| Literature DB >> 35154678 |
Zhihua Tao1, Weiqi Liu1, Qinxia Hu1, Xue Wu1, Shuying Xie1, Hongmei Zhang1, Minghui Fu1, Jing Yang1, Yan Jiang1.
Abstract
The bacterial diversity of salted mackerel "one-night courtyard" at soft frozen area (-7℃-0℃) storage was studied. The fish samples at 0, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days were analysis for bacterial structure using high-throughput sequencing technologies (HTS) and biogenic amines using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The analysis results of HTS showed that the dominant bacteria species was varied gradually following with storage time. On the 0th, 21st, and 28th days of storage, dominant Vibrionaceae was accounting for 71.70%, 59.16%, and 70.68% of the total sequences analyzed, respectively. On the 14th and 35th days, Shewanellaceae was the dominant bacterial, accounting for 87.53% and 70.95% of the total sequences analyzed, respectively. In addition, 21st and 28th days, an abundance of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) was top. The dominant bacterial of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, was producer of biogenic amines. Furthermore, the analysis results of HPLC shown the total biogenic amines of maximum amount 363.01 mg/kg in the sample of HY.14 lower than 1000 mg/kg of the FDA regulation. The range ability of cadaverine was obvious following with the storage time. Cadaverine was 87.36 mg/kg on the 0th day, and it was maximum amount of 276.89 mg/kg on the 14th days. Putrescine was 20 mg/kg on the 0th day and maximum amount of 55.04 mg/kg on the 28thdays of storage. The tyramine was smallest amount of production, and the largest amount was 38.99 mg/kg on 28th, and the smallest amount was 11.97 mg/kg on 35th. Nevertheless, the maximum amount of histamine was 55.04 mg/kg on the 0th day and about 23.14 mg/kg of histamine was little change from 14th to 35th days of storage. Dominant bacteria affect the change of biogenic amines. The study can help understand the interaction between microbial flora and biogenic amines in the salted mackerel of one-night courtyard.Entities:
Keywords: biogenic amines; high‐throughput sequencing technologies (HTS); microorganisms diversity; salted mackerel; structure analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 35154678 PMCID: PMC8825740 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1The number of total bacteria, staphylococci, lactic acid bacteria, Escherichia coli following with storage time
OUTs and estimation of species richness
| Sample | Observed species | Sequence( | Reads OTU( | ACE | Chao estimator | Shannon index | Simpson index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HY.00 | 112 | 46,359 | 136 | 145.73 | 132.67 | 2.12 | 0.58 |
| HY.14 | 53 | 47,621 | 55 | 56.17 | 54.11 | 1.57 | 0.39 |
| HY.21 | 377 | 42,229 | 398 | 402.83 | 396.8 | 4.31 | 0.8 |
| HY.28 | 276 | 53,221 | 306 | 333.91 | 328.98 | 3.57 | 0.77 |
| HY.35 | 182 | 33,332 | 200 | 209.12 | 202.32 | 2.59 | 0.59 |
FIGURE 2Rarefaction curves analysis of bacteria of the salted fish sample
FIGURE 3Venn analysis of microbial community of the salted fish samples following with storage time
FIGURE 4Relative abundance of bacteria of salted fish samples (a) phylum level (b) genus level
FIGURE 5Tree species classification of the salted fish samples. Different colors of circles indicated different levels of classification, the size of the circle represented the relative abundance of the classification, two digital classification below were indicated relative abundance percentage, the percentage of all the former said the classification and classification of the species in the sample, while the latter represented the percentage of the species classification accounted for the selected samples
FIGURE 6Heatmap of bacterial genera based on relative abundance of salted fish samples following with storage time
Content of biogenic amines in the samples
| Sample | Biogenic amines | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putrescine (mg/kg) | Cadaverine (mg/kg) | Histamine (mg/kg) | Tyramine (mg/kg) | |
| HY.00 | 20.00 ± 0.02 | 87.36 ± 0.17 | 55.04 ± 0.21 | ‐ |
| HY.14 | 40.05 ± 0.11 | 276.89 ± 0.23 | 25.33 ± 0.14 | 20.74 ± 0.12 |
| HY.21 | 36.44 ± 0.13 | 224.76 ± 0.19 | 23.15 ± 0.16 | 12.17 ± 0.05 |
| HY.28 | 55.04 ± 0.03 | 25.33 ± 0.18 | 23.14 ± 0.24 | 38.99 ± 0.20 |
| HY.35 | 20.74 ± 0.09 | 12.17 ± 0.07 | 23.54 ± 0.08 | 11.97 ± 0.08 |
“‐”: Not detected.
Each result was measured three times to calculate the average value.
The values are expressed as averages of the average value ± SD (p < .05).
FIGURE 7Variation trend of biogenic amines following with storage time