were examined by B-mode ultrasound and shear wave elastography in sequence. The maximum size (Smax) of the lesion was measured by B-mode ultrasound, and then shear wave elastography was performed on this section to obtain relevant parameters, including maximum elasticity (Emax), mean elasticity (Emean), standard deviation of elasticity (SD), and the area ratio of shear wave elastography to B-mode ultrasound (AR). The relationship between SWE parameters and pathological type, histopathological classification, histological grade, lymphovascular invasion status (LVI), axillary lymph node status (ALN), and immunohistochemistry of breast cancer lesions was performed according to postoperative pathology. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the pathological type and histopathological classification of breast cancer were not significantly associated with SWE parameters; with an increase in the histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), SD (p = 0.016) and Smax (p = 0.000) values increased. In the ALN-positive group, Smax (p = 0.004) was significantly greater than in the ALN-negative group; Smax (p = 0.003), Emax (p = 0.034), and SD (p = 0.045) were significantly higher in the LVI-positive group than in the LVI-negative group; SD (p = 0.043, p = 0.047) and Smax (p = 0.000, p = 0.000) were significantly lower in the ER+ and PR+ groups than in the ER- and PR- groups, respectively; AR (p = 0.032) was significantly higher in the ER+ groups than in the ER- groups, and Smax (p = 0.002) of the HER2+ group showed higher values than that of the HER2- group; Smax (p = 0.000), SD (p = 0.006), and Emax (p = 0.004) of the Ki-67 high-expression group showed significantly higher values than those of the Ki-67 low-expression group. In the multivariate analysis, Ki-67 was an independent factor of Smax (p = 0.005), Emax (p = 0.004), and SD (p = 0.006); ER was an independent influencing factor of Smax (p = 0.000) and AR (p = 0.032). LVI independently influences Smax (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The SWE parameters Emax, SD, and AR can be used to evaluate the biological behavior of breast cancer.
Authors: Andrew Evans; Patsy Whelehan; Kim Thomson; Denis McLean; Katrin Brauer; Colin Purdie; Lee Jordan; Lee Baker; Alastair Thompson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Lillian M Smyth; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Helen H Won; Alison M Schram; Cristina Saura; Sherene Loi; Janice Lu; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Dejan Juric; Ingrid A Mayer; Carlos L Arteaga; Macarena I de la Fuente; Adam M Brufksy; Iben Spanggaard; Morten Mau-Sørensen; Monica Arnedos; Victor Moreno; Valentina Boni; Joohyuk Sohn; Lee S Schwartzberg; Xavier Gonzàlez-Farré; Andrés Cervantes; François-Clement Bidard; Alexander N Gorelick; Richard B Lanman; Rebecca J Nagy; Gary A Ulaner; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Komal Jhaveri; Elena I Gavrila; Catherine Zimel; S Duygu Selcuklu; Myra Melcer; Aliaksandra Samoila; Yanyan Cai; Maurizio Scaltriti; Grace Mann; Feng Xu; Lisa D Eli; Melanie Dujka; Alshad S Lalani; Richard Bryce; José Baselga; Barry S Taylor; David B Solit; Funda Meric-Bernstam; David M Hyman Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 38.272